Post by: guest39538 on 24/08/2018 13:52:46
Author : TheBox
Credentials: Genius
Abstract : This paper proposes the possibility of an electrical universe that may consist of convergence fields that may countermand each other to measure null results in regards to electrical charge. Additionally this paper strongly suggests the possibility of an underlying negative energy field for which the abstracted math is in agreement with , providing us with demonstrated premise for argument.
Math
-0.5q + 0.5q = 0q where q = charge
This simple arbitrary abstract equation explains that a proportional amount of negative energy and positive energy will measure a neutral result. A perfect equilibrium of fine tuning , a critical balance of electrodynamics that neutralizes the measurement defining a constant , which for the purpose of discussion we will name this constant K0 where K is a yet undefined volume of constant space and 0 is the charge constant occupying that space.
Constant space K
The NFEU model suggests that constant space K has always existed and will always exist, a pre-big bang space that is the infinite parent space that allows all things to happen 'within', although within can be considered within an imaginary boundary partition space, such as XYZ.
The proposition of constant space K always existing is based on logical thought and conclusion that may be of axiom value.
1) Space cannot be created or destroyed
2) Space is timeless and does not age
3) Space is no thing but nothingness
4) Space is the stationary reference frame
The above four propositions, seemingly self evident and consistent with observation of space and the physical properties of space . There is no evidence to suggest space is anything other than the proposed four observations and I gladly ''challenge'' anybody to produce and bring forthwith objective argument against these propositions .
To describe K space in relativistic terms, we can describe K space in being an unknown or n-dimensional volume of geometrical points, where no thing exists in the volume of nothingness.
Diagram 1: An artistic impression of K space.
k space.jpg (72.82 kB . 3788x1248 - viewed 4946 times)The NFEU model suggests that constant K space has no mechanism to be visibly light or dark, the artistic impression Diagram 1, the imagined/observed darkness, being an optical illusion of perception. In response the NFEU model presents the proposition of K space being an entirety of transparent. In simple terms , it is not visibly dark or visibly light in the artistic impression representation of K space, there is simply no thing reflecting visible light or emitting visible light , additionally there is no invisible , detectable light, such as the CBMR. Now we should be aware that this proposition will be imperceivable to some people , as it is difficult to visualize nothingness being other than 0 dimensions.
The NFEU model proposes that a pre-big bang existing space had to exist for the rational reasoning of:
1) All things need a space to exist in
2) All events need a space to happen in
3) Expansion needs space to expand into
Post by: guest39538 on 25/08/2018 14:27:25
K0
The NFEU model considers the intricate details of how it maybe possible for some thing, to manifest from nothingness but considering nothingness as mentioned earlier in the NFUE model, a n-dimensional volume of geometrical points that contains no things of physicality.
One would assume we should start by considering any given point of space and considering the properties/ possible properties of this given point. Knowing that a point has 0 dimensions and is already stated in the NFUE model is made of no thing, giving the point an opening value of 0 to work with. For the purpose of discussion we will specify this point in being point 0 or the starting point of a singularity/big bang.
The NFUE model considers point 0 is surrounded by other points of space and considers firstly any force(s) involved , investigating the first possible causality of the manifestation of energy.
We can consider that the centripetal isotropic force acting on our point 0 :
F=0N where F is force and N is newtons.
Diagram 2 - point force/pressure
diagram 2 - point pressure.jpg (108.5 kB . 2372x1552 - viewed 4722 times)To be continued...
Post by: alancalverd on 25/08/2018 14:57:53
This kind of meaningless drivel belongs in the catalog of an art gallery, the program notes of some egregious modern composer, or a postgraduate seminar in quantum philosophy. Don't waste it on mere seekers of wisdom.
Post by: Bored chemist on 25/08/2018 16:03:29
Post by: guest39538 on 25/08/2018 16:28:06
K0
In continuing the discussion of diagram 2, point force/pressure , the NFEU model proposes that all geometrical points of the n-dimensional K space, ''experience'' an equal and isotropic proportional force(s) ; F= 0N, acting upon any given point.
It is quite apparent at this stage of the NFEU model, that our investigations and explanation of K space have produced in findings no mechanisms for :
1) Time
2) Energy
3) Motion
Lets us take a step back in the NFUE model and reconsider K spaces nothingness and no thing exists. At this point the NFUE model considers philosophy and direction. The NFUE model proposes from a philosophical view point, that we could not get less than nothingness, nothingness being the absolute least, from this the NFUE model proposes that the only direction nothingness and no thing ''can go'' , is becoming some thing of physical presence. The NFUE model concludes from this philosophical view, that a direction established defines that it is some how , in some way possible , nothingness can change into some thing.
Which can be expressed (delta) Δ0 = ? where delta (Δ) is change.
The NFUE model also defines for the purpose of understanding, that K space is not a vacuum, K space having no boundary or ''edge''.
A thought provoking mystery that is well worth ones time in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of the Universe. One must contrive to put all their efforts into thinking if one wishes to recreate the creation of some thing from nothingness. A worthy task for anybodies mind indeed, the rewards of finding the answer, worth more than gold, a challenge of the highest form and not for mediocre minds .
Moving on, the NFUE model considers all aspects of each specific case being investigated, trying not to leave out any details that may become important later on in the NFUE model. The next question the NFUE model asks:
What opposing force or permeability could K space possibly have ?
In consideration of this the NFUE model considers conceptually a deflated balloon being inflated in K space.
1) The K space does not apply any opposing force or opposing permeability on the balloons expanding surface.
2) K space that is exterior to the interior K space of the balloon ''enters'' the balloon on expansion.
Diagram 3 - Inflation
diagram 3 inflation.jpg (184.67 kB . 2372x1552 - viewed 4653 times)What does this show us in relation to K space? The NFUE model deducts and proposes from this conceptual experiment, that K space cannot be displaced by any thing, but rather instead, K space can pass through any thing , but not in the sense of that K space has motion, in a sense that things can have motion and when moving do not displace any geometrical points of K space.
