1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
New Theories / Re: Do We have 1 kg Master in Paris ?
« on: 22/11/2015 16:48:33 »
HOW BIG FORCE IS PUSHING SATELLITE
HOW FAST IS EM PREASURE ?
CAN WE USE DYNAMICA TO EVALUATE MOTION ?
HOW FAST IS EM PREASURE ?
CAN WE USE DYNAMICA TO EVALUATE MOTION ?
3
New Theories / Re: Do We have 1 kg Master in Paris ?
« on: 22/11/2015 16:44:29 »HOW HEAVY IS ELECTRON
V^2 it is strong variable !!!
DOUBLE SLITS
How EM preasure is pushing ELECTRON ?
4
New Theories / Re: Do We have 1 kg Master in Paris ?
« on: 22/11/2015 16:40:24 »When Eistein took Atomic clock to Airplane What he did for physics ?
In my opinion he joust change radius !!!
5
New Theories / Re: Do We have 1 kg Master in Paris ?
« on: 22/11/2015 16:38:22 »
EXIST STATICA and DYNAMICA !!!
for Car 80 km/h it is not aerodynamic problem
but the same car and 160 km/h = AERODYNAMICA
PLEASE STUDY A-A AREA
HOW HEAVY IS 1 kg
BODY's SHAPE PLANET'S SHAPE
for Car 80 km/h it is not aerodynamic problem
but the same car and 160 km/h = AERODYNAMICA
PLEASE STUDY A-A AREA
HOW HEAVY IS 1 kg
BODY's SHAPE PLANET'S SHAPE
6
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 11:10:01 »
HOW BIG PREASURE IS PUSHING CAMERA
bulb ----- camear >>> 30 km/s
camera-----bulb >>> 30 km/s
MY NIKON = 190 000 points
(NIKON 5000d remote start, zero outside light ,stative, manual set ,
time 10s , F 8 , Iso 200 - /10 cm to bulb / filtre is important !!!)
MY FIRST pictures ( camera -----bulb >>> motion and bulb-----camera >>> motion )
bulb ----- camear >>> 30 km/s
camera-----bulb >>> 30 km/s
MY NIKON = 190 000 points
(NIKON 5000d remote start, zero outside light ,stative, manual set ,
time 10s , F 8 , Iso 200 - /10 cm to bulb / filtre is important !!!)
MY FIRST pictures ( camera -----bulb >>> motion and bulb-----camera >>> motion )
7
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 11:05:21 »
CAN WE COMPARE
ELECTRO MAGNETIC PREASURE to AIR'S PREASURE
HOW BIG FORCE IS PUSHING AIR INSIDE BOX ?
HOW MANY ENERGY WILL LOST SIGNAL ?
ENERGY ALWAYS ESCAPE THERE WHERE FEEL LOWER RESISTANCE !!!
ELECTRO MAGNETIC PREASURE to AIR'S PREASURE
HOW BIG FORCE IS PUSHING AIR INSIDE BOX ?
HOW MANY ENERGY WILL LOST SIGNAL ?
ENERGY ALWAYS ESCAPE THERE WHERE FEEL LOWER RESISTANCE !!!
8
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 11:01:14 »
ATOM and MOTION
9
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:58:35 »
I'M INSIDE ROCKET ( ZERO WINDOS )
I TURNED ON BULB ( I feel that rocket is slowing down )
I TURNED ON BULB ( I feel that rocket is slowing down )
10
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:54:59 »11
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:54:08 »12
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:53:02 »
HOW FAST IS ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PREASURE
13
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:51:28 »
THEORY :
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE = [ Joul / cubic meters = Newton *meter / cubic meters = N/m^2 ]
I DON't KNOW BUT EXPERIMENT WITH LIGHT = TYPICAL CLASSIC MECHNICA !!
FORCE ( EM preasure ) has got point where started in Empty space !!!
IS this point stationary ?
