21
22
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:47:38 »How do you think it will turn out after this war, after reading those two?
23
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:46:28 »Well
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/16/activists-sue-russia-climate-policy-court
Let's see. How about that war economy, and how did it look before that war?
https://hir.harvard.edu/fossil-fuel-financing-and-the-russia-ukraine-war/
2021 https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20211115-climate-change-can-russia-leave-fossil-fuels-behind
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/16/activists-sue-russia-climate-policy-court
Let's see. How about that war economy, and how did it look before that war?
https://hir.harvard.edu/fossil-fuel-financing-and-the-russia-ukraine-war/
2021 https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20211115-climate-change-can-russia-leave-fossil-fuels-behind
24
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:34:37 »And we can't accept it. We still try to mold this Earth into something it never was. Our garden.
25
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:30:09 »Well, they adapt of course, and so do we. But with the way we used our intelligence we stepped over all boundaries for how Earth takes care of itself, and us. Manipulating Earth to fit our needs. We never needed one as long as we were inside those boundaries. And most of you still think we are.
We're not
We're not
26
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:26:48 »We don't have a precautionary principle. and the reason why is simple. This Earth was big enough, and diverse enough, to let us act this way. Animals doesn't have precautionary principles more than those imprinted in them.
27
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:20:54 »28
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:15:07 »Assuming that figure to be correct, 20%, or close to it. The only thing that can inform us will be statistics, coming after those extinctions taking its toll. Which means that it will be too late, and too slow.
29
New Theories / Re: What makes Riemann's Hypothesis Hard to Prove?
« Last post by hamdani yusuf on Today at 05:14:38 »When the imaginary part is around 6.3, the backslash function in the critical strip returns near zero for the real part.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+%28log%28%28zeta%28x%2B6.3i%29%29+%2F+%28Zeta%281-x%2B6.3i%29%29%29%29from+0+to+1
Let's ignore the imaginary part to get a closer look at the real part.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+re%28log%28%28zeta%28x%2B6.3i%29%29+%2F+%28Zeta%281-x%2B6.3i%29%29%29%29from+0+to+1
We get a nice full wave when the imaginary part is exactly 2*pi
The significance of points (0.2, -0.0002) and (0.8, 0.0002) is yet to be determined.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+%28log%28%28zeta%28x%2B6.3i%29%29+%2F+%28Zeta%281-x%2B6.3i%29%29%29%29from+0+to+1
Let's ignore the imaginary part to get a closer look at the real part.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+re%28log%28%28zeta%28x%2B6.3i%29%29+%2F+%28Zeta%281-x%2B6.3i%29%29%29%29from+0+to+1
We get a nice full wave when the imaginary part is exactly 2*pi
The significance of points (0.2, -0.0002) and (0.8, 0.0002) is yet to be determined.
30
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 05:11:41 »That's a question.
You want it?
You want it?