0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Wave propagation exist as presented in your last diagram. This was establish by voyager upon entering the heliosphere that separates the solar system from interstellar space. You may be familiar with these reports. if not they may interest you.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5383.pdfhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/267492/what-does-the-cosmic-neutrino-background-look-like-today-given-that-neutrinos-p
The structure of the Universe as represented in pictorial form, appear as a lattice of lights separated by areas/boundaries of obscure space. What is portrayed is Light separated. If light at one time was completely homogenous, a conclusion can be made that the dark obscure areas are separating light. The question then becomes the purpose or result of/for the separation. lolA bubble structure is conducive to separation and breaking apart. A wave front consisting of such a bubble structure is susceptible to separation. lol
Bogie, agreement on matters is never necessary. Please allow me to explain my approach. Quantum and Mathematics are very different endeavours. Quantum deals with infinte possibilities, Mathematics is functional probablities, Quantum rules provides a means to explain what Mathematic functions cannot. Some may offer a Mathematical formula that is entirely valid, meaning it works out to having a true value. However; having a true value is not always indicative of of the right answer/solution to the problem, meaning it is a dead end. Quantum has the same issue, its use may apply rules that meet a conclusion but that conclusion may not be optimum, rendering it inconclusive. Both become an artful science of using the process of elimination towards the ultimate goal. What is necessary, is the initiation of such processes. Some may be dead ends but others may bear fruit. We don't always know which is which. But in initiating the process, we are opening an exploration into functional probabilities and the deeper possibilities, that is the process of greater learning. Learning must always be a sharing experience or it becomes inconsequentially lost. Nobody can claim 100% certainty, so we all should be open to examination. It is often examination that produces the most refined product. I believe we all a share a sense about what rings true in regards to both probabilities and possibilities. It is a collective reasoning imbued in the human spirit, as such it has powered our innate capacities. It pushes us to push beyond our current abilities, in doing so it promotes common interest into a better future. I have as probably many here have questioned the possibility of multi Universe formations. Such things cannot be discounted as current observations only add to our knowledge. What i had not contemplated prior was using neutrino trajectories to confirm or discount the multi-Universe theory. If neutrinos trajectories are shown to come from regions of space that have no known sources of light, then yes, i believe we must entertain and explore the possibility that such a scenario exist. lolRegards
Bogie,. I find that people that require proof of evidence on this site are themselves the first to offer merely speculative theory as such evidence! lol
A zero sum environment where the below the well threshold potential, equals a negative aspect, -0. This creates a substrata drop where the energetic less than potential vs greater potential is excluded, via a lack of potential barrier (my bold). The well bottom aspect of a -0 (no potential) creates the zero sum bottom line, a below the well bottom. The potential that exist is finite. This finite potential is dynamic, for the lack of a better term, it exist as aspects of the four fundamental forces of nature. It is a closed loop environment containing infinite growth probabilities. As a zero sum closed loop environment with infinite growth probabilities, it's attribute nature is expansive growth. However, expansive growth must rely on a mechanism that controls and governs growth so as to regulate it's potential, a seed of destruction, if you will (my bold). So, what is quantum gravity? It may be easier to explain what quantum gravity does. Quantum gravity operates at the lowest level possible, it regulates every aspect/parameter of our physical and non-physical Universe. It regulates everything from the motion of the galaxies, to the shape of a star, to the growth of a flower, to the rules that govern light waves, to quantum rules that govern how quantum events alter each other to form new quantum events. In regulating growth, both as life and "non-life" growth as we know it, quantum gravity influences and regulates everything.Quantum gravity as -0 potential creates boundaries for any and all potential. It creates a below the well bottom that attracts potential yet impedes and recycles it by means of release (also my bold). Quantum gravity is not dynamic. It is however as constant and unchanging as Light itself. The question then becomes what came first, Light or Quantum gravity? Both exhibit close to infinite existence. If Light can be thought of as motion in it rudimentary condition, Quantum gravity can be thought of as embodying Light, allowing it to illuminate. In other words, without Quantum gravity, photonic Light wouldn't illuminate. In conclusion, without Quantum gravity there would be no charge, no spin, and no fields, the parameters that encompass quantum and standard physics.
