0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think it is quite clear
a sustains b's form and b sustains a's form.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 19:18:16I think it is quite clear Can you find a single person who agrees with you?
Quote from: Thebox on 25/02/2018 22:01:54a sustains b's form and b sustains a's form. OK, so, if we use copper nuclei (as an example) instead of protons then the box with electrons is a lump of copper.Hardly cutting edge.Since (some of ) the electrons are the outermost bit of the box you have finally found the system I pointed out earlier.The "box" (The stuff that holds the electrons together) is inside the electrons.I explained this to you herehttps://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=72338.msg533308#msg533308a week or two ago.
there is no electron without a proton.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 19:41:29there is no electron without a proton.In the real world we have videos of them.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS2pKyRKeYs
So, the n field keeps the elephants away.http://www.medical-jokes.com/its-to-keep-the-elephants-away/
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/02/2018 19:24:18Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 19:18:16I think it is quite clear Can you find a single person who agrees with you?
You must not:ignore inconvenient facts or relevant considerations when providing advice or making decisions
Also I think it was Alan who agreed I had found gravity mechanism .
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 09:09:26Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/02/2018 19:24:18Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 19:18:16I think it is quite clear Can you find a single person who agrees with you?Actually yes, the person who is emailing me and helping with my edit on the paper. They understood and told me I should not give up on this idea.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 10:49:24Also I think it was Alan who agreed I had found gravity mechanism . Does Alan think so?Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 10:49:24Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/02/2018 09:09:26Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/02/2018 19:24:18Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 19:18:16I think it is quite clear Can you find a single person who agrees with you?Actually yes, the person who is emailing me and helping with my edit on the paper. They understood and told me I should not give up on this idea. Can you find anyone who is actually prepared to say in public that they agree with youAlso, is your email correspondent qualified?
The person whom I speak to in email has told me they have written several books.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 18:17:57The person whom I speak to in email has told me they have written several books. So has J K Rowling, but it doesn't qualify her to comment on a hypothesis in physics.
However, I am sure everyone should be able to agree with my latest short explanation?
Quote from: Thebox on 27/02/2018 19:08:43However, I am sure everyone should be able to agree with my latest short explanation?I'm still waiting for you to produce a single real person who agrees with it.I can produce at least one person (me) who says it's nonsense.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/02/2018 18:19:53Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/02/2018 18:16:35So it isn't clear what you are saying unless you accept that you are talking nonsense.So you don't understand but declare it nonsense? NoI am saying that, if you don't explain it then it will make sense to nobody.And that will mean it is nonsense.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/02/2018 18:16:35So it isn't clear what you are saying unless you accept that you are talking nonsense.So you don't understand but declare it nonsense?
So it isn't clear what you are saying unless you accept that you are talking nonsense.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/02/2018 19:09:31Quote from: Thebox on 25/02/2018 18:19:53Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/02/2018 18:16:35So it isn't clear what you are saying unless you accept that you are talking nonsense.So you don't understand but declare it nonsense? NoI am saying that, if you don't explain it then it will make sense to nobody.And that will mean it is nonsense.