0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Your original claim is that the currently-accepted model contradicts itself.
The field is merely the way that the poles communicate with each other.
Please provide reference of where I say that.
But when you own science contradicts your own model, it is time to look for an alternative model.
The field around a magnet is not and cannot be a single pole according to the contradiction of your own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_lawQuoteThe law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.This here says my first premise has call for questioning.You and I both know likewise polarities mean expansion. If all points of a field were likewise in polarity, the field will expand according to physical laws. If it doe snot expand then it is not a single pole field.
The law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.
''You'' are telling me a likewise field does not expand but on the other hand saying likewise repulses. That is a contradiction.
communicate really? they can speak?
Why do you ignore the actual theory and keep trying to defend present information?
If it were not polarity , all charge and energies would be likewise and not do anything.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/11/2017 22:53:37There isn't any physics to attack.bs
There isn't any physics to attack.
Quote from: Thebox on 12/11/2017 00:14:53Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/11/2017 22:53:37There isn't any physics to attack.bsThere is plenty of bs, but no physics.Please address at least one of those aspects.And I'm going to keep asking this until you answer it:How have you come to the conclusion that, though you don't actually understand basic science, you are somehow in the top 5%?
bs = though you don't actually understand basic science,
You don't understand Physics that is why you are a chemist
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 22:34:48You don't understand Physics that is why you are a chemistAnd what are you? You certainly don't work in any science related field. Decorator wasn't it?
Would you like to try that in English?
Quote from: Thebox on 12/11/2017 00:15:48Please provide reference of where I say that.Here you are:Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 16:31:54But when you own science contradicts your own model, it is time to look for an alternative model. Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 16:42:50The field around a magnet is not and cannot be a single pole according to the contradiction of your own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_lawQuoteThe law has been tested extensively, and all observations have upheld the law's principle.This here says my first premise has call for questioning.You and I both know likewise polarities mean expansion. If all points of a field were likewise in polarity, the field will expand according to physical laws. If it doe snot expand then it is not a single pole field. Quote''You'' are telling me a likewise field does not expand but on the other hand saying likewise repulses. That is a contradiction.It certainly sounds like you are saying that the currently-accepted model of electromagnetics contradicts itself. If that's not what you are saying, then good. The currently-accepted model explains existing phenomena, unlike your N-field which can't explain neutron-related phenomena and we are supposed to overlook that major flaw because you are an "amateur scientist" with a "young theory".Quote from: Thebox on 12/11/2017 00:23:25communicate really? they can speak?I'm using communication in its loosest sense. Communication is an exchange of information. I guess that means you don't think sign language is a form of communication, since you seem to think communication automatically implies speaking. Fields exchange information about the particles that generate them. That's what I meant by "communicate".QuoteWhy do you ignore the actual theory and keep trying to defend present information?When you say "the actual theory", are you talking about your N-field or about the currently-accepted model of matter? If you'll recall, I did address your theory and pointed out the holes in it regarding its inability to explain neutron-related phenomena. You responded by complaining about being an amateur scientist with a young theory. If you are going to acknowledge short-comings in your own ideas, then you need to be more humble about it instead of insisting that you've got the right idea and everyone else is wrong.QuoteIf it were not polarity , all charge and energies would be likewise and not do anything. You keep conflating the polarity of a field and the charge that generates the field. That's like saying that a rock dropped into a pool and the waves created by that rock are the same thing.
A positive or negative can not exist independently of each other.
Quote from: Thebox on 11/11/2017 22:34:48You don't understand Physics that is why you are a chemistIt's the all about me show , wow, discuss science or don't bother posting,
Make a fist, open your fist sharply making a pfff sound as you do it, that is what likewise polarity energy does, it goes pfff and expands .
You've yet to demonstrate that such a thing actually happens in real life.
likewise polarities can not exist without opposite polarites
Except, as has been pointed out, they do.
Coulumb's law shows this
Likewise can not exist itself.
The repulsion would not allow the existence
Likewise polarities repulselikewise polarities can not exist without opposite polaritesQ.F.S is real and can be shown with magnets.
Quote from: Thebox on 12/11/2017 18:09:12Likewise polarities repulselikewise polarities can not exist without opposite polaritesQ.F.S is real and can be shown with magnets.So how do you explain the existence of cathode rays?
Ions maybe, I am not really familiar with a Cathode ray nor how a CRT screen works.
If you took an imaginary ball of positive polarity energy in your hand and squeezed it , it would have an opposing force?