0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So asking a question in regards to my patent which I'm about to let expire, it was granted in Canada. Anyhoo the idea was if you recall to bury a cannon 500 feet deep, shoot the balls up to the surface into a loop on the ground, take them out and lower them in an elevator. The cons of the system are converting hydrogen fuel, elevator's currently are 60 70% efficient, the pros are for the enviroment. 50% of the energy of an explosion iss converted into blast energy which is further divided into seismic, sound, and weight displacement. None of that hurts the atmosphere. The other 50% is heat that mostle stays deep in the ground. Some hotshot mentioned that the heat would eventually make its way to the surface and into the atmosphere. So my question is how well known is it that vibrations of the atom is what causes heat? Is it just an effect of heat passing through a substance? Wouldn't some of the energy from the canon to the surface be lost, if not all of it, through mechanical vibrations of the atoms?
50% of the energy of an explosion iss converted into blast energy which is further divided into seismic, sound, and weight displacement. None of that hurts the atmosphere.
What do you mean by this?Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 03/06/2023 20:45:1850% of the energy of an explosion iss converted into blast energy which is further divided into seismic, sound, and weight displacement. None of that hurts the atmosphere.
If I recall correctly, you were talking about using fusion to do this. A fusion powerplant isn't going to be hurting the atmosphere anyway.
its explanation is easy enough.
What are YOU asking me?
What is the point of your 'patent'?
I totally forgot about lasers.
Quote from: Kryptid on 04/06/2023 19:34:33If I recall correctly, you were talking about using fusion to do this. A fusion powerplant isn't going to be hurting the atmosphere anyway.Ah yes! I totally forgot about lasers.
It's my opinion that it doesn't matter so much the greenhouse gasses that are causing a warm up, but rather the way we burn fuels, pouring a could amount of heat straight into the air.
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 05/06/2023 01:44:13It's my opinion that it doesn't matter so much the greenhouse gasses that are causing a warm up, but rather the way we burn fuels, pouring a could amount of heat straight into the air. Do you have some math to support that?
I guess I'm ahead of evrybody 'gain tho.
If you don't have evidence to support it, that would just make it a hypothesis, not a theory.Also, what would you do with the water in the smoke stacks once it absorbed the heat? Remember, heat can't be destroyed.
Quote from: Kryptid on 05/06/2023 08:02:06If you don't have evidence to support it, that would just make it a hypothesis, not a theory.Also, what would you do with the water in the smoke stacks once it absorbed the heat? Remember, heat can't be destroyed.This is why I asked if oscillations of the atom's in the hot water release energy. I guess the question is when you pour boiling water on the ground does 100% of the heat re-enter the atmosphere? or does it dissipate downwards? into the denser cooler earth?
Do you understand that the deep earth is very hot?You can't expect heat to soak into it because heat is always coming up from it.That's why geothermal energy is a thing.