0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: puppypower on 06/03/2022 16:48:05 Therefore you need to throw dice to account for the mystery of naked DNA being active.NoQuote from: puppypower on 06/03/2022 16:48:05What you said was correct;Well, I guess that makes one of us.Quote from: puppypower on 06/03/2022 16:48:05Water is unique in that has two hydrogen bonding donors and two hydrogen bonding acceptors.Not really; ethylene glycol has them too.
Therefore you need to throw dice to account for the mystery of naked DNA being active.
What you said was correct;
Water is unique in that has two hydrogen bonding donors and two hydrogen bonding acceptors.
Electrons have been found to be elementary particles. This means they are singular things that cannot be broken down any further.
Ethylene glycol is not a good solvent for life.
Oxygen is unique in that it can form oxide,
most of the criticisms in this new created topic do not answer evolution or the deniers, either.
My long post, that inspired this topic, attributed to me, tried to address the fundamentals of
This reminds me of a a recent situation where I could not get my password to work on another site; debate politics. I tries to rest the password, but for some reason, it reset onto a secondary account, that was against the rules. This was used as an excuse to silence my observations. I must be a threat to someone who can game system: political left.QuoteMaybe they just got tired of your rambling inaccurate posts. QuoteIf I disappear from here, is not of my making. Maybe I am paranoid but the pattern was the same.[/quoteI don't think you are paranoid, I think the pattern is there. You make long rambling posts with outlandish claims, the mods warn you to stop your silliness and you double down on your crazy posts. This cycle goes on a little while and then the mods get fed up and ban you. I have seen that happen to you on a couple other science sites. The mods here give a lot of leeway on pseudoscience but even they have limits. Personally, I think banning you would improve this site.
Maybe they just got tired of your rambling inaccurate posts. QuoteIf I disappear from here, is not of my making. Maybe I am paranoid but the pattern was the same.[/quoteI don't think you are paranoid, I think the pattern is there. You make long rambling posts with outlandish claims, the mods warn you to stop your silliness and you double down on your crazy posts. This cycle goes on a little while and then the mods get fed up and ban you. I have seen that happen to you on a couple other science sites. The mods here give a lot of leeway on pseudoscience but even they have limits. Personally, I think banning you would improve this site.
If I disappear from here, is not of my making. Maybe I am paranoid but the pattern was the same.[/quoteI don't think you are paranoid, I think the pattern is there. You make long rambling posts with outlandish claims, the mods warn you to stop your silliness and you double down on your crazy posts. This cycle goes on a little while and then the mods get fed up and ban you. I have seen that happen to you on a couple other science sites. The mods here give a lot of leeway on pseudoscience but even they have limits. Personally, I think banning you would improve this site.
This reminds me of a a recent situation where I could not get my password to work on another site; debate politics. I tries to rest the password, but for some reason, it reset onto a secondary account, that was against the rules. This was used as an excuse to silence my observations. I must be a threat to someone who can game system: political left.
If I disappear from here, is not of my making. Maybe I am paranoid but the pattern was the same.
Personally, I think banning you would improve this site.