Steve, Little Walden asked:
How much radiation are you exposed to during a medical x-ray? How does that compare to the dosage levels radiation workers are allowed to receive?
We put this to Phil Clarke and Stuart Yates:
Phil - Hi, I’m Phil Clark from the Particle Physics group in Edinburgh University. And first of all, when you’re discussing radiation dosage, it often gets quite complex due to the different ways to measure radiation and there’s often an abundance of different units like, rems, grays, sieverts, Röntgens, Becquerels, Curies and so on so that can confuse things so much. But the important unit of measurement is what known as the Gray (Gy) and that’s the unit of absorbed dose.
It corresponds to one joule of energy absorbed by a kilogram of material. Now the different types of radiation like alpha, beta and gamma decays, result in different biological effects. So what you do is you have to take the grey number and multiply it by what’s often called the Q factor and an example would be for x-rays and electrons, the Q value would be one. So, if you multiply those two together, you get what’s known as the dose equivalent and the scientific measurement for that is a sievert.
And one sievert is actually quite a large value so you typically measure in millisieverts, so thousands of sieverts. Now a typical standard chest x-ray produces about 0.1 millisievert and the dosage that are recommended for people working at CERN or the maximum dose is about 6 millisieverts. And if you’re a radiation worker it goes up to about 20, or if you’re an airline staff member, the usual measurement is 5 millisieverts. So the amount of radiation you get from an x-ray is actually quite small.
Diana - That’s the physics of x-ray doses but what about the different types of x-ray scans?
Stuart - My name’s Stuart Yates and I’m a radiation protection advisor working at Addenbrookes Hospital. Well, you get a very wide range of different x-rays giving different amounts of radiation dose, but taking a typical example chest x-ray, its’ very common lots of people might be referred to by the GP or hospital doctor.
And a typical x-ray gives you about the same amount of radiation dosage you’d get in three or four days from natural sources of radiation in the environment and also natural radioactivity in food that we eat, for example, Brazil nuts contain radium and so they’re slightly radioactive. And so typically, a chest x-ray is about the same as eating three or four bags of Brazil nuts in terms of radiation dose.
The CT scans I think can give you more radiation dose or your equivalent perhaps to a few years of natural radiation but then the benefit is also that much greater because the doctors will get that much more information and so one of the key things in all x-rays is that, you will only get that x-ray if the benefit outweighs the risk.
Because radiation comes naturally from cosmic rays from outer space we’re actually quite well-protected at ground level from that radiation because of absorption in the atmosphere. But when we fly, we’re less protected because we’re higher up in the atmosphere and so typically you’d get the same amount of radiation dose from a chest x-ray as you would from say, a return flight to Southern Europe.
Diana - So, a simple chest x-ray will give you 0.1 millisieverts. That’s the 60th of the dose limit for someone at CERN. However, a CT scan can give you up to 20 millisieverts of radiation which is four years worth of background radiation and that’s unless you live in some parts of Cornwall where it’s only two years worth because the rocks there emit lots of lovely radioactive radon.
I think a chest x ray (CXR) is the equivalent radiation dose to 4.5 days of environmental solar exposure...an abdominal CT, on the other hand, is the equivalent of about 4.5 years, so a significant exposure.
I guess you also need to take into account the reason why the person is having the X-ray - if life is that dangerous to you then the risk from an x-ray is probably minor in comparison!
Every doctor,chemist and biologist and all owe Physics a lot.
I'm sure the dosage-level and risks for a medical X-ray varies considerably depending on the type of X-ray, and in general a CT-scan (computed tomography) scan will be much higher than for a conventional 'shadow' X-ray.
X-ray usage has not always been so tightly controlled ...
This is a relevant news story to your thread I feel
Quote from the reference provided by Shibs above:
Ok, so your vote was for penicillum, hum? Fine, when you get abdominal pain and think you have appendicitis, I think you should skip the cat scan and ask for penicillen and go home. See what happens. When you need a CT, it is the BEST inventin of the world, we do not miss appendicitis anymore and the lawyers are mad. They are hoping to scare the docs with radiation worries, WHO CARES about radiaition if yo need to know about appendicitis? Just skip your flight to hawaii for the next three years and turn off your TV for 500 hours. Yes, so remember, you get penicillin, and no cat scan. Fine. Put that in your last will and testament. Real guy, Thu, 7th Jan 2010
I have always wondered why the radiation goes up as you fly. Could it be that there is an accumulation of radiation in the atmosphere because of atomic testing in Nevada , Muroara , and all those other places ? Also I always wondered why there is a slightly higher radiation count in the Rockies ? Could it be that there was open air boxcars with yellow cake going to a nuclear processing plant ? lumos, Thu, 18th Nov 2010
i had a panoramic xray of teeth in march 2015, a lung at dec and two of my back after falling on glass. again teeth problem! and two other small photo on april 2016. im worried that i have absorbed too much! i am now heading to a dr for extreme pain in my breast. im like scared to death if ive got cancer :( i know that the rate is low though guest, Sat, 19th Nov 2016