In the wake of this deduction, the NFUE model proposes with a greater certainty:
K space is the stationary ''background'' reference frame , that any thing moves relative too.
At this stage of the NFUE model we have now reached a point where we shall investigate things further , looking to establish a rudiment mechanism for manifesting energy . In reflection of this, the NFUE model is going to draw our attention towards F=0N and pressure P = 0 that is being ''applied'' on any given geometrical point of K space (reference diagram 2).
Newtons third law of motion states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, again considering a philosophical view, could this statement be applied to point 0 ? The action of no force and no pressure and no thing, having the opposite reaction of becoming a thing ! Also remembering the earlier philosophical view of the NFUE model , nothingness only has one direction it can change.
Now I am sure this sounds a bit magical and far fetched, however, the NFUE model proposes that the first manifested energy was a point 0 ,static charge, of either signed charge polarities, bringing the ''magic'' to physical life. A static charge of zero point energy (ZPE) manifested by ZPP (zero point pressure) .
To be continued....
To be continued......
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 14:25:42
K0
As mentioned in the previous , the NFUE model proposes a static point charge of either signed charge polarities is the first manifested energy in the Universe, by the process of ZPP. The NFUE model considers that this rudiment static point charge . to be of either a negative or positive polarity .
At this point of the NFUE model, we shall now investigate in some detail, negative and positive polarity charge dynamics, in which we will establish point charge dissipation and the fundamental power source of the Universe.
For the purpose of discussion , the NFUE model introduces two new concepts
1) Alpha waves ( Electron static charge self annihilation and dissipation)
2) Beta waves ( Proton static charge self annihilation and dissipation).
Both Alpha and Beta waves being the consequent result of the identical static charge self annihilation and dissipation process. The static charge self annihilation and dissipation process is based on some basic scientific physical facts, likewise assigned charges repulse each other , i.e electrons repulse electrons.
The NFUE model deducts from this physical information that it would be impossible to have a volume of geometrical points that the volume was solely electrons, concluding a volume of such would be in an automatic state of expansion . Likewise the same deduction could be applied to a volume of geometrical points that solely contained protons. Additionally in the NFUE model deduction phase, the model concludes and proposes that in such a volume of geometrical points where only one of the two assigned charges occupied, there would be no gravity. Electrons have no gravitational affect on other electrons , demonstrated by their repulsive property. Likewise Protons have no gravitational affect on other Protons. Gravitational affect being a consequent of the binary pair of electrons and protons , opposite assigned charges attract each other as we know.
Diagram 4. Static charge self annihilation and dissipation
diagram 4.jpg (136.48 kB . 2372x1552 - viewed 4516 times)The NFUE model proposes that at the instant of manifestation of either assigned charge, the charge self annihilates and under goes the dissipation process in accordance with the inverse square law. The NFUE model explains this in arbitrary abstract math :
E1=
and E2=
Where (A) is alpha waves and (B) is beta waves and (K) is K space. E1 and E2 respectively being opposite polarities.
Continuing the NFUE model, the model considers and proposes that the static charge self annihilation and dissipation process are micro bangs that disperse the point energy manifestations out of meaningful existence . In reference the NFUE model directs us to Dirac and notes, particles popping into and out of existence, except the NFUE model does not consider the first manifested energy in being a particle, but rather a temporal transition phase shift of energy instead. What this means is relating to time and the manifested energy has a discrete period of changing from one condition to another forming part of the Universes initial development. To simplify the NFUE model explains time beginning then time ending again as multiple micro bangs, emanating from any random geometrical point of the K space n-dimensional volume.
To be continued......
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/08/2018 17:59:50
To be continued......Why bother?
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 18:24:21
Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?To be continued......Why bother?
Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.
Post by: The Spoon on 26/08/2018 19:15:22
It's not science though is it? Just a troll pratting around and posting drivel.Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?To be continued......Why bother?
Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 19:27:58
It's not science though is it?Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?To be continued......Why bother?
Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.
You don't sound too sure if you are asking a question. Can you also please stay out of the thread with your negativity , I intend on completing the thread.
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/08/2018 20:07:04
Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?You show no evidence of even knowing what science is.
Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.That would be OK if this was a blog site, but it isn't.
Please stop cluttering the place up with trash.
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 20:11:37
Quote
Continuing the NFUE model, the model considers and proposes that the static charge self annihilation and dissipation process are micro bangs that disperse the point energy manifestations out of meaningful existence . In reference the NFUE model directs us to Dirac and notes, particles popping into and out of existence, except the NFUE model does not consider the first manifested energy in being a particle, but rather a temporal transition phase shift of energy instead. What this means is relating to time and the manifested energy has a discrete period of changing from one condition to another forming part of the Universes initial development. To simplify the NFUE model explains time beginning then time ending again as multiple micro bangs, emanating from any random geometrical point of the K space n-dimensional volume.
NFEU MODEL ( Neutral Field Electrical Universe) continued....
K0
Continuing the NFUE model , we can consider that the multiple micro bangs static charge self annihilation and dissipation process, that opposite assigned polarities have weak interactions with each other, what this means in more specific detail is that an Alpha waves dissipate magnitude is not ample enough to retain a Beta wave to form a binary construct of mass. Likewise Beta waves do not have enough magnitude to retain an Alpha wave.
However , the NFUE model compares the weak energy in accumulation to be comparative to the cosmic background microwave radiation, proposing pre-big bang spatial ''pockets'' of Alpha and/or Beta waves.
What this means in simple terms, is the initial Universe was not in a hot gaseous state , but rather in a state of dissipated mono-pole charge chaos, gas being made of atoms which at this pre-big bang stage , did not exist .
