0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 09/09/2017 13:51:06I'll answer the original question since the rest is nonsense. The planet goes through cycles. We cannot avoid that. A cycle can be modified by other inputs. These include volcanic eruptions for instance. Our role is becoming more apparent as time goes on. We are turning a gradual cycle that is easy to adapt to into something a lot less manageable. I personally don't think we know what it is we are doing exactly to cause this. However it is likely to not be just output of CO2.ΔS over time is causing this Jeffrey, you know that!
I'll answer the original question since the rest is nonsense. The planet goes through cycles. We cannot avoid that. A cycle can be modified by other inputs. These include volcanic eruptions for instance. Our role is becoming more apparent as time goes on. We are turning a gradual cycle that is easy to adapt to into something a lot less manageable. I personally don't think we know what it is we are doing exactly to cause this. However it is likely to not be just output of CO2.
Evapouration is not calculated by the ammount of energy released,
In my answer evapouration is not calculated by the ammount of energy taken from the earths surface bu way of evapourative cooling, thus reducing the emmisive radiation into space that would normaly remove that energy out of the atmospheric system.My evaporation is calculated bu the moisture holding content saturation of airhttps://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/moisture-holding-capacity-air-d_281.htmlDid you know that ev3n though himidity changes, this over a short period of hours is likely to be "dew" to the changee in temperature and not a change in content volume, wet land and rain not with standing.Also did you know wind and humidity content govern in evapouration far more than temperature ?A wach pot never boils because you are constantly allowing evapourat8v3 cooling
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/02/2018 09:07:29In my answer evapouration is not calculated by the ammount of energy taken from the earths surface bu way of evapourative cooling, thus reducing the emmisive radiation into space that would normaly remove that energy out of the atmospheric system.My evaporation is calculated bu the moisture holding content saturation of airhttps://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/moisture-holding-capacity-air-d_281.htmlDid you know that ev3n though himidity changes, this over a short period of hours is likely to be "dew" to the changee in temperature and not a change in content volume, wet land and rain not with standing.Also did you know wind and humidity content govern in evapouration far more than temperature ?A wach pot never boils because you are constantly allowing evapourat8v3 coolingI would not be too sure that burning fossil fuels would have anything to do with global warming. By burning fossil fuels we are only transforming the energy from one form to another, so the entropy of the system does not change. In other words, a piece of coal contains an amount of energy , transforming this energy does not change the amount of energy . If anything , burning fossil fuels releases some of the energy into space , the entropy within the earths field would be less. You could argue the carbon emissions absorb energy , but so does the piece of coal you started with. What is actually happening is a Universal warming, therefore all things within the observable Universe are warming. All things want to reach room temperature relative to the field density.
Quote from: Thebox on 12/02/2018 10:16:13Quote from: Petrochemicals on 12/02/2018 09:07:29In my answer evapouration is not calculated by the ammount of energy taken from the earths surface bu way of evapourative cooling, thus reducing the emmisive radiation into space that would normaly remove that energy out of the atmospheric system.My evaporation is calculated bu the moisture holding content saturation of airhttps://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/moisture-holding-capacity-air-d_281.htmlDid you know that ev3n though himidity changes, this over a short period of hours is likely to be "dew" to the changee in temperature and not a change in content volume, wet land and rain not with standing.Also did you know wind and humidity content govern in evapouration far more than temperature ?A wach pot never boils because you are constantly allowing evapourat8v3 coolingI would not be too sure that burning fossil fuels would have anything to do with global warming. By burning fossil fuels we are only transforming the energy from one form to another, so the entropy of the system does not change. In other words, a piece of coal contains an amount of energy , transforming this energy does not change the amount of energy . If anything , burning fossil fuels releases some of the energy into space , the entropy within the earths field would be less. You could argue the carbon emissions absorb energy , but so does the piece of coal you started with. What is actually happening is a Universal warming, therefore all things within the observable Universe are warming. All things want to reach room temperature relative to the field density. What utter nonsense. You have demonstrated that you know less about the subject than Donald Trump.