0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
matter consists infinitely of pieces of matter
… in chemical interactions it interacts infinitely ,
… electrons are an infinite flow of energy light as well is an infinite flow of energy.
matter consists infinitely of pieces of matter , in chemical interactions it interacts infinitely , electrons are an infinite flow of energy light as well is an infinite flow of energy.gravity is tendency to fulfill displacement in space caused by a mass M. the displacement in space is equivalent to the mass itself. space press mass and cause potential from positive(space existence) to neutral ( space displacement) force decreases by the increment in distance is because of the engineering of space , the same as pictures becomes smaller at far distances. if a have two masses m and M connected to each other by a bar and a third mass attracts them , then when they move farther from the third mass the force vectors should stretch from each other the decrease in the angle between the force vectors cause decrement in the force on the two masses m and M by the third mass , but the same could be applied on a mass m considering it consists of several massesmass is energy and magnetism is also energy , that is some kind of mass-contained energy- inside a magnet causing magnetic field, the attraction between two magnets is contained energy to contained energy.electrostatics is contained energy - electrons- to contained energy attraction.
matter consists infinitely of pieces of matter , in chemical interactions it interacts infinitely , electrons are an infinite flow of energy light as well is an infinite flow of energy.
This is confusing, but let me test my understanding, and you can comment as to whether I am anywhere near the intent:matter takes the form of particles, and particles have a very intense composition of tinier matter-like increments, each of which can be said to represent a hint of the total mass of the particle. There is a lot more to the story, I’m sure, but does this jive with what you're thinking?
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 03/06/2018 21:00:47This is confusing, but let me test my understanding, and you can comment as to whether I am anywhere near the intent:matter takes the form of particles, and particles have a very intense composition of tinier matter-like increments, each of which can be said to represent a hint of the total mass of the particle. There is a lot more to the story, I’m sure, but does this jive with what you're thinking?matter do not consist of any kind of particles it is not discrete but continuous, and I could rewrite science according to my understanding, but if matter consists of quarks , what are these quarks consists of? and what those particles consist of ? etc . Also what are electrons consists of ? if they are so fundamental , what is their material ? how it gains its mass according to mass-energy principle ?
matter do not consist of any kind of particles it is not discrete but continuous,
and I could rewrite science according to my understanding, but if matter consists of quarks , what are these quarks consists of? and what those particles consist of ? etc . Also what are electrons consists of ? if they are so fundamental , what is their material ?
how it gains its mass according to mass-energy principle ?
is it more logical that when I rub silk with plastic I convert kinetic energy into both heat energy and energy flow -electrons- than some electrons moved from material to material?I do not know who thought of this thinks what then happens chemically
what makes sodium that it has 11 protons and electrons a sodium ? is it because it has that number?
and carbon has less number ? then it is not sodium?
matter is infinite and has its characteristics infinitely compound consists of two elements infinitely , a compound to have its own completely different characteristics it should consist of two elements infinitely
water is also infinite but why it seems it has particles and gaps between them ?
because of density , I call it absolute density snow has greater density and water has less
if matter is compressed it becomes solid.why light goes through glass ?
this could be an example it is not because it goes through its particles' gaps but because glass has less density than other materials
and now let the glass thicker and thicker and thicker it won't be able to go through any more.
Quote from: Yahya on 04/06/2018 04:49:53matter do not consist of any kind of particles it is not discrete but continuous,We know for a fact that it is it made of particles. We've been able to demonstrate the existence of atoms and subatomic particles for over a century now.
but could you just give me an answer what do quarks consist of ? please do not just go and neglect my question.
You also did not answer my question about chemical reactions when rubbing silk and plastic ? I could explain things incompletely according to my theory but science which I know and you know should explain everything , right ? so what are the answers to my two questions? what do quarks consist of ? (not an exact answer but what could possibly ....... ) and what happens chemically when rubbing silk with plastic?
I already answered this. In accordance with existing evidence, they are not composed of anything simpler than themselves. According to superstring model (which hasn't been confirmed but does do a good job of modeling subatomic particles mathematically), quarks are tiny, one-dimensional strings that vibrate and rotate. In either case, quarks are not made of any kind of material. They just "are".
