The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. NFEU MODEL
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Down

NFEU MODEL

  • 117 Replies
  • 29707 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Marked as best answer by on 23/03/2022 17:25:15

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #40 on: 27/08/2018 22:18:43 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:14:33
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:09:45

So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?

The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.

Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model

b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t

This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle.  Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle.  This action in affect causing the  binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy .  The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of  K space.

What do you not understand ?

And how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #41 on: 27/08/2018 22:21:01 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:18:43
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:14:33
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:09:45

So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?

The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.

Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model

b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t

This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle.  Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle.  This action in affect causing the  binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy .  The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of  K space.

What do you not understand ?

And how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
A...........K..................B    A+B/K   


Ok so far?  You can consider K is infinite if you like.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #42 on: 27/08/2018 22:24:55 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:21:01
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:18:43
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:14:33
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:09:45

So explain the equation you posted above.
Who said the theory was workable?

The equation is simple and as already been explained and demonstrated.

Recalling the earlier math and explanation of the NFUE model

b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t

This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle.  Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle.  This action in affect causing the  binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy .  The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of  K space.

What do you not understand ?

And how does the equation demonstrate that? As you claim you are a 'genius' I am sure you will have no problem explaining in simple terms how your equation works to show this. Go on, walk me though it in baby steps.
A...........K..................B    A+B/K   


Ok so far?  You can consider K is infinite if you like.
No. Explain what that actually means instead of throwing together letters and claiming it is meaningful. An 'arbitary abstract equation' just means something you have made up. You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #43 on: 27/08/2018 22:36:24 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:24:55
You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.

I am not quite sure what you mean , so let me try again and start with Alpha waves

f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif


This represents the dissipate into a n -dimensional K space. Can you understand that part?

We could also say divided by force 1,  but I prefer space.

added- imagine me and you are A and we split up , we are divided by space yes?
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #44 on: 27/08/2018 22:49:59 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:36:24
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:24:55
You need to show how your 'equation' demonstrates what you claim it does.

I am not quite sure what you mean , so let me try again and start with Alpha waves

f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif


This represents the dissipate into a n -dimensional K space. Can you understand that part?

We could also say divided by force 1,  but I prefer space.

added- imagine me and you are A and we split up , we are divided by space yes?
That is not how division works as a mathematical operation....
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #45 on: 27/08/2018 23:00:55 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/08/2018 22:49:59

That is not how division works as a mathematical operation....

Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process.  Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process. I got 0.5 + 0.5 = 1 and I have got 1+0.5+0.5 = 2 , I see that is correct...also I have -0.5q + 0.5q = N q which is correct

We could say 53e66c44a0438df52f109786fcdc3346.gif  but remembering this is a single micro bang value.

f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif represents multiple micro bangs and the accumulative of alpha waves in general.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #46 on: 28/08/2018 09:02:11 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:05:21
I have presented an objective workable theory
You have not presented a theory.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #47 on: 28/08/2018 09:10:56 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 09:02:11
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:05:21
I have presented an objective workable theory
You have not presented a theory.

Correct MR C, I have presented a new theory , which it is quite apparent, nobody has objected to in the ways of trying to falsify it.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #48 on: 28/08/2018 09:37:50 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 21:43:08
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 17:00:34
NFEU MODEL ( Neutral Field Electrical Universe) continued....

K0

Diagram 7 - Alpha wave/Beta wave , energy particle C convergence.


* diagram 7.jpg (135.11 kB . 2952x1364 - viewed 7467 times)

The NFUE model in arbitrary abstract math demonstrates:

b1d9c7434fa477a85538bb64c088c3e5.gif + f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif + ef0d52bf59a19b3b670eff16550ddb0e.gif = 2/t

This math explains that our singularity A+B which is a new formed mass now has gravitational force, as a consequent of this, the NFUE model proposes that any pre-existed Alpha waves and/or Beta waves by the laws of attraction would traverse through K space to the singularity point of our binary energy C particle.  Thus an inflow of wave energy of either assigned polarity attracted to the denser energy point of the binary energy C particle.  This action in affect causing the  binary energy C particle to increase in mass , in affect expanding/growing creating an outflow energy .  The NFUE model considers this event may be the creation of a finite black hole in a greater volume of  K space.



To be continued....



Ignoring the background white noise of the forum....

The NFUE model continues   and describes that the epicenter of the proposed electrical neutral  generated black hole field, undergoes point density where the epicenter point singularity has a steady state  inflow of Alpha and /or Beta waves. 

Diagram 8 - Inflow/expansion Causality


* Diagram 8.jpg (142.74 kB . 2952x1364 - viewed 7404 times)




The NFUE model proposes that after an undefined period of time,  the density point  may of reached critical mass and core breach, this in affect causing a secondary big bang,  which can be considered to be the present big bang model theory and creation of particles. 

To be continued....
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #49 on: 28/08/2018 10:19:02 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 09:37:50
core breach
I think Star Trek may have a copyright on that phrase.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #50 on: 28/08/2018 10:21:53 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 09:10:56
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 09:02:11
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 22:05:21
I have presented an objective workable theory
You have not presented a theory.

Correct MR C, I have presented a new theory , which it is quite apparent, nobody has objected to in the ways of trying to falsify it.
You have not presented a theory; new, or otherwise.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #51 on: 28/08/2018 10:25:08 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 10:19:02
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 09:37:50
core breach
I think Star Trek may have a copyright on that phrase.