Quantum physics provides variance in the mostly invariance closed GR system. When looking into possibilities no matter how improbable quantum provides the variance. So time delay requires a mechanism that supports the hiccup or disruption of normal flow.
Sometimes this can be found in GR via alternative other than quantum, but a further investigation is needed to determine the GR hiccup in an invariance environment. This path points in quantum gravity's direction.
Hi BogieCan the macro draw an analogy from the micro?
Ein sof draws an interesting correlation to the (Yah Weh)wave particle diagram. The randomness of the HEDSpots around the HDCore is acting as the variance in quantum gravity. E=hv where v as the frequency of radiation determines the randomness of HEDSpots pattern. This differs from your topological analogy of GR local gravity, but it's premise as a pictorial image is useful in visualizing quantum effects.
My visualization as to the clustering effects and the randomness of the HEDSpots around the HDcore invokes a 3D image of the Tetragrammaton! lolhttps://www.freeart.com/artwork/art-print/tetragrammaton-ineffable-name-of-god_fa10146712.htmlAs in your "Formation of a high density spot", the 3D tetragrammaton has a core concentration, and six separate linear directionalities that comprise the star. The linear directionalities correspond to your "multi-directional wave functions" surrounding the HDCore in the diagram. The HEDSpots pattern fall between the star's outer linear directionalities and its outer most circular boundary.
However, I read the randomness, as not random, but as a function of the linear directionalities, or to your "multi-directional wave functions". As such the HEDSpots around the HDcore can be predicted to also fall in a pattern that appears to be random. lol. This pattern would be a function of a dynamic radiation = v, in the equation E=hv. The h constant would be the "multi-directional wave functions". lol
The delay in time could be attributed to the 3D nature imposed on a 2D construct. The effects of radiation on waves. lol.
An additional component that is essential and must be visualized is the 3D aspects both models presented. The clustering of the "HEDSpots around the HDcore" must be a dynamic 3D representation, meaning that the model has spin and the random appearing HEDSpots fall into consolidated verifiable groupings. The difference in grouping counts could produce a barometer of the radiation v.
The constant h couldnot be used as analogous to the location, top of the mountain or bottom of the mountain as offered. The difference in time delay could than be imagined as the exact same model E=hv, used in both location, viewed from two different distinct perspectives, reporting similar results with miniscule but very verifiable differences. H must remain constant, what is constant is the "multi-directional wave functions" which must equal h.
The dynamic effect of radiation on wave location causing time delay is a possibility, but the double slot wave particle experiment is essentially a 2D result for an experiment that uses E=hv, and uses v as a constant. The experiment works in a strictly controlled experiment. Vary the frequency of v and the results as to where and how the HEDSpots cluster would alter. lol
Hi Bogie, I look at the double slit experiment as a parlor trick, I leave those that disagree to their own opinion. I'm not into trying to change minds. lol
On another related topic, delayed time. Quantum theory reports entangled particles as engaging instantaneously over distance, acting as a single particle in two separate locations.
QT also accepts that two or more particle fields can occupy the same time space location. These two positions share the attribute of particles simultaneously sharing multiple perspectives of time space in different formats. lol. Time delay represents a perspective of slowing time or time elongation. It's a perspective where time can be stretched, just as a light particle is stretched at the speed of light, but time carries no fermion or bosonic value. So, what does Quantum theory not address? Quantum time. lol
As evident in entangled particles or particles sharing the same space/time location, a sense of time is absent. Being that time is non-existant in quantum it implies that any quantum argument used to explain time delay is invalid. Therefore, the only cogent argument for explaining time delay falls strictly under the principles of Einstein's relativity. Therefore, E=hv is the overriding principle and must be applied in the double slit experiments. lol