Diagram 5 - Multiple micro bangs, Alpha and Beta waves dissipate
diagram 5.jpg (162.58 kB . 2372x1552 - viewed 4513 times)Before we move on in the NFUE model and explain Alpha and Beta wave convergence theory, let us first recap on a few points of the NFUE model.
1) Nothingness is not the same as no thing
2) A point is 0 dimensions and can be any given point of a volume
3) No thing exists in K space
4) K space is a n-dimensional volume of nothingness
5) Relatively XYZ is a finite partition within K space
6) Alpha and Beta waves are the consequent results of self annihilating static point charge.
7) K space is the relative stationary reference frame
To be continued...
Post by: The Spoon on 26/08/2018 20:13:19
This is a public forum. I will post on this thread if I wish to, as will others who have pointed out this is a stream of garbage.It's not science though is it?Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?To be continued......Why bother?
Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.
You don't sound too sure if you are asking a question. Can you also please stay out of the thread with your negativity , I intend on completing the thread.
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 20:15:07
I have reported you for trolling me.Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?You show no evidence of even knowing what science is.Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.That would be OK if this was a blog site, but it isn't.
Please stop cluttering the place up with trash.
Post by: The Spoon on 26/08/2018 20:15:51
I am managing to forget all the fake science I made up in my mind , also my compulsion to post nonsense is fading and I am slowly stopping the want/feel for the need to do science.You posted this a week ago. Just another ploy to get attention and sympathy wasn't it?
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 20:18:15
This is a public forum. I will post on this thread if I wish to, as will others who have pointed out this is a stream of garbage.
Your posts are unrelated nonsense, I set a challenge earlier on in the thread, nobody as attempted to disprove me .
Either discuss my work or do one ! PERIOD
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 20:20:50
You posted this a week ago. Just another ploy to get attention and sympathy wasn't it?
I am a scientist , end of argument. Mediocre minds do not belong in this thread, take a hint.
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/08/2018 21:06:10
nobody as attempted to disprove me .In order to be disproven, it would first need to make sense.
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/08/2018 21:06:48
Mediocre minds do not belong in this thread,So, you are blocking yourself from your own thread.
That's rather odd.
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 21:41:19
All you ever say is nonsense, it makes sense , you don't make sense.Mediocre minds do not belong in this thread,So, you are blocking yourself from your own thread.
That's rather odd.
Post by: The Spoon on 26/08/2018 23:44:37
A bit rich coming from a self confessed troll who by their own admission lacks self control.I have reported you for trolling me.Because I like science and writing makes me happy, is that a good enough reason ?You show no evidence of even knowing what science is.Who cares if I am talking to myself, I am good company to myself.That would be OK if this was a blog site, but it isn't.
Please stop cluttering the place up with trash.
Post by: guest39538 on 26/08/2018 23:58:15
A bit rich coming from a self confessed troll who by their own admission lacks self control.
Time is a healer , depression just is, desperation is manic.
Post by: Bored chemist on 27/08/2018 08:53:20
Would you like to set up a poll to see which of us talks more sense?All you ever say is nonsense, it makes sense , you don't make sense.Mediocre minds do not belong in this thread,So, you are blocking yourself from your own thread.
That's rather odd.
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 12:56:39
Let me set you straight , I am not bothered about getting into a pissing competition with you. You do not concern me, you only disrupt my threads intentionally and are a proper troll who has no real interest in science whatsoever, I would ban you if I was a moderator here because your posts are useless, unrelated to science . You have no sense and again have ruined my thread intentionally. Tell you what MR C, have this forum , it is yours , I am going to go find a religious forum instead or a political forum to chill out on. Enjoy your time here alone MR C with nobody to troll.....Would you like to set up a poll to see which of us talks more sense?All you ever say is nonsense, it makes sense , you don't make sense.Mediocre minds do not belong in this thread,So, you are blocking yourself from your own thread.
That's rather odd.
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 13:54:13
Saying nonsense, is a lame challenge of mediocre minds. I have broke most of science but seemingly nobody as broke my notions....
Grrrrrrrrr, MR C knows how to wind me up with his ignorance to science!
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 14:40:50
K0
In continuance of the NFUE model, the NFUE model now considers the consequent of action if an Alpha wave point and a Beta wave point manifested simultaneously, precisely positioned at the same geometrical point of K space .
Diagram 6: Binary singularity
Diagram 6 - Binary singularity.jpg (117.44 kB . 2952x1364 - viewed 4166 times)The NFUE model now makes reference to Coulombs laws :
''A law stating that like charges repel and opposite charges attract, with a force proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.''
In deduction the NFUE model now considers and proposes that an Alpha wave manifestation point and a Beta wave manifestation point, manifesting simultaneously , positioned at the same geometrical point , will result in the two opposite assigned polarities forming a binary bond. This is concluded by , that at the manifestation origin point, the Alpha waves and Beta waves having greater magnitude to retain the opposite assigned polarity point charge .
In arbitrary abstract maths the NFUE model demonstrates:
= 1/t The value of (A) and (B) both being 0.5 , where A=Alpha wave , B = Beta wave , K = K space and t = absolute time. (note: relative time does not begin until the first binary C particle manifests).
The NFUE model assigns the letter C to the manifested binary energy particle singularity. Additionally the NFUE considers this binary energy particle , in being a photon.
At this stage of the NFUE model, we can consider the manifested binary C particle:
1) The start of space-time
2) The first mass
3) The first physical thing of existence
The NFUE model does recognize that the notions proposed thus far, some readers may not be able to comprehend the physics involved, as the NFUE models approach to physics requires deep understanding that is beyond comfort zones and conventional thought. In saying that , the NFUE model explains that the notion relates to mass /energy equivalent, focusing on energy rather than particles like grains of rice.
