0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
added thought - two opposite polarity ''energies'' can occupy the same point simultaneously.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 17:27:22added thought - two opposite polarity ''energies'' can occupy the same point simultaneously. What do you think that sentence means?
What do you think "zero point energy" means?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/11/2017 20:18:39What do you think "zero point energy" means?It means geometrical points of space that have 0 dimension where it is hard to imagine something from nothing manifesting. It is the point of ''creation'' which in an infinite universe is the relative centre of each observers universe. However I do not agree that a 0 point energy is lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. E would be at it's densest at 0 point in accordance with the transverse square law and the sphericalisation process.
So, nothing to do with what everyone else means by zero point energy.
Zero-point energy (ZPE) or ground state energy is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. ... Physics currently lacks a full theoretical model for understanding zero-point energy, in particular the discrepancy between theorized and observed vacuum energy is a source of major contention.
Quote from: Kryptid on 11/11/2017 16:36:56That doesn't happen in real life so your premise is already flawed. The field around a magnet stays the same size. It doesn't expand.The field around a magnet is not and cannot be a single pole according to the contradiction of your own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_lawQuoteThe law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.This here says my first premise has call for questioning.You and I both know likewise polarities mean expansion. If all points of a field were likewise in polarity, the field will expand according to physical laws. If it doe snot expand then it is not a single pole field.
That doesn't happen in real life so your premise is already flawed. The field around a magnet stays the same size. It doesn't expand.
The law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.
Guess what? I understand it and it is not the lowest measure.
Energy is at its densest at the central point of sphericalisation. Following the inverse square law , the wave energy weakens over a distance . The strong force is always central where the weakened force is dynamic and drops off over a distance to where 0 applies. E= where S is equal to 0³ of space.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 16:42:50Quote from: Kryptid on 11/11/2017 16:36:56That doesn't happen in real life so your premise is already flawed. The field around a magnet stays the same size. It doesn't expand.The field around a magnet is not and cannot be a single pole according to the contradiction of your own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_lawQuoteThe law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.This here says my first premise has call for questioning.You and I both know likewise polarities mean expansion. If all points of a field were likewise in polarity, the field will expand according to physical laws. If it doe snot expand then it is not a single pole field. Coulomb's law describes what happens between electrically-charged objects. The existing model posits that electromagnetic fields are made up of virtual photons. Photons do not have any electric charge. Coulomb's law therefore does not apply to them. The "contradiction" is all in your head.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 21:28:47Energy is at its densest at the central point of sphericalisation. Following the inverse square law , the wave energy weakens over a distance . The strong force is always central where the weakened force is dynamic and drops off over a distance to where 0 applies. E= where S is equal to 0³ of space.Word salad.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/11/2017 21:44:22Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 21:28:47Energy is at its densest at the central point of sphericalisation. Following the inverse square law , the wave energy weakens over a distance . The strong force is always central where the weakened force is dynamic and drops off over a distance to where 0 applies. E= where S is equal to 0³ of space.Word salad.Because you say so, it is only word salad if you do not understand it. I expect about only the top 5% in the world would understand it.
Electromagnetic fields have polarity and are not made up of photons.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 22:05:42Electromagnetic fields have polarity and are not made up of photons.Yes they are.Anyone with a decent understanding of physics would know that. You don't.You don't understand physics.
Do you understand the phrase "delusions of grandeur"?
I notice you can't attack the physics involved in the N-field and Q.F.S
Are you denying that magnets have poles?
There isn't any physics to attack.