HOW BIG PRESURE IS REGISTERING SAIL
CONSTANT ? or NOT
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE = [ Joul / cubic meters = Newton *meter / cubic meters = N/m^2 ]
I DON't KNOW BUT EXPERIMENT WITH LIGHT = TYPICAL CLASSIC MECHNICA !!
FORCE ( EM preasure ) has got point where started in Empty space !!!
IS this point stationary ?
HOW BIG PRESURE IS REGISTERING SAIL
CONSTANT ? or NOT
14
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:48:33 »
Galilean relativity - fundament for modern physics
source : http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node47.html
******************************************************************
Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.
Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:
any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity.
************************************************************************************
source : http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node47.html
******************************************************************
Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.
Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:
any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity.
************************************************************************************
15
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:47:03 »PHYSICS LOVE ANALOGY
CAN I COPY ABOVE IDEA TO START EVALUATE CONSTANT LINE MOTION ?
TORQUE and ARM
16
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:45:31 »
Exist also "medium problem"
Energy is pushing objects ( Maxwell 1861 )
Air inside box = object
Air is giving resistance to 3D signal
HOW MANY JOULES WILL LOST SIGNAL TO PUSH AIR ?
PUSHING and DIRECTION is imprtant ?
AIR IS " DANCING " TORQUE problem
Energy is pushing objects ( Maxwell 1861 )
Air inside box = object
Air is giving resistance to 3D signal
HOW MANY JOULES WILL LOST SIGNAL TO PUSH AIR ?
PUSHING and DIRECTION is imprtant ?
AIR IS " DANCING " TORQUE problem
17
New Theories / Re: How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:41:41 »Someone in Cabridge want to repeat above test ? or I making mistake
18
New Theories / How big force is pushing the Earth ? (I have problem Cosinus reduction )
« on: 22/11/2015 10:36:27 »
THEORY :
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE = [ Joul / cubic meters = Newton *meter / cubic meters = N/m^2 ]
I HAVE BIG QUESTION
ABOUT cosine reduction Why we are making INVERSE SQUARE graph respect to SUN's "FRESH" position ?
NEXT QUESTION IS ABOUT GRAVITATION
F1=F2 I think that we should make Inerse Square Graph respect to point where big mass M started 3d signal ??
HOW TO START INTERNATIONA RESEAR ?
HOW TO BUILD TEAM ?
HOW TO GET MONEY FOR TESTS ?
ABOVE YOU SEE NEW THEORY or FACTS
thank You
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE = [ Joul / cubic meters = Newton *meter / cubic meters = N/m^2 ]
I HAVE BIG QUESTION
ABOUT cosine reduction Why we are making INVERSE SQUARE graph respect to SUN's "FRESH" position ?
NEXT QUESTION IS ABOUT GRAVITATION
F1=F2 I think that we should make Inerse Square Graph respect to point where big mass M started 3d signal ??
HOW TO START INTERNATIONA RESEAR ?
HOW TO BUILD TEAM ?
HOW TO GET MONEY FOR TESTS ?
ABOVE YOU SEE NEW THEORY or FACTS
thank You
19
New Theories / Do We have 1 kg Master in Paris ?
« on: 22/11/2015 09:25:23 »In physics exist
NORMAL TEMPERATURE
NORMAL AIR's prasure
DO WE NEED NORMAL EM RADIATION ?
HOW HEAVY IS 1 kg ?
THEORY :
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE = [ Joul / cubic meters = Newton *meter / cubic meters = N/m^2 ]
0,001 mm sheet has got near 100 m^2 area !!!
I Maciej Marosz my own opinion ( I don't know )
but Each material need separate master
20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: AM I ABLE MEASURE EARTH's MOTION
« on: 21/11/2015 17:18:58 »MICHELSON - MORLEY
(DYNAMICA EDITION 2012 Poland)
How big force is registering left /right wall ( intensity ? )
1 NOT EXIST C+V !
2 where 3D signal started?
3 where are walls ?