0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:03:06Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:58:41Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about. Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ? No, it is something you have made up pigeon.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:58:41Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about. Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ?
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that .
Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:06:49Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:03:06Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:58:41Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about. Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ? No, it is something you have made up pigeon. Really ? So you are saying a proton charge and an electron charge doesn't measure neutral , no net charge ? Are you suggesting the very field you walk through is a positive or negative charge ?
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:13:27Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:06:49Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:03:06Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:58:41Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about. Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ? No, it is something you have made up pigeon. Really ? So you are saying a proton charge and an electron charge doesn't measure neutral , no net charge ? Are you suggesting the very field you walk through is a positive or negative charge ? You have not demonstrated such a field exists. You are trying to blag it, pigeon.
Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:21:01Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence Oh yeah? How? You do talk a lot of utter crap. What do I think stops some of the earth's ray entering the atmosphere? Atomic absorption.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:28:10Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:21:01Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence Oh yeah? How? You do talk a lot of utter crap. What do I think stops some of the earth's ray entering the atmosphere? Atomic absorption. The North pole is ''falling'' to outer space but the interior spatial field pushes back , Newtons third law . Are you suggesting there is no earth electromagnetic field being emitted ?
Full of it arent you pigeon?
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:35:04 Full of it arent you pigeon? Not at all , I understand the Universe very well . You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ? Did you never learn about buoyancy ? [/quoteQuote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:39:21Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:35:04 Full of it arent you pigeon? Not at all , I understand the Universe very well . You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ? Did you never learn about buoyancy ? Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:35:04 Full of it arent you pigeon? Not at all , I understand the Universe very well . You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ? Did you never learn about buoyancy ?
Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?
Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:46:12Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?I think you should learn about buoyancy and the displacement of mass using large areas such as a parachute . Consider the biggest boat you can think of , that is a needle considering space and the earths area .
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/04/2019 18:49:34Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.Yes an interwoven fabric like Einstein thought , except he never explained what this fabric was . There is no reason any given point of space cannot be occupied by a negative and positive point charge simultaneously , the consequent of