Static electricity is caused by a transfer of electrons from one substance to another, causing the material that lost electrons to become positively-charged and the material that gained them to become negatively-charged. On a molecular level, some of the atoms must become ionized in the process. However, the ultimate chemical structure of the materials are basically unchanged.
Quote from: Yahya on 04/06/2018 20:21:12but could you just give me an answer what do quarks consist of ? please do not just go and neglect my question.I already answered this. In accordance with existing evidence, they are not composed of anything simpler than themselves. According to superstring model (which hasn't been confirmed but does do a good job of modeling subatomic particles mathematically), quarks are tiny, one-dimensional strings that vibrate and rotate. In either case, quarks are not made of any kind of material. They just "are".QuoteYou also did not answer my question about chemical reactions when rubbing silk and plastic ? I could explain things incompletely according to my theory but science which I know and you know should explain everything , right ? so what are the answers to my two questions? what do quarks consist of ? (not an exact answer but what could possibly ....... ) and what happens chemically when rubbing silk with plastic?Static electricity is caused by a transfer of electrons from one substance to another, causing the material that lost electrons to become positively-charged and the material that gained them to become negatively-charged. On a molecular level, some of the atoms must become ionized in the process. However, the ultimate chemical structure of the materials are basically unchanged.
how they are themselves material but not made of any material ?
and what are these strings consists of ?even if the have one dimension , they have length and their length can be divided into infinite pieces that what I call infinite matter in contrary to what known that these pieces should be particles but you should notice that scientists always try to answer the question what it consists of? continuously giving the idea that it is endless.so could you answer my questions again.
you did not answer the question , I asked why? there should be any chemical change or reactions as outer orbit's electrons are crucial in chemistry, that a charged atom is in fact an ion.
it is widely known that quarks are point particles that can't take up space , could you explain this :In the part Titled "in physics" line 5 it reads" According to the Standard Model of particle physics, the particles that make up an atom—quarks and electrons—are point particles: they do not take up space"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_divisibilitybut here in section "fundamental properties" line 17 it reads " The issue of the radius of the electron is a challenging problem of the modern theoretical physics. The admission of the hypothesis of a finite radius of the electron is incompatible to the premises of the theory of relativity. On the other hand, a point-like electron (zero radius) generates serious mathematical difficulties due to the self-energy of the electron tending to infinity"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronlower at line 19 it reads " Observation of a single electron in a Penning trap suggests the upper limit of the particle's radius to be 10−22 meters.[78] The upper bound of the electron radius of 10−18 meters"could you explain these contradictions?
but it also reads In the part Titled "in physics" line 6 "What makes an atom nevertheless take up space is not any spatially extended "stuff" that "occupies space", and that might be cut into smaller and smaller pieces" which refer to the principle I am proposing here which is the possibility of infinite divisibility of matter
According to superstring model which hasn't been confirmed
but does do a good job of modeling subatomic particles mathematically
Superstrings aren't made of any material either
Why what? Why do the electrons move from one material to the other? Is that what you're asking?
because it is just craziness and has nothing to do with reality
because there is a real problem at the standard model
what are superstrings? how to prove its existence ? you said the theory is not confirmed yet , then there is not a proof , it is something unclear that does not have a proof of its existence but tries pathetically to solve the contradiction I pointed out above , right ? so what are these superstring and what is the proof of there existence ?
I do not need a proof because its just simple mathematics and simple concept what I should present is explanation to physical and chemical phenomena according to my understanding
what I asked is why shouldn't there be any chemical change ?losing and gaining electrons is crucial in chemistry they should become ions or any other chemical change.
Can you demonstrate this? How well do you understand superstring theory?
There is no proof of superstrings. I never said that there was. I only pointed out that the superstring model does a good job of explaining what we see in the physical world. That doesn't prove that it's correct, but it does show that it is worth further investigation.
superstring model does a good job of explaining what we see in the physical world
If you want to consider it a chemical change because electron transfer is involved, then fine. It's a very minor one, though.
I do not understand it I asked what superstrings are but yo did not answer , what are they ? I see them unclear concept.
So you are talking about superstrings which are unclear entities - I still need to know what theyare- in addition they may exist or not?
I can tell any theory that explain the contradictions but not verified in addition it is not just a theory they are entities, the theory being presented unclear is to escape from the clear idea of infinite divisibility .
I don't understand , do you imply that there might be any chemical change in the process? what is it ?