How absurd, you can't copyright a physical fact, that is stupid!  Nobody can tell me what words I can or can't use, that is ridiculous and I would happily challenge any copyright, rip it apart and make the whole thing look rather stupid. Copyrights like that are garbage and to be blunt, I could not care less .
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #52 on: 28/08/2018 10:27:15 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/08/2018 10:21:53

You have not presented a theory; new, or otherwise.

You have not presented any scientific counter argument what so ever, a lack of defense is the proof of proof.
Logged
 



Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #53 on: 28/08/2018 11:51:17 »
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 23:00:55
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process.  Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.
Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language'  I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #54 on: 28/08/2018 11:59:17 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 11:51:17
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 23:00:55
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process.  Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.
Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language'  I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.

It is not pigeon chess, you just don't understand the math(s) because it is new math(s) and you are not use to it.  The exact same as I am not use to some of ''your'' math(s).  My math(s) works with my theory , so therefore it is a valid theory , I have demonstrated nothingness math(s) that works.  If you have any better suggestions how we approach the math(s) for nothingness, then I am happy to listen.

added: The Alpha or Beta point ''particle'' annihilates itself and disperses into K space.  Hence f32c567c9131354f9bed22336fbbf932.gif, how can that be hard to understand when it only involves 2 letters.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #55 on: 28/08/2018 12:08:15 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 11:59:17
Quote from: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 11:51:17
Quote from: Thebox on 27/08/2018 23:00:55
Perhaps not, but it is how it works in the NFUE model as the model understands when working with nothingness, maths does not even exist until some maths is created to fit the process.  Hence my own maths that is simple to understand that does explain the process.
Ah - I wondered how long it would be before something was pointed out that was obviously incorrect and you said 'but I don't use conventional maths/science/Language'  I use my own. As I said, pigeon chess.

It is not pigeon chess, you just don't understand the math(s) because it is new math(s) and you are not use to it.  The exact same as I am not use to some of ''your'' math(s).  My math(s) works with my theory , so therefore it is a valid theory , I have demonstrated nothingness math(s) that works.  If you have any better suggestions how we approach the math(s) for nothingness, then I am happy to listen.
Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #56 on: 28/08/2018 12:22:42 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 12:08:15

Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.

Not at all, you are failing to  have your own creative ability and looking at my math(s) from your memory mind experience.  You are not considering that E=mc² did not even exist until Einstein created it to fit the process of energy.  Your mind is not comprehending the new part of the math(s).  Your brain is not processing the word new , you are focusing on old math(s) . 
Let us not get irate at each other, let us continue nicely to each other.  Can we start here :

-0.5q + 0.5 q  = N q

Firstly do you agree with this equation ? Where q is charge and N is neutral

My other calculations are:

A+B = m1 

m1  + A + B = m1^2

How is that wrong ?

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .


Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase  flux range is decimal 3 to 5




Logged
 



Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #57 on: 28/08/2018 13:31:26 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 12:22:42
Quote from: The Spoon on 28/08/2018 12:08:15

Bullshit. You are incapable of even simple maths so you make up 'new maths' to obfuscate in an attempt to make people think you are saying something profound. Division is division, as addition is addition etc. It your lack of basic scientific, mathematical knowledge that is the problem pigeon.

Not at all, you are failing to  have your own creative ability and looking at my math(s) from your memory mind experience.  You are not considering that E=mc² did not even exist until Einstein created it to fit the process of energy.  Your mind is not comprehending the new part of the math(s).  Your brain is not processing the word new , you are focusing on old math(s) . 
Let us not get irate at each other, let us continue nicely to each other.  Can we start here :

-0.5q + 0.5 q  = N q

Firstly do you agree with this equation ? Where q is charge and N is neutral

My other calculations are:

A+B = m1 

m1  + A + B = m1^2

How is that wrong ?

2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .


Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase  flux range is decimal 3 to 5





Of course Einstein's equation did not exist! I am not arguing that!!! You are trying to redefine what mathematical operators such as division are to suit you. This is not how maths works - it is a common language. Einstein did did not redefine what multiplication was. Furthermore, his equation could be easily, conceptually explained which demonstrated how it related to his theroy. Yours cannot because it is made up, using made up maths. It is like dealing with Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #58 on: 28/08/2018 13:33:57 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 12:22:42
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .
Do you know what anions and cations are?
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 12:22:42
2,4,6,8,10,12......etc all being N where all odd numbers become anions or cations .


Take 4 in example , the equilibrium phase  flux range is decimal 3 to 5
Do you know what cations and anions are?

The last sentence is your usual word salad nonsense, pigeon.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: NFEU MODEL
« Reply #59 on: 28/08/2018 13:40:29 »
Quote from: Thebox on 28/08/2018 09:37:50
The NFUE model proposes that after an undefined period of time,  the density point  may of reached critical mass and core breach, this in affect causing a secondary big bang,  which can be considered to be the present big bang model theory and creation of particles. 
Let us now consider a few other points of the NFUE model not mentioned thus far.  We should take note that the inflow Alpha and Beta wave energy traversing to the binary C particle core point, is proposed to be traversing from multiple directions centripetally to the core point.  The NFUE model also proposes that the electrical neutral black hole field can be considered to be the Higg's field or space-time, both notions having similarities to the NFUE model.

To be continued.....
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: pigeon chess  / made up maths 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.419 seconds with 72 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.