91
92
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Yesterday at 08:08:40 »So what is the point of it?
Well, it's the bed you make you have to lie down on.
Well, it's the bed you make you have to lie down on.
93
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: If Red Light cures everything, why aren't hospital lightbulbs red?
« Last post by set fair on Yesterday at 02:30:29 »This guy isn't a loony and neither is he selling red lights
https://www.youtube.com/@Medcram/videos
https://www.youtube.com/@Medcram/videos
94
New Theories / Re: How do we measure the energy of a photon?
« Last post by mxplxxx on 15/05/2024 23:54:43 »In 4dAbstractions everything is a system, and all systems are a type of 4dSystem. The central system of a 4dSystem is a 4dStar. Which means that a 4dStar array can occur in a 4dSystem to infinity with each 4dStar tending to be smaller than the previous.So, in 4dAbstractions, a simulation of a solar system utilises a series of concentric 4dStar systems, culminating in a central Sun.Star system. This may indicate that, in Reality, the shells of the solar system are types of protons (and that, just maybe, the Solar System itself is a type of atom).
i.e. A 4dSystem is temporal in nature and a 4dStar is infinite in nature.
This type of structure gives rise to systems that are shell-based.
So, a Solar.System contains as its central system a Pluto.Star and a Pluto.star contains as its central system a Neptune.Star and so on and so on. The Stars in this structure are the equivalent of Shells.
Can this type of structure describe Reality? I think so.
95
Just Chat! / Re: Is there a universal moral standard?
« Last post by hamdani yusuf on 15/05/2024 17:35:32 »Why Good People Comply with Evil - Daniel Schmachtenberger
Quote
In this episode Daniel answers the question, "Why should people care about global existential issues?". He cites 2 experiments, the "Milgram experiment" (1961) and the "Asch conformity experiments" to serve as examples of how good people can be complicit with evil acts.
96
Just Chat! / Re: Is there a universal moral standard?
« Last post by hamdani yusuf on 15/05/2024 17:32:47 »The Psychology of Moral Disengagement
Quote
Moral disengagement is a process of cognitive restructuring that allows individuals to disassociate from their internal moral standards and behave unethically without feeling distressed. It is the story we tell ourselves to not feel bad about inhumane actions that normally would go against our moral principles, or the excuses we find to avoid feeling guilty about hurting others.In principle, moral evaluation can be done based on how accurate someone's assessment of cause and effect relationship with their actions.
97
New Theories / Re: Jano's relativity denials
« Last post by Kryptid on 15/05/2024 17:06:26 »Right, the current relativity does not have explanation for it.
It isn't supposed to, not any more than it's supposed to explain why sugar is sweet.
Having said that, if there is a preferred frame than the force between electron and proton varies based on the hydrogen atom speed in the preferred frame as shown in the thought experiment.
When the hydrogen atom slows down in the preferred frame the force is stronger and the electron is pulled to lower energy state. Suddenly 'spontaneous' emission has a cause.
The 'relativity' anchored in the preferred frame can explain the emissions.
There is no preferred frame. The isotropy of the speed of light has been demonstrated to extremely high precision.
98
New Theories / Re: Could quantum mechanics be wrong?
« Last post by hamdani yusuf on 15/05/2024 16:47:52 »Let's begin with your perspective. What unexpected observation have you made?There's no way I can guarantee that nobody else has expected my observations. But at least I know they deviate from some mainstream textbooks.
I've made many experiments using laser and microwave transceiver, and some results that I think are unexpected by most people are as follows.
Non-diffractive edge and non-diffractive slit using total internal reflection.
Polarized diffraction by the edge of abortive polarizers.
Blocking mechanism of microwave by partial polarizers.
Conjoined twin polarizers.
Polarization twister of microwave.
Electrodynamic balance.
99
New Theories / Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« Last post by hamdani yusuf on 15/05/2024 16:31:03 »Precisely my point. He can't tell B's time simply by looking at his own clock: he has to make a lot of assumptions. That's relativity.
How does it (looking only at his own clock) help solving the twin paradox, which is the main objective of this thread?He can verify his assumptions by asking an external inertial observer,Which is not "simply by looking at his own clock". Try reading the question before questioning the answer.
100
New Theories / Re: How do we measure the energy of a photon?
« Last post by mxplxxx on 15/05/2024 16:21:21 »A simulation of what?A simulation of the universe. Note that simulations can surpass the original in power. This is very obvious in AI's simulation of the human brain via neural networks.
Our computer simulations are surpassing what evolution is capable of. Our future is one of computer simulations.
Is this evolution itself evolving? Looks like it. And maybe evolution is going to make it hard for us to evolve with a new paradigm. Also, very likely.