0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Kryptid on 24/09/2017 15:14:32Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 15:10:10Your track lines do not show anti-proton in any sense, it shows something which we could subjectively make up something about the something. That does not make it so.......I can show you a particle of rice, I can show you a particle of a box of smarties. You can not really show me quantum particles in such a way. If you could show me all the particles in the box of ''smarties'', of course I would accept it to be the truth. However I do not even think particles exist because in reality they do not need to exist to create ''objects'' of solidity. Atoms in my eyes are 2 combined energies that give the energies physicality. I propose the proton field and the electron field become 1 to form solidity, the particle in a sense of substance not existing. So you do believe in a conspiracy by the scientific community to fabricate the existence of particles then?No I do not think there is any sort of conspiracy going on, I just think that sometimes information can be misinterpreted. Objectively in the experiment Bored Chemist provided of the anti-proton, we could not say with a 100% truth value that we are actually observing anti-protons. There is a magnetic field involved for one and it could be field fluctuations of the magnetic field. However I would not be 100% of that either. What I was saying is that particles are just energies/fields that seem to be objects. I.e the proton does not emit a field it is the field..added- Because if a negative and positive field merges, the new field has solidity against other fields. p.s Das fabric of space is der merging of der fields.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 15:10:10Your track lines do not show anti-proton in any sense, it shows something which we could subjectively make up something about the something. That does not make it so.......I can show you a particle of rice, I can show you a particle of a box of smarties. You can not really show me quantum particles in such a way. If you could show me all the particles in the box of ''smarties'', of course I would accept it to be the truth. However I do not even think particles exist because in reality they do not need to exist to create ''objects'' of solidity. Atoms in my eyes are 2 combined energies that give the energies physicality. I propose the proton field and the electron field become 1 to form solidity, the particle in a sense of substance not existing. So you do believe in a conspiracy by the scientific community to fabricate the existence of particles then?
Your track lines do not show anti-proton in any sense, it shows something which we could subjectively make up something about the something. That does not make it so.......I can show you a particle of rice, I can show you a particle of a box of smarties. You can not really show me quantum particles in such a way. If you could show me all the particles in the box of ''smarties'', of course I would accept it to be the truth. However I do not even think particles exist because in reality they do not need to exist to create ''objects'' of solidity. Atoms in my eyes are 2 combined energies that give the energies physicality. I propose the proton field and the electron field become 1 to form solidity, the particle in a sense of substance not existing.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 22:30:59Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/09/2017 22:27:08Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 22:04:30 I have observed atoms.How?By using a phone camera and a shiny black shoe , catching the glare off the sun.Sometimes the obvious troll is obvious.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/09/2017 22:27:08Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 22:04:30 I have observed atoms.How?By using a phone camera and a shiny black shoe , catching the glare off the sun.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/09/2017 22:04:30 I have observed atoms.How?
I have observed atoms.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/09/2017 13:43:53Yes I know they are too small to see by the eye.Then you know that what you saw could not have been atoms.QuoteIt was a while back I did it and I did have a video of it somewhere if I have not deleted it . I used angles of the camera and light to observe atoms. Well I am almost sure they were atoms because they looked like atoms and there was no other explanation to what they were. I will try to find the video to see what you think of the result and you can reach you own conclusion. If I can't find the video I will wait till a sunny day and repeat the experiment. What you saw could not have possibly been atoms because those are far too small to see with a camera. Cameras cannot magnify things anywhere near enough to see atoms. I suspect that what you saw was an optical phenomenon like lens flare. Barring that, how do you know what you were seeing had electrons and protons in it? You don't. Not just by looking at it.
Yes I know they are too small to see by the eye.
It was a while back I did it and I did have a video of it somewhere if I have not deleted it . I used angles of the camera and light to observe atoms. Well I am almost sure they were atoms because they looked like atoms and there was no other explanation to what they were. I will try to find the video to see what you think of the result and you can reach you own conclusion. If I can't find the video I will wait till a sunny day and repeat the experiment.
Of course you are correct in some respect.