1
New Theories / An Alternative Theory of Vacuum and Matter
« on: 08/02/2014 19:28:22 »
Einstein's Theory of Relativity and Quantum Theory both fail to explain physical phenomena outside of their own scale. The same applies to the Wave and Corpuscular theories of light. It is easy to see a common pattern – what works on a large scale fails on a small scale and vice versa. Therefore it is possible that these theories are not taking into account a common component which changes its physical properties depending on the scale. All above conventional theories substitute this common component with a few abstract concepts such as Time, Charge, and Field. Let’s take a closer look at each one of them.
Time is not a material thing. It’s just an abstract concept convenient for dealing with moving objects or running processes. Thus we always use a time gauge of some sort to determine other object positions in its motion or state of a running process. It’s easy to see that any time gauge we can possibly chose may change its readings depending on the environment. Does it mean that time is effected by the environment? What if different gauges change their time reading in a different way going from one environment to another? What is the right gauge in this case? If time is an illusion, does it mean that the concept of the space-time is a model based on illusion?
Historically charge was viewed as an ability of a particle to attract or repel other particles. Later mathematical quantum models added more complications to the concept of charge. We could ask ourselves the following questions. Do particles get attracted and repelled or just attracted? Can the repelling effect between two given particles be created by these particles being attracted by other particles in a shared volume? Is it possible that two particles carrying charge effect one another by mean of a third light body (the common component mentioned above) surrounding them?
Field is a way to represent force of the charge in a given volume. It’s reasonable to ask if the field is material thing. May be it is just a convenient way to mathematically describe the state of the light body carrying influence of the charged particle in the volume? Thus the light body can be stationary stretched, compressed, or be in motion relatively to the volume. All these states of the light body could be described with a concept of Field.
If Time, Charge, and Field are not material, than may be what we missing is the light body which can server as a common component? This common component was known in the past as aether. Now scientists call it dark matter. I can assume that a reader of this text might say “Hey, what about the Michelson–Morley experiment?” Please note that the above experiment had not confirmed relative motion of matter through the stationary aether but it haven’t disapproved existence of the aethrt itself.
Please read attached pdf. The theory brings back the concept of aether in a new prospective. Aether is a basic substance which serves as a building material for all other types of matter. The theory also suggests unity in the nature of forces (including gravity), proposes an alternative look at dynamics of space and astronomical bodies, and considers aether and free electrons as factors influencing the weather. It provides answers to some unsolved problems in today’s physics by taking an alternative look at what we know about the vacuum and matter.
Time is not a material thing. It’s just an abstract concept convenient for dealing with moving objects or running processes. Thus we always use a time gauge of some sort to determine other object positions in its motion or state of a running process. It’s easy to see that any time gauge we can possibly chose may change its readings depending on the environment. Does it mean that time is effected by the environment? What if different gauges change their time reading in a different way going from one environment to another? What is the right gauge in this case? If time is an illusion, does it mean that the concept of the space-time is a model based on illusion?
Historically charge was viewed as an ability of a particle to attract or repel other particles. Later mathematical quantum models added more complications to the concept of charge. We could ask ourselves the following questions. Do particles get attracted and repelled or just attracted? Can the repelling effect between two given particles be created by these particles being attracted by other particles in a shared volume? Is it possible that two particles carrying charge effect one another by mean of a third light body (the common component mentioned above) surrounding them?
Field is a way to represent force of the charge in a given volume. It’s reasonable to ask if the field is material thing. May be it is just a convenient way to mathematically describe the state of the light body carrying influence of the charged particle in the volume? Thus the light body can be stationary stretched, compressed, or be in motion relatively to the volume. All these states of the light body could be described with a concept of Field.
If Time, Charge, and Field are not material, than may be what we missing is the light body which can server as a common component? This common component was known in the past as aether. Now scientists call it dark matter. I can assume that a reader of this text might say “Hey, what about the Michelson–Morley experiment?” Please note that the above experiment had not confirmed relative motion of matter through the stationary aether but it haven’t disapproved existence of the aethrt itself.
Please read attached pdf. The theory brings back the concept of aether in a new prospective. Aether is a basic substance which serves as a building material for all other types of matter. The theory also suggests unity in the nature of forces (including gravity), proposes an alternative look at dynamics of space and astronomical bodies, and considers aether and free electrons as factors influencing the weather. It provides answers to some unsolved problems in today’s physics by taking an alternative look at what we know about the vacuum and matter.