0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I challenge the forum, to pick anything in physics I can't explain in a simple "why" language. (not a math contest, my physics major was enough). The only rules are to be respectful and pick something most people know about. People don't have answers for even basic things like, why do objects travel in straight lines and the constancy of the speed of light. I'll answer the first 4 people who ask questions. Let me show you what, "if you can't explain it to your grandmother you don't understand it really means." In my eyes, my "new theories" are Einstein in most of yours their new theories.
You can answer them here, or alternatively, post your answers in my thread.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=80604.0
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 17/03/2022 09:47:55You can answer them here, or alternatively, post your answers in my thread.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=80604.0Seriously? You hijack the thread and then try to direct readers to your own thread. Very rude, reported.
I challenge the forum, to pick anything in physics I can't explain in a simple "why" language. (not a math contest, my physics major was enough). The only rules are to be respectful and pick something most people know about.
Video #4 : Non-diffractive Obstacle. It shows a case where the edge of an obstacle can block a light beam without producing diffraction pattern. Here the interface between the glass and the air acts as total internal reflector which prevent the light from reaching the area behind the reflector.
Video #13: Non-diffractive slit. Here we put Huygen’s principle as currently accepted explanation for single slit diffraction to the test. To determine whether the space or the edges of the slit as the real interfering point sources, we can conduct an experiment using a slit whose edges are not diffractive. If Huygen’s principle is correct, then we should still get interference pattern even though the edges of the slit doesn’t diffract light.
The rest of the video can be watched here
Come on man. Semantics much? I have always heard DNA was a crystal, but even if it wasn't like you say, the whole premise is that repetitive structures play a role in fields which it obviously has regardless of whether you want to call it a crystal or not.
Why are you quoting the original isolation of DNA when the premise is about its shape?
Lastly, why are you quoting the angle of electrons from one another in a single water molecule? 104.5. Completely irrelevant. Once it is formed into ice, which is what I was talking about it forms sharp 60 degree angles.
In ice, oxygen is tetrahedrally surrounded by four hydrogen atoms with a bond angle 109∘28′
First off the bat. Here's a simple yet far reaching idea. I figured this out in middle school. You can tell whether something is exothermic or endothermic with one simple idea. Does it involve something moving closer together? Or does it involve something moving further away? Any experiment where masses move together is exothermic, and any experiment where masses move apart is endothermic.
why nuclear is so powerful as it's changing distances on the scale of the nucleus which mathematically should be much greater than changing larger distances like in the case of chemical bonds.
Also like I said, I'm only going to use three ideas and I'm going to make it appear like I created a brand new theory with them. Fields, Relativity and my Universal Principle.
Ideal gas law. Condense the gas, create heat. Spread it out reduce heat.
Condensation as water condenses on you is exothermic.
I most certainly did literally ask for it. Challenge Accepted. I was starting to think you guys are just chickens.
In chemistry if two molecules bond, its always exothermic and if they break apart its always endothermic. 0 exceptions to this rule which is pretty rare for chemistry.
What may appear to be an obvious exception to the rule could be nuclear fission.
Perhaps when two particles move closer together they "bleed out" their mass/energy/field. There is your new theory of what heat is, it's smaller bits of field that have no home.
When things move closer it bleeds out the field, and when they move further away it sucks up more field.
Quote from: thebrain13 on 18/03/2022 00:08:53Condensation as water condenses on you is exothermic. Not necessarily.