0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NoM + M = M and S + S = S
1 + 1 = 1
Where is the 0 ?
1+1= 1
Quote from: santiugarte on 03/04/2018 22:56:57attached is a pdf presentation proposing a hypothesis that tries to quantize gravity1+1=2 Couldn't be more simpler
attached is a pdf presentation proposing a hypothesis that tries to quantize gravity
I thought chemists suppose to know that two things merged/combined, become one.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 01:10:52I thought chemists suppose to know that two things merged/combined, become one. Chemists understand that when you combine two things you get something different, not the same thing.Mathematicians understand the same thing.In the case of raindrops, meteorologists understand that raindrops are formed from the combination of droplets that are too small to fall as rain because the up-draft in clouds keeps them airborne.The only one who doesn't understand this seems to be you.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/04/2018 10:15:331+1= 1 Yet you post in another thread:Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2018 11:05:28Quote from: santiugarte on 03/04/2018 22:56:57attached is a pdf presentation proposing a hypothesis that tries to quantize gravity1+1=2 Couldn't be more simpler To answer BC's question as to whether trolling or bad at maths , obvious trolling from the self confessed 'King of the Trolls'
Go away
I know more than science.
Congrats on getting me banned elsewhere, for about the 20th time.
You must be infatuated with me.
Two drops of water that join together in a cup become one, you are so silly at times.
And what do you think "S" is in your post?It's conventionally used to represent entropy.Entropy does not behave like raindrops.
I suggest you do not know as much as you pretend to know.
OK, entropy follows the normal rules for arithmetic. 1 + 1 = 2So you are wrong (as usual).Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 23:23:27 I suggest you do not know as much as you pretend to know. I suggest you get a mirror.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/04/2018 09:37:51OK, entropy follows the normal rules for arithmetic. 1 + 1 = 2So you are wrong (as usual).Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 23:23:27 I suggest you do not know as much as you pretend to know. I suggest you get a mirror.Your not considering that two drops of water have the same viscosity so have no problem merging to become one.
Quote from: Thebox on 16/04/2018 02:19:27Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/04/2018 09:37:51OK, entropy follows the normal rules for arithmetic. 1 + 1 = 2So you are wrong (as usual).Quote from: Thebox on 14/04/2018 23:23:27 I suggest you do not know as much as you pretend to know. I suggest you get a mirror.Your not considering that two drops of water have the same viscosity so have no problem merging to become one. I am ignoring a whole suite of measured properties and comparing entropy to the group in which it belongs.Density, for example, is an intensive property.A drop of water has the same density as 2 drops, or a bucketful.Viscosity, refractive index, dielectric constant and temperature ( as well as many others) do the same.However, entropy is an extensive property.This has been known about for a long time; the words intensive and extensive in this context were coined about a hundred years ago.So, as usual the problem is that I know science, but you don't.Do you enjoy looking foolish?If not, I suggest that you learn more and post less.
Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,
I am not doing all the work , that is not fair it is not my job, I do not get paid for my time.
Liar.Google can find no reference to the phrase.You have not told us about it.You are making stuff up
Nice try, I have give you enough, you does not mean you personally Mr C , you know that.
It is not my fault if you can't spot the pieces I have put in threads.
I am feeling quite proud of myself.
she is really smart.
She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
I tried to defend time dilation, she said no and counted fast then slow to prove me wrong.
my daughter who is only eleven, will be the new improved model of me.
It doesn't matter who googles " space-time cyclones".So it has nothing to do with me personally.