The NFUE model now moves on to propose Alpha waves and Beta wave , binary C particle convergence theory , an event that the NFUE model proposes is the causality , resulting in the big bang.
To be continued......
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 17:00:34
K0
Diagram 7 - Alpha wave/Beta wave , energy particle C convergence.
diagram 7.jpg (135.11 kB . 2952x1364 - viewed 7467 times)The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract math demonstrates:
+ + = 2/tThis math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
To be continued....
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 20:49:33
If my notion is so wrong, then why isn't there a single attempt to falsify my notions?Because people have learned by past experience it is just pigeon chess.
Post by: Bored chemist on 27/08/2018 21:05:13
Let me set you straight , I am not bothered about getting into a pissing competition with you.Posting nonsense on a science web site is starting a pissing contest.
You started it; you lost.
Not against me, but against science.
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 21:43:08
NFEU MODEL ( Neutral Field Electrical Universe) continued....
K0
Diagram 7 - Alpha wave/Beta wave , energy particle C convergence.
The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract math demonstrates:
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
To be continued....
Ignoring the background white noise of the forum....
The NFUE model continues and describes that the epicenter of the proposed electrical neutral generated black hole field, undergoes point density where the epicenter point singularity has a steady state inflow of Alpha and /or Beta waves.
Diagram 8 - Inflow/expansion Causality
Diagram 8.jpg (142.74 kB . 2952x1364 - viewed 7404 times)Post by: Bored chemist on 27/08/2018 21:46:54
Ignoring the background white noise of the forum....I think you mean "adding to the noise on the forum".
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 21:51:30
The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract mathCertainly is arbitary as usual..
Interesting you refer to 'math' which is the American term as opposed to 'maths' which is used in the UK. Do you think it makes you sound more sciencey?
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 21:54:02
Do you have any objective criticism about the NFUE model MR C? or are going to continue to waste your own time by posting none related content.Ignoring the background white noise of the forum....I think you mean "adding to the noise on the forum".
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 21:55:43
You understood it meant math or maths, so do you really feel there is a need for a correction when we know what is meant ?The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract mathCertainly is arbitary as usual..
Interesting you refer to 'math' which is the American term as opposed to 'maths' which is used in the UK. Do you think it makes you sound more sciencey?
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 21:59:12
Oh, I was just curious about your pretensions.You understood it meant math or maths, so do you really feel there is a need for a correction when we know what is meant ?The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract mathCertainly is arbitary as usual..
Interesting you refer to 'math' which is the American term as opposed to 'maths' which is used in the UK. Do you think it makes you sound more sciencey?
Post by: Bored chemist on 27/08/2018 22:00:10
Do you have any objective criticism about the NFUE model MR C?Yes.
None of it means anything.
It's word salad- "noise" if you like the word.
Post by: Bored chemist on 27/08/2018 22:01:13
It's a valid question; why use the wrong word?You understood it meant math or maths, so do you really feel there is a need for a correction when we know what is meant ?The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract mathCertainly is arbitary as usual..
Interesting you refer to 'math' which is the American term as opposed to 'maths' which is used in the UK. Do you think it makes you sound more sciencey?
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 22:05:21
Do you have any objective criticism about the NFUE model MR C?Yes.
None of it means anything.
It's word salad- "noise" if you like the word.
That suppose to be an objective argument ? Its sounds more like a because I said so routine. You have no argument because I have presented an objective workable theory . I don't think you like this fact.
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:09:45
So explain the equation you posted above.Do you have any objective criticism about the NFUE model MR C?Yes.
None of it means anything.
It's word salad- "noise" if you like the word.
That suppose to be an objective argument ? Its sounds more like a because I said so routine. You have no argument because I have presented an objective workable theory . I don't think you like this fact.
Who said the theory was workable?
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 22:14:33
So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?
The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.
Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model
b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
What do you not understand ?
P.s I understand your confusion I think, we cant do A+B/t because at that point time did not exist, so we have to use K space .
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:18:43
And how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?
The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.
Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model
b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
What do you not understand ?
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 22:21:01
A...........K..................B A+B/KAnd how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?
The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.
Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model
b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
What do you not understand ?
Ok so far? You can consider K is infinite if you like.
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:24:55
No. Explain what that actually means instead of throwing together letters and claiming it is meaningful. An 'arbitary abstract equation' just means something you have made up. You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.A...........K..................B A+B/KAnd how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?
The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.
Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model
b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
What do you not understand ?
Ok so far? You can consider K is infinite if you like.
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 22:36:24
You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.
I am not quite sure what you mean , so let me try again and start with Alpha waves
This represents the dissipate into a n -dimensional K space. Can you understand that part?
We could also say divided by force 1, but I prefer space.
added- imagine me and you are A and we split up , we are divided by space yes?
Post by: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:49:59
That is not how division works as a mathematical operation....You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.
I am not quite sure what you mean , so let me try again and start with Alpha waves
This represents the dissipate into a n -dimensional K space. Can you understand that part?
We could also say divided by force 1, but I prefer space.
added- imagine me and you are A and we split up , we are divided by space yes?
Post by: guest39538 on 27/08/2018 23:00:55
That is not how division works as a mathematical operation....
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process. Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process. I got 0.5 + 0.5 = 1 and I have got 1+0.5+0.5 = 2 , I see that is correct...also I have -0.5q + 0.5q = N q which is correct
We could say
but remembering this is a single micro bang value. represents multiple micro bangs and the accumulative of alpha waves in general. Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 09:02:11
I have presented an objective workable theoryYou have not presented a theory.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 09:10:56
Correct MR C, I have presented a new theory , which it is quite apparent, nobody has objected to in the ways of trying to falsify it.I have presented an objective workable theoryYou have not presented a theory.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 09:37:50
NFEU MODEL ( Neutral Field Electrical Universe) continued....
K0
Diagram 7 - Alpha wave/Beta wave , energy particle C convergence.
