0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The point of this expostion is... if it is true that POIS is harmful to all of us, and if POIS has at least five stages, then perhaps stopping the illness at an earlier stage would be easier, more effective and could alleviate some of our very real suffering....Just a thought
Post Orgasmic Illness Syndrome. The name has a chilling feel to it, like walking down a waxed linoleum floored, olive drably-painted hospital hallway...Upon orgasm, not even one third the way through it, my brain structure begins a catastrophic collapse...then how can I say it's simply orgasm that causes this....
LEVITRAAt one time, this represented a 75% cure for me, cause for much joyful celebration and glee.Some of us thought that perhaps the major impact on POIS is due to Levitra's effect in stimulating nitric oxide?It's now over a year later since first discovering Levitra's effect on POIS accidentally, and I'm not so sure how well it's still working.Perhaps the cognitive symptoms have lessened. But the exhaustion is still there, and it's debilitating, even though the symptomatic length of time has been cut down.
Why keep the POIS name, even for now?One compelling reason: many, many sufferers have found us here at The POIS Forum, by Googling keywords from Dr. Waldinger's POIS paper - which garnered significant worldwide publicity: not just the regular posters here, but also the people representing the nearly 200,000 page views of this forum.
Quote from: demografx on 13/01/2009 18:02:49Why keep the POIS name, even for now?I absolutely agree. Changing the name from "POIS" would be an incredible setback; This is a serious problem, and it's not something I want to have, or want to embrace in any way. I just want to learn about it, have it taken seriously, or preferably, free myself of it completely.
Why keep the POIS name, even for now?I absolutely agree. Changing the name from "POIS" would be an incredible setback; This is a serious problem, and it's not something I want to have, or want to embrace in any way. I just want to learn about it, have it taken seriously, or preferably, free myself of it completely.
With respect to minor differences that may crop up from time to time on this forum, I'd like to comment. First of all, this is a fabulous forum, the best I've ever seen, with the best participants. POIS is probably the most delicate issue that could ever be discussed. And I submit, that delicate is the correct word when it comes to both subject matter and the mode of communication. With respect to the widely accepted term POIS, everybody is correct. I don't see a controvery or even differences.Let me explain: All would probably agree that disorder can be a component of inquiry that may ultimately find its value through digression, reformulation and spontaneous ejaculation (please note the 2nd denotation in Websters). Merleau-Ponty observes,"...everyhing is linked by references to a center of interest...which no guidelines mark out in advance." On the other hand, as Vygotsky notes, "...words and other signs are those means that direct our mental operations...and channel them toward the solution of the problem confronting us." Thus, all the recent viewpoints are dialogically proper with respect to POIS, whether there be a spontaneous, prosaic observation or a response to it. All are constructive in their entirety. All seek to add to the discussion of POIS. Whether one describes their response to the term POIS with words like inadequacy or dishonest, and another asserts that such a response is frivolous ispart of a constructive discourse. As a philosopher and lawyer, I see no basis for the existence of opposition here. POIS is POIS and serves as a universally accepted term for this forum. It is its identity. However, if a post begins with a vivid, literary introduction that is clearly spontaneous, and ends with a thesis statement that supports the body of the post and urges us to consider POIS as an illness of stages and uses the term POIS twice, then I submit there is no basis of disagreement. This is part of a constructive, multi-perspective dialogue.
urges us to consider POIS as an illness of stages and uses the term POIS twice, then I submit there is no basis of disagreement.
Counterpoints,As an aside, can you list the 10 mental symptoms you have found in your sample of 60% of the respondents?
ALPHA 20 C: I've been away for a while. I know it is VERY EXPENSIVE, that's why I've stopped taking it.
I got sunrider product alpha 20c what a reap of but i need to find out whether it works or not. the ingredients according to box are; nandina flower(chinese white flower), paris polyphylia(paris herb)root, scutellaria baicalensis (scutellaria herb)root; dandelion root; imperata root
Quote from: SteveD on 13/01/2009 21:55:54Counterpoints,As an aside, can you list the 10 mental symptoms you have found in your sample of 60% of the respondents?Hi Steve,Sure. As I said earlier, these are "very approximate" figures. I made a post about this earlier, where I listed group 1, 2, 3 symptoms. It's based on what I've seen in this thread, what has been sent to me through private message, what I've seen in the questionnaire responses, what I've read in papers, etc. I don't have time to find the post right now, but I can repost it. It was a list I made when I was about to consult with a neurologist researcher. At the time, I welcomed additions and comments, and I still do.