1
New Theories / Re: Where does quantization of energy of electromagnetic radiation come from?
« on: Today at 11:16:25 »Different phenomena.No. Tunneling is an entirely different phenomenon.Are you fine with the word leap?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Different phenomena.No. Tunneling is an entirely different phenomenon.Are you fine with the word leap?
He postulated that some orbits are stable, hence electrons occupying them don't radiate energy.Orbiting equals acceleration. Accelerating charges emit electromagnetic radiation. So the classical model is wrong.
No. It's why Bohr proposed his model, against Rutherford's planetary model.Bohr's electrons orbit, That's the problem.
You can say that they casually leap or tunnel.No. Tunneling is an entirely different phenomenon.
It suggests that electrons can disappear from their previous positions and reappear in new position without traveling through the space in between.
Is there a formula to calculate the other's clock, when their relative position and motion are known?Yes. Time dilatation formula. It's sufficiently accurate to allow GPS navigation.
Perhaps a simulation of what are possible under some mathematical models with some chosen assumptions.Which means it must simulate itself if it is to be a complete simulation. If it isn't a complete, it isn't a universe.
Even making good standards is just an instrumental goal, serving to help achieving the common terminal goals among the users of the standards.In the case of public water supply, there are two quite different terminal goals: profit and sterility. EU rules, as implemented by the UK government, dismissed the second.
Based on the radiation patterns that we can measure for various shapes of antenna where we can control the motion of the electrons, we can calculate backwards to infer how electrons should move around the nucleus to produce radiation patterns resembling known atomic orbitals. It will require adequately accurate and precise electrodynamic model.It is precisely the absence of electromagnetic emission from atoms in equilibrium that put an end to the Bohr atom.
It's as if electrons can magically jump from one region with high probability to another regions without having to travel the space between them.There's no implication that they magically jump. If you start with a classical model, you probably won't derive a quantum result, but if you start with a quantum and probabilistic model, you can usefully predict molecular orbitals that correspond with ball-and-stick models, crystallographic measurements, and observed spectra.
I recently spoke to a guy on Twitter who designed side-impact protection for cars, so I asked him if there was any evidence that SIP had saved any lives. He didn't have an answer, and the more I pressed him the more he squirmed.It's relatively easy to assess the damage to occupants caused by a lateral collision, then check the statistics of percentage fatalities normalised by probable impact speed. Intuitively, I doubt that anyone is more tempted to drive into vehicle A rather than B because A has SIP, so a first-order approximation would suffice.