The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract math demonstrates:
This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle. Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle. This action in affect causing the binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy . The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of K space.
To be continued....
Ignoring the background white noise of the forum....
The NFUE model continues and describes that the epicenter of the proposed electrical neutral generated black hole field, undergoes point density where the epicenter point singularity has a steady state inflow of Alpha and /or Beta waves.
Diagram 8 - Inflow/expansion Causality
The NFUE model proposes that after an undefined period of time, the density point may of reached critical mass and core breach, this in affect causing a secondary big bang, which can be considered to be the present big bang model theory and creation of particles.
To be continued....
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 10:19:02
core breachI think Star Trek may have a copyright on that phrase.
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 10:21:53
You have not presented a theory; new, or otherwise.Correct MR C, I have presented a new theory , which it is quite apparent, nobody has objected to in the ways of trying to falsify it.I have presented an objective workable theoryYou have not presented a theory.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 10:25:08
How absurd, you can't copyright a physical fact, that is stupid! Nobody can tell me what words I can or can't use, that is ridiculous and I would happily challenge any copyright, rip it apart and make the whole thing look rather stupid. Copyrights like that are garbage and to be blunt, I could not care less .core breachI think Star Trek may have a copyright on that phrase.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 10:27:15
You have not presented a theory; new, or otherwise.
You have not presented any scientific counter argument what so ever, a lack of defense is the proof of proof.
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 11:51:17
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process. Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language' I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 11:59:17
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process. Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language' I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.
It is not pigeon chess, you just don't understand the math(s) because it is new math(s) and you are not use to it. The exact same as I am not use to some of ''your'' math(s). My math(s) works with my theory , so therefore it is a valid theory , I have demonstrated nothingness math(s) that works. If you have any better suggestions how we approach the math(s) for nothingness, then I am happy to listen.
added: The Alpha or Beta point ''particle'' annihilates itself and disperses into K space. Hence
, how can that be hard to understand when it only involves 2 letters.
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 12:08:15
Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process. Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language' I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.
It is not pigeon chess, you just don't understand the math(s) because it is new math(s) and you are not use to it. The exact same as I am not use to some of ''your'' math(s). My math(s) works with my theory , so therefore it is a valid theory , I have demonstrated nothingness math(s) that works. If you have any better suggestions how we approach the math(s) for nothingness, then I am happy to listen.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 12:22:42
Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.
Not at all, you are failing to have your own creative ability and looking at my math(s) from your memory mind experience. You are not considering that E=mc² did not even exist until Einstein created it to fit the process of energy. Your mind is not comprehending the new part of the math(s). Your brain is not processing the word new , you are focusing on old math(s) .
Let us not get irate at each other, let us continue nicely to each other. Can we start here :
-0.5q + 0.5 q = N q
Firstly do you agree with this equation ? Where q is charge and N is neutral
My other calculations are:
A+B = m1
m1 + A + B = m1^2
How is that wrong ?
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .
Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase flux range is decimal 3 to 5
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 13:31:26
Of course Einstein's equation did not exist! I am not arguing that!!! You are trying to redefine what mathematical operators such as division are to suit you. This is not how maths works - it is a common language. Einstein did did not redefine what multiplication was. Furthermore, his equation could be easily, conceptually explained which demonstrated how it related to his theroy. Yours cannot because it is made up, using made up maths. It is like dealing with Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland.
Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.
Not at all, you are failing to have your own creative ability and looking at my math(s) from your memory mind experience. You are not considering that E=mc² did not even exist until Einstein created it to fit the process of energy. Your mind is not comprehending the new part of the math(s). Your brain is not processing the word new , you are focusing on old math(s) .
Let us not get irate at each other, let us continue nicely to each other. Can we start here :
-0.5q + 0.5 q = N q
Firstly do you agree with this equation ? Where q is charge and N is neutral
My other calculations are:
A+B = m1
m1 + A + B = m1^2
How is that wrong ?
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .
Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase flux range is decimal 3 to 5
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 13:33:57
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what anions and cations are?
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what cations and anions are?
Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase flux range is decimal 3 to 5
The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 13:40:29
The NFUE model proposes that after an undefined period of time, the density point may of reached critical mass and core breach, this in affect causing a secondary big bang, which can be considered to be the present big bang model theory and creation of particles.Let us now consider a few other points of the NFUE model not mentioned thus far. We should take note that the inflow Alpha and Beta wave energy traversing to the binary C particle core point, is proposed to be traversing from multiple directions centripetally to the core point. The NFUE model also proposes that the electrical neutral black hole field can be considered to be the Higg's field or space-time, both notions having similarities to the NFUE model.
To be continued.....
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 13:43:40
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what anions and cations are?2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what cations and anions are?
Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase flux range is decimal 3 to 5
The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.
Of course I know what anions and cations are, the last sentence is not nonsense, again , you have just not heard it before so at this time do not understand it . I am not trying to be awkward...
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 13:46:00
Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what anions and cations are?2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .Do you know what cations and anions are?
Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase flux range is decimal 3 to 5
The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.
Of course I know what anions and cations are, the last sentence is not nonsense, again , you have just not heard it before so at this time do not understand it . I am not trying to be awkward...
When I read a book I always encounter sentences that I have not read before - they make sense. If that sentence makes sense then explain it.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 13:49:51
This is not how maths works - it is a common languageHmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works. Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ? Think about that ...
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 13:50:33
Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.Positive or negative charged atoms....
Like A + B = H (hydrogen), not a sentence related to the above.
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 13:58:15
That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.This is not how maths works - it is a common languageHmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works. Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ? Think about that ...
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 14:00:37
You sure it is just atoms?Explain what you think anions and cations are are then.Positive or negative charged atoms....
Like A + B = H (hydrogen), not a sentence related to the above.
