61
New Theories / Re: Hijack: Conserved zero point energy idea
« on: 08/12/2022 15:32:45 »The BB magically manifests a high temperature , dense state , would be my main objection .
I don't see how that's magical.
The first principle of evidence should always be in determining if the evidence is relative to the subject or the evidence has another meaning(s) . One should never automatically assume that the alledged evidence proves something to be true because evidence can be viewed in different contexts by the observer. It is important we are clear in our minds what the evidence is relative to, or this can lead to false facts entering the education system .
Reliable first principle information and reliable evidence is imperative for building a factual underlying basis of any subject. Without this first principle, any subject is open to ridicule and expression of disapproval .The reliability of proceding information that is derived from principle information , can be considered in being only as reliable as the principle information . If strict disciplines of how we view principle information is not adhered too , then again proceding information may not be factual information .
I can't make sense of this. Evidence isn't a relative thing.
There is multiple reasoning that the early universe started off in a low temperature , low density , sparse state .
That doesn't mesh with the evidence.
Space-time is a math model
Space-time is an actual thing.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter