1
New Theories / The antimatter mystery
« on: 01/08/2013 10:02:44 »
There is been a great mystery about our universe, brought about by perhaps the answer to a very similar mystery. The Big Bang is considered to quite possibly be the answer to the great question: How did the universe start? If it is indeed correct though, it brings to the surface an equally huge question. Scientists believe that when the Big Bang happened, equal amounts of matter and anti matter were created. However, when the two come into contact with each other, a huge explosion happens, and the particles 'vanish'. If this is the case, then how come the universe didn't just blow up the moment it was created?
U= (am)C²
1,000,000,000
U is simply Universe. a is antimatter. m stands for matter. C² is the speed of light from Einstein's great formula proving the equality of mass and energy. The theory is that when the explosion happened, since you can't destroy mass or energy, the mass would convert to energy. Since everything was so new, the energy was unstable and a very tiny amount tried to convert back into matter and antimatter, but only managed to convert to matter. This process repeated until there was just matter and energy. Over time, due to the remaining matter, this energy would convert itself into matter. If it had attempted to convert to antimatter, then the whole process would repeat again. This is my theory.
It seems unlikely that an unknown person could provide an answer to a question that many great scientists have failed, but even if this was correct, then it would not answer everything to do with antimatter.
Solar flares release tiny antimatter particles, and there is an enormous plume of antimatter coming from the center of our galaxy. I may have the answer to this as well. Whereas my other theory works on the basis on antimatter and matter convert into a combined energy, this one requires a third theory.
Imagine if at places of great, but jumbled gravity, antimatter converted into a seperate energy to matter. When the energy converts back, it has to simply all go to antimatter since that is all it has ever 'known'.
This are simply the ideas of someone who has studied antimatter and other cosmic mysteries recently. If there's no way it could possibly be right, just say so. But also if it has a possibility, please let me know
U= (am)C²
1,000,000,000
U is simply Universe. a is antimatter. m stands for matter. C² is the speed of light from Einstein's great formula proving the equality of mass and energy. The theory is that when the explosion happened, since you can't destroy mass or energy, the mass would convert to energy. Since everything was so new, the energy was unstable and a very tiny amount tried to convert back into matter and antimatter, but only managed to convert to matter. This process repeated until there was just matter and energy. Over time, due to the remaining matter, this energy would convert itself into matter. If it had attempted to convert to antimatter, then the whole process would repeat again. This is my theory.
It seems unlikely that an unknown person could provide an answer to a question that many great scientists have failed, but even if this was correct, then it would not answer everything to do with antimatter.
Solar flares release tiny antimatter particles, and there is an enormous plume of antimatter coming from the center of our galaxy. I may have the answer to this as well. Whereas my other theory works on the basis on antimatter and matter convert into a combined energy, this one requires a third theory.
Imagine if at places of great, but jumbled gravity, antimatter converted into a seperate energy to matter. When the energy converts back, it has to simply all go to antimatter since that is all it has ever 'known'.
This are simply the ideas of someone who has studied antimatter and other cosmic mysteries recently. If there's no way it could possibly be right, just say so. But also if it has a possibility, please let me know