A+B=Hydrogen does not mean anything. What are you adding to what to make hydrogen? Without defining terms, it is a jumble of letters.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 14:02:57
Oh please, if you have 2 apples and you divide them by two people, they get one each. If you a volume of infinite space there is no 1 value so we cant say A+B/1 because there is no one , so we have to say A+B/K because there is also no time until A becomes a binary with B, then time beings and then we can say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = 2 , but we could also say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = ^∞ because the process is without limits.That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.This is not how maths works - it is a common languageHmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works. Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ? Think about that ...
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 14:08:17
So it cannot be mathematically represented then? Why do you persist in trying to do so by making up equations and redifining operators? Pigeon chess.Oh please, if you have 2 apples and you divide them by two people, they get one each. If you a volume of infinite space there is no 1 value so we cant say A+B/1 because there is no one , so we have to say A+B/K because there is also no time until A becomes a binary with B, then time beings and then we can say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = 2 , but we could also say (A+B) + A/t + B/t = ^∞ because the process is without limits.That is obviously nonsense. You seem to not understand what division is in mathematics.This is not how maths works - it is a common languageHmm, sorry but maths works the way we make it fit, that is how all maths works. Are you saying that I and you are not presently divided by space ? Think about that ...
Enough of this - work to do and money to earn.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 14:12:09
So it cannot be mathematically represented then?It is mathematically represented, I suppose a Maxwell type may be able to improve on it . Let me put in a value see if it helps you
= 0 = 0 Dispersed to 0 values.
Then lets try
= 1Then finally
+ 
+ 
= 2added- Indeed that reads 1+0+0=2
Makes on interesting angled pattern of numbers
1+0+0=2
1+0+0+0+0=3
1+0+0+0+0+0+0=4
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=5
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 16:10:17
You have not presented any scientific counter argument what so ever, a lack of defense is the proof of proof.Wrong on two counts.
Firstly, as I already pointed out, I can't put forward a counter argument- because none of what you say makes sense.
Secondly, as TheSpoon pointed out, "Because people have learned by past experience it is just pigeon chess."
How absurd, you can't copyright a physical fact,You have yet to cite a physical fact.
But you do seem to have quoted Star Trek.
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 16:31:47
Indeed that reads 1+0+0=2Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
Makes on interesting angled pattern of numbers
1+0+0=2
1+0+0+0+0=3
1+0+0+0+0+0+0=4
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=5
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 16:36:28
1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=6OK, so according to that ,if I give you a dollar, and then I give you zero dollars on 10 occasions, you will have six dollars.
In which case, you can give me 3 dollars and still be up on the deal.
Can we play this game in real life please?
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 17:11:36
Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 18:01:20
Adding 0 to 1 and getting 2 is mathematically illiterate. You cannot add nothing to something and get an increase. Likewise division does not mean in the context of maths something is separated from something. That is putting something into a different set.Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFUE model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 18:06:12
you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.I have shown you exactly why your "maths" is plainly wrong.
Adding nothing to something doesn't make it bigger.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 18:21:20
I think you mean to say that I am not using conventional maths that you are accustomed too. That does not mean my maths is incorrect, it simply means it is new and you have not learnt to understand it yet.Adding 0 to 1 and getting 2 is mathematically illiterate. You cannot add nothing to something and get an increase. Likewise division does not mean in the context of maths something is separated from something. That is putting something into a different set.Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFUE model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 18:26:12
In the NFEU model it is demonstrated , why are you using the term nothing ? 0 is not nothing ...0 is fractionally 0 magnitude energy.you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate.I have shown you exactly why your "maths" is plainly wrong.
Adding nothing to something doesn't make it bigger.
The binary manifested energy C particle is the convergence point of Alpha and Beat waves, an Alpha wave and Beta wave density reformer .
Post by: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 19:00:04
(1) you need to say so.
(2) you need to explain what it is and how it is all consistent and
(3) you should stop using the symbols of ordinary maths to avoid confusion.
Step 2 will probably take a decade or two. I suggest you start by defining what you use as numbers and the rules for addition.
Until you do that none of your "stuff" will make any sense.
And, since you have not done it yet, none of your stuff can make sense.
You have demonstrated why I have been correct all along.
Come back with a clear explanation of the maths you are using.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 19:28:59
(1) you need to say so.The NFEU model has already explained , however the NFUE model can explain the math in a different form :
(2) you need to explain what it is and how it is all consistent and
+ 
+ 
= 
E1 =
+
E2 =
=m^1
m^1 + m1/2 + m1/2 = m^2
Additionally
= 
The NFEU model also explains
* * = 
=m^nTo be continued...
Post by: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 21:25:05
This is like a child saying 'you can't speak to my imaginary friend because they use a language that only I can understand'.Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
Post by: guest39538 on 28/08/2018 22:49:52
Shhh, they might here you :) Seriously though, think how long relativity etc as been around and people still do not understand that . I would not expect anybody to automatic accept my theory without actually understanding it. I am not totally sure, but I think the NFEU model is one of a kind and as not been done before. It may have a few glitches as I am writing live and have done no real editing as yet. As you are only really questioning the maths I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory . I have recently changed the maths to a different version, do you understand that version ?This is like a child saying 'you can't speak to my imaginary friend because they use a language that only I can understand'.Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
Post by: Bored chemist on 29/08/2018 02:01:36
Come back with a clear explanation of the maths you are using.
Post by: Bored chemist on 29/08/2018 02:03:40
I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory .It is , as I have pointed out, impossible to judge the theory because it makes no sense.
It won't make sense unless, and until, you provide the maths.
Post by: guest39538 on 29/08/2018 14:11:46
I have provided the maths......anyway , net gone off again already, got 50 quid council tax bill to find, school uniforms and have 0 in money. I think I have spent enough on science with the internet over the years, a poor investment of time and money. I might as well quit for good. Laters dude I think I might take up street robbery or something, I don't see hard criminals struggling for cash on the streets why I sit here learning , learning how to waste my time and money .I assume you have no objection and understand the actual theory .It is , as I have pointed out, impossible to judge the theory because it makes no sense.
