0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You keep saying that.It keeps not being true.You can burn through steel with a laser that's got a wavelength corresponding to a temperature of melting ice.You can cook a potato with microwave radiation that corresponds to a temperature that's massively below the temperature of liquid helium.
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/10/2021 20:37:42Can you tell me, what makes this statement wrong? What may make it wrong is that you deduce from it ideas which are demonstrable wrong, such as you can't get more than about 10^-15 watts in a microwave oven.Of course, it could be your deduction rather then the premise which is wrong.
Can you tell me, what makes this statement wrong?
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/10/2021 20:10:37Never said so... I've said that two FM antennas will cause interference, if they are placed close to each other.Yes, you made that error.You said "that you can't overlap two EM fields at the same bandwidths in one volume of space"And I pointed out that it is wrong.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=82373.msg644926;topicseen#msg644926Why are you still saying it, even though it is known to be wrong?
Never said so... I've said that two FM antennas will cause interference, if they are placed close to each other.
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/10/2021 23:06:49. For example, up until today I never heard of Wein's Law and Kirchhoff's Law - but I used them in practical scenario just by pure intuition And you got them monumentally wrong.You think you can melt steel with ice cubes.
. For example, up until today I never heard of Wein's Law and Kirchhoff's Law - but I used them in practical scenario just by pure intuition
Define serious...
So why don't you shut up?
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/10/2021 23:06:49Induction heating is based on a COMPLETELY different mechanism, than heating with a laser (or different radiation).No it isn't.In both cases EM radiation is transferred across an heats the object.
Induction heating is based on a COMPLETELY different mechanism, than heating with a laser (or different radiation).
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/10/2021 23:06:49Chapter 12: Radiation Heat Transfer. Radiation differs from Conduction and Convection heat t transfer mechanismsYes, that's right.Radiation in the form of light heats things in much the same way as radiation of RF from an induction furnace.It's different from conduction or convection (or advection, if you want the full set).
Chapter 12: Radiation Heat Transfer. Radiation differs from Conduction and Convection heat t transfer mechanisms
I'm pretty sure, that when somewhere it's being stated that something differs, it does not tranlate to things happening: in much the same way.
Stop telling me, what I do or don't think about different things - you're not somekind of a space-wizard, to see into my mind. Where did I say so?
Laser beams have wavelenghts that allows them to cut through metal.
You won't never go beyond a certain temperature for a certain wavelenght
Because I have a strong sense of inter-personal empathy and it gives me a twisted satisfaction, to feel your frustration and desperation of intellectual domination over me.
Because they can't overlap, since they interfere with each other.
And where exactly in our discussion did I state so?
you won't fit more than 3 to 6 microwave photons in the LENGHT of that cavity
That is still wrong by many orders of magnitude.Say it's 6 waves.(and 2.4 GHz as domestic microwaves generally are)And each photon carries 1.59×10^-24 joules.So there's only 6 times that much microwave radiation in the cavity at one time.And it crosses the cavity in about a nanosecond so you can "refresh" those 6 photons about 10^9 times a second.So the power carried is1.59×10^-15 watts.But my oven actually transfers about 10^3 wattsSo you are wrong by a factor of about a billion billion.Even allowing for the fact that there are other modes in the oven- vertical and "front to back", it stuill isn't going to work.You are wrong by about a factor of a hundred thousand million million.I pointed this out before and you didn't address it.
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 06/08/2021 23:12:36Inside a 1D tube, which is 100cm long, you can succesfully trap as much as 1 photon of 100cm wavelenght and/or 2 photons at 100//2cm wavelenght + 3 photons at 100/3cm wavelenght + 4 photons at 100/4cm wavelenght and so on.An interesting conjecture.Consider my microwave oven.It runs at 2.4GHz with a corresponding wavelength of about 12.5 cmEach photon carries about 1.6E-24 Joules.It is rated for 900 watts.So it produces about 5.6 E 26 photons per second.and it's about 15 inches wide So the cavity is 3 wavelengths long.According to you it can therefore contain 3 photons of microwave radiation at any given time.But in reality, about 10^27 photons pass through it every second.The transit time is about 1.25 nanoseconds for light to travel from one side to the other.So, at any one time, there must be about 7E15 photons in it.And yet, you say there can only be 3Can you explain the disparity?
Inside a 1D tube, which is 100cm long, you can succesfully trap as much as 1 photon of 100cm wavelenght and/or 2 photons at 100//2cm wavelenght + 3 photons at 100/3cm wavelenght + 4 photons at 100/4cm wavelenght and so on.
And yet you can't cut through steel with radiation below microwave wavelenghts. Please, show me just A SINGLE source, where someone with authentic certificate of proper education/knowledge/authority (it can be a diploma, a title or even a list of published scientific papers) in the field of QED, quantum optics/photonics or just in quantum physics in general, who is claiming otherwise...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTIWcK14tQE
And regarding the potato in a microwave - do the same with a granite rock or somehing made of glass, porcelain, or even of some syntetic plastic material. I'll send you 100$,
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 16/10/2021 01:13:06And regarding the potato in a microwave - do the same with a granite rock or somehing made of glass, porcelain, or even of some syntetic plastic material. I'll send you 100$,//www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwEQZw3KPWgsend the $100 to a charity of your choice.