0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Unevinced means something new,
I can show with a simple experiment that the idea of my drive works in principle.
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:19:27Unevinced means something new, No it doesn't.Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:19:27I can show with a simple experiment that the idea of my drive works in principle. Then do so.Please note that cartoons are not experiments, nor are they evidence.
I could devise a real experiment to show the physics of my idea work to gain a warp speed by using the N-field drive. Whether we are intelligent enough to build such a craft is hard to say. In principle it should not be that difficult with the right staff.
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:28:35I could devise a real experiment to show the physics of my idea work to gain a warp speed by using the N-field drive. Whether we are intelligent enough to build such a craft is hard to say. In principle it should not be that difficult with the right staff. Do you think anyone believes you?
If your N-field drive didn't work, would you count that as a falsification of the N-field?
most people don't even understand about fields etc.
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:55:32 most people don't even understand about fields etc. That group includes 1 more than you think it does.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/04/2018 19:11:50Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:55:32 most people don't even understand about fields etc. That group includes 1 more than you think it does.I always thought you knew about fields , I could teach you if you like?
Quote from: Thebox on 30/04/2018 19:21:06Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/04/2018 19:11:50Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 22:55:32 most people don't even understand about fields etc. That group includes 1 more than you think it does.I always thought you knew about fields , I could teach you if you like? Thus far you have failed to explain anything about your made -up N field.It seems unrealistic to think you know any more about other fields.
I am ''programmed'' to give you answers.
Quote from: Thebox on 30/04/2018 19:36:04 I am ''programmed'' to give you answers.That would explain why you sometimes seem like a chat bot.However, you don't give meaningful answers.Cut to the chase: what is an N field?
If a failure of your N-field drive would not count as a falsification of the N-field, then what kind of an experiment could falsify the N-field in your eyes?
I could perhaps try an experiment where I curve space time observably
Quote from: Thebox on 01/05/2018 05:27:17I could perhaps try an experiment where I curve space time observablyFailure to do that would then count as falsification? Remember, I'm talking about falsification specifically.
If my basic experiment failed , I think any version of the field would be in danger. But also if any of my parameters of my experiment are wrong, then that fails to show I am wrong and I will have to re-think the experiment.
Quote from: Thebox on 01/05/2018 05:35:11If my basic experiment failed , I think any version of the field would be in danger. But also if any of my parameters of my experiment are wrong, then that fails to show I am wrong and I will have to re-think the experiment. Then I think you'd best think of an experiment that could potentially falsify the idea completely. Otherwise it isn't scientific.