It won't make sense unless, and until, you provide the maths.
Post by: guest39538 on 29/08/2018 14:22:32
Post by: Bored chemist on 29/08/2018 14:57:52
I have provided the maths.No, you have not.
You have not provided an explanation of what you claim, not ay way of generalising it.
Post by: guest39538 on 29/08/2018 15:06:55
Dude think about what we are discussing here , it is not rocket science, the next time I manage get some cash, whenever I don't know, how about we meet for coffee and I tell you all about it. . I will catch a train ....I can show you using a salt shaker in a cafe....then you can help with the maths then we go get noble prize , joint effort.Quote from: Thebox link=topic=74j576.msg552315#msg552315 date=1535548306I have provided the maths.No, you have not.
You have not provided an explanation of what you claim, not ay way of generalising it.
Post by: Bored chemist on 29/08/2018 15:16:27
you can help with the mathsUnlike you , I understand how difficult that would be.
I'm not going to waste my time on it.
If you really think you can then start off with this new variation of maths where zero is no longer the identity operator under addition.
Show us how it works, then, when people can understand it, try to show how it works in this nwe idea you have.
Start with the basics.
Post by: guest39538 on 29/08/2018 16:33:24
Take a salt shaker and shake some salt particles onto a plate, the particles separate , are divided , ask your self what divides these particles ? Answer is space....Sorry dude it is a struggle post proper without my pc , and I am under a lot of stress, did you know a school uniform costs over 100 quid because of school emblems on jumpers etc, times 2 in the household.. I'm fuming by this ....you can help with the mathsUnlike you , I understand how difficult that would be.
I'm not going to waste my time on it.
If you really think you can then start off with this new variation of maths where zero is no longer the identity operator under addition.
Show us how it works, then, when people can understand it, try to show how it works in this nwe idea you have.
Start with the basics.
Added , take a sphere, slit into 4 segments, split each segment into four, keep repeati g, eventually you are left with 0 degrees.
Post by: guest39538 on 30/08/2018 12:14:42
+
+
=
Post by: Bored chemist on 30/08/2018 14:28:33
eventually you are left with 0 degrees.No, you are not.
Post by: Bored chemist on 30/08/2018 14:35:13
Trivialy false unless n=1
multiply both sides by n
You get a+b +an +bn = 2an +2bn
and that only works for n=1
This is the problem- your maths isn't good enough to deal with the stuff we do know (and learned at school), yet you think you can do better.
Post by: guest39538 on 30/08/2018 15:00:48
You did not learn my theory at school and you don't know this stuff , one of a kind my friend . You are correct n=1 and is a dimensional whole I.e infinite. Or to put another way a singularity , one space. I have explained the maths three different ways now , do we really need a forth way or even a fith way to explain it ? The last equation is infinity.Trivialy false unless n=1
multiply both sides by n
You get a+b +an +bn = 2an +2bn
and that only works for n=1
This is the problem- your maths isn't good enough to deal with the stuff we do know (and learned at school), yet you think you can do better.
P.s trying put my internet back on, speak proper soon, I learnt myself this stuff on line, mainly here.Neurodynamics of cognitive thought is the NGI construct of one's own self belief.
Post by: Bored chemist on 30/08/2018 15:28:07
You did not learn my theory at schoolAnd, since you flatly refuse (or are unable) to explain it here, nobody is ever going to learn about it.
Come back when something changes.
Post by: guest39538 on 30/08/2018 16:04:06
It is explained , it is not difficult to understand, but to add.You did not learn my theory at schoolAnd, since you flatly refuse (or are unable) to explain it here, nobody is ever going to learn about it.
Come back when something changes.
The NFEU reminds us at this stage that the initial universe is proposed to be an infinite volume of nothingness that contained no thing.
Additionally the NFEU model proposed that the rudiment energy and ongoing power of the universe was an electrostatic point charge that dissipates into the infinite space,
reducing in magnitude by being dispersed to a ''point'' where the values become 0. The NFEU model also proposed the process is multiple and give name of micro bangs
which resulted in either Alpha or Beta waves dissipate from self annihilation, this reflecting on the Dirac notion of particles popping into and out of existence.
In preliminary acceptance of this, the model then further deducts a simultaneous process , where the Alpha point and Beta point charge manifest at the
same geometrical point to form a binary energy particle which we give name, the binary energy C particle. Continuing from this, the NFEU model proposed that on the instant
of manifestation of the binary energy C particle, the pre-existing alpha and beta wave dissipate energy, centripetally is attracted to the binary energy C particle.
This energy then adding to the binary energy C particle, to increase the mass and form an expanded Black hole neutral electrical field . The model then goes on to explain the
binary energy C particle reaches critical mass to the eventuality of a big bang.
To add a further set of maths explaining the same thing....
+ 
+
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/08/2018 09:54:10
It is explainedWhere?
Do you think you can teach a child what multiplication means by just telling them that 123 * 456 = 56008 ?
That's more or less what you have done here.
You have given a single example, and not explained how you got to the answer.
Show your working.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/08/2018 11:13:57
I have shown my working.It is explainedWhere?
Do you think you can teach a child what multiplication means by just telling them that 123 * 456 = 56008 ?
That's more or less what you have done here.
You have given a single example, and not explained how you got to the answer.
Show your working.
I assigned values to my theory actions to give me something to work with, then I just needed to put order to the chaos of values. Was not that difficult to create some working maths.
Example ; I give the value A to a negative electrostatic charge,the negative charge disperses into space which I gave value K or n, doesnt really matter, so A/n explains that part. Then so on...
added-
E1/n
then
E2/n
That gives us the quanta ''soup'' that then needs to reform. So then I just needed to find a reformer ,
E1 + E2 / t or n
Which makes gravity work and makes the ''soup'' attracted to the reformer.
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/08/2018 11:16:10
I assigned values to
As I said, it's like assigning the value 55088 to 123 * 456.
You failed to explain why you chose that value.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/08/2018 11:40:35
Huh? I am not following you, I used my values because they were the values to use , are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ? Which I am not....I assigned values to
As I said, it's like assigning the value 55088 to 123 * 456.
You failed to explain why you chose that value.
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/08/2018 11:43:04
I used my values because they were the values to use ,Why?
are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ?Yes, or at least, without explaining why the answer answers the question.
If I tell you that the trace of the matrix
1 0
0 1
is 2 then what I'm telling you is right, but it doesn't tell you what a trace is.
And, if I talk about "trace analysis" people are going to think in terms of chemistry, rather than maths unless I make it clear.
What you have done is make up meanings for well recognised symbols like "+" and use them for something else- without being able to explain what that "something" is and without, it seems, even recognising that you need to explain it.
Until you realise you are failing, you are not going to succeed.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/08/2018 11:47:35
Why ? Because that is what I used.. In the beginning there had to be some sort of manifestation of energy , obvious in science we use the E value for energy. I learnt this stuff dude, put it together .I used my values because they were the values to use ,Why?are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ?Yes, or at least, without explaining why the answer answers the question.
If I tell you that the determinant of the matrix
1
.
1 whole, there is 1 infinite in example....
added - how long is 1 piece of string....see
Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string, and the dot becomes as long as the piece of string...
How about :
E1³ / n³ + E2³ / n³ = S
To be honest my friend, I have no idea where this maths is coming from , I am just doing it. There is something wrong with me, its called being a super genius..... :P
And no I am not using my super super MK rifle to force the idea on anyone, it works dude.... :)
So with values 0.5 ,
S= 1 and is any dimension ...
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/08/2018 13:02:39
Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,Srsly?
Post by: guest39538 on 31/08/2018 13:16:53
The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,Srsly?
Post by: Kryptid on 31/08/2018 18:23:55
Srsly?
So if I divide an apple pie by an aircraft carrier, the apple pie becomes as long as the aircraft carrier. We've just discovered the solution to the problem of world hunger.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/08/2018 18:55:31
Not quite, but if you divide a point charge by your air craft carrier, the energy will become a part of the total energy /entropy of the isolated system. As you know things reach room temperature by the laws of thermodynamics, hence the energy spreads out evenly in a system trying to retain an equilibrium throughout the system, higher energy passive to lower energy states and vice versus. To express your aircraft carrier and point chargeSrsly?
So if I divide an apple pie by an aircraft carrier, the apple pie becomes as long as the aircraft carrier. We've just discovered the solution to the problem of world hunger.
ΔS = ΔE
where E is energy and S is entropy. Post by: Bored chemist on 01/09/2018 01:56:04
The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.Srsly?
Post by: guest39538 on 01/09/2018 02:09:57
Space is the string in the example, you really need to use your imagination.The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.Srsly?
What is the purpose of repeating myself all the time , I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever.
The factor of this is x , what is the principle of locality compared to irrational interface of conjecture in the eye of perspective without interference of the bars of impracticable without literal meaning or purpose without knowing what on this earth is the actual principle behind the fundamentals of this paragraph with meaning intent to nothing other than solely bored and don't know what I am doing because of the principles of protocol in dimensions of 0 compared to existence of further anomalies within a finite universe of spag bolonase, mixed in with glorified noodles and hogwash in a state of had enough in regards to the everything and nothing of reality on Saturday which went before it was Sunday in the state of fried rice with curry and chips befor the salsa and the nachos in a cumberland sausage sauce mixed in with hard tunes and etiquette while dancing with my blue swede shoes from sweden in the valleys of timber falls because of the matter of chickens and eggs and what came first in an omelette when ram see got all technical and shouted at the chef while wearing a white hat for which he had no reason why nothing really happened.
Post by: guest39538 on 08/09/2018 16:18:41
To be continued,...
Post by: Bored chemist on 08/09/2018 16:27:12
I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever.You do.
Post by: guest39538 on 08/09/2018 16:36:32
I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever.You do.
Who are you trying to kid? People can read Mr Chemist, my model is a valid model like it or not.
Post by: guest39538 on 09/09/2018 15:54:41
Post by: Bored chemist on 09/09/2018 15:59:19
People can readHow many have supported this idea of yours?
Post by: guest39538 on 09/09/2018 16:27:43
The very fact that nobody has contested my notions , therefore shows my notions to be good theory and logically of sound mind and good physics.People can readHow many have supported this idea of yours?
You validate my notions by not arguing my notions. Show it to be wrong ?
Once you can see nothingness , physics is easy.
added: Take note : ourselves are far more complex than the infinite Universe will ever be.
Post by: Bored chemist on 09/09/2018 17:06:33
You validate my notions by not arguing my notions.Nonsense.
I might choose not to argue because I have better things to do.
But often it's because you say things that make no sense like "Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,"
It's like trying to answer the question "Is Thursday purple?" or trying to answer " left handed artichokes smell tunefully".
It's impossible to say anything about them except that they make no sense.
They are, as Pauli would have put it "not even wrong".
Post by: guest39538 on 09/09/2018 17:12:17
I might choose not to argue because I have better things to do.But you are arguing now in another way .
Let us rewind the NFUE model to the opening post,
Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?
Post by: Bored chemist on 09/09/2018 17:20:34
Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,
Post by: The Spoon on 09/09/2018 19:55:03
It is linguistic free form jazz.Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,
Post by: Bored chemist on 09/09/2018 21:42:45
What's it doing on a science page?It is linguistic free form jazz.Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,