0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That's determined by electromagnetism, not gravity. For example, the radius of a deuterium atom is very similar to that of protium, despite deuterium having approximately twice the mass and therefore twice the gravity.
The state, where the numbers of the stuck particle G in the Bubble is less than in the other stable state, are known as an electron and the other stable state is known as the proton. No other stable particles exist.
The number of electrons is over 20 already in the case of Hydrogen
The different velocities of the G particles colliding from different directions to the electron and proton cause gravity
I found logicaly mistake in relativity theory
The weak interaction does not exist
I saw an experiment, maked by a hungarian person in Brem, that show clearly that, the different type of elements fall down in the vacuum with different speed.
I declare in the theory, that the gravity is not universal, depend on the mass, elements type, temperature, velocity and acceleration of elements and more other parameters.
By DEU the gravity is not closely related to rest mass and depend on the rate of protons and electrons.
Say the mainstream phisycs.
Please, please, please if you don't want read my work
but just citating the statement of mainstream phisycs will not move us forward.
I know, if we stand my theory against the mainstream phisycs, the two will be in contradiction. This is the point!
I like thinking. In fact, I cant do not thinking about very komplex stuffs.
This statement, for example, is incorrect. Photons and neutrinos are also stable. Then you have the antimatter counterparts of the electron and proton, the positron and antiproton. To all current measurements, those particles are stable as well.
The weak interaction does not existIt's been measured and the particles that transmit it (Z bosons and W bosons) have been detected. We know it exists.
Existing experiments have shown that gravity is correlated to mass.
Care to expand on that?
Experiments currently support mainstream physics over your model.
Nobody saw positron or antiproton.
So you can messure it, but not an idividual interaction and don't come by bosons.
You don't know it, because you don't know my theory.
You try compare my theory (what you don't know) to the statement of mainstream.
So you can see, it is pointles compare the DEU to mainstream.
The DEU dosn't say the phenomenons don't exist.
. No other stable particles exist.
Nobody saw positron.
I once had scan which used the gamma rays produced by positrons to form an image of my heart.The gamma rays lit up the image, showing where the positrons were.
This is not a new theory and I have chance it can appers on a trusted site as news. So I will not
Every elements created when the particles G and the Bubbles summa energy level decrease. Then the particles G stuck into Bubble. The stable elements the elektron and the proton.
When the particle G number change in the element, the energy level of element changes. When the particles G accumlated in the elements or emited out from element, the particle G changes the oscillating of Bubble field. The oscillating of Bubble field is the temperature, and the oscillating of the Bubble field which spreads in the space is the electromagnetic wave.
The nucleus able create elements like electron.
So, by DEU the phenomenon exist, just not by an individual particles of positron