0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
All three explanations might be at least part of the reason. It's not clear to me that they mean the same thing but so what?Unless you can prove that these (and all other non-conspiracy theories) are all wrong then you really haven't added anything.3 people put forward 3 ideas that they think might be an explanation. One or more of them might be right. You seem to think that, because the answeres are not identical it means they are all wrong. That's nonsense.Meanwhile you post stuff like "They contradicted each other because they weren't organized."Well, shouldn't you make up your mind?Either they are so organised that they have kept pretty much everyone convinced for decades or they are not organised.You can't have it both ways.
I still wonder how they got the Russians in on this. Without their confirmation of the origin of the radio messages from the moon, there would be some sort of value to this "debate". With the Russians having agreed that the Yanks got there, there's no way it was faked.
The retroreflectors on the moon were put there by an act of God.
Well, if the Russians were in on it and the Americans too, what about the Chinese?No, come to think of it it's easier to say "OK, you are right; everybody on the plannet has been lying to you all along."
If Chinese newspapers were saying Apollo was a hoax, the US press woundn't have reported it.
why would Russia allow itself to look inferior to the US?
Watch these videos.http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=moonfaker++cold+war&search_type=&aq=fYou should read Chomsky's analysis of the cold war. It's in a book of his called "Deterring Democracy"He talks about how both the US and the Soviets exagerated about the confrontation they were having in order to scare their respective populations into going along with their policies. According to Chomsky they were cooperating much more than we knew.
why do you so badly want this to be a hoax?
The US papers might not have reported it, but you seem not to have noticed that roughly 95% of the world's population doesn't live in the US. The rest of us would have heard about it- via Japan would be an obvious route for the information to have travelled.
If it were to turn out not to be a hoax, I'd be happy about it. The evidence leads to a hoax. I keep posting the same stuff over and over. You people respond as if I hadn't posted anything.
Well, how did the media fall for this?Well, the media doesn't fall for anything. The media is controlled by the government. The Dutch papers on July 21 said that the moon landing was a hoax, was a fake, and I have been unable to find any of those Dutch papers, although it's well documented that they did publish information, with proof, that the U.S. was spoofing everybody.
“Weapons of Mass Destruction” Or was that last word Distraction? Used to launch a war on a country that did not have an air force or even an effective army. Yet two of the world’s most successful aggressors were able to launch an assault on a relatively unarmed country killing and maiming innocent men women and children with their own weapons of mass destruction and at the same time convincing the rest of the world that their war is a just one.So let us at least dismiss the arguments that deception on a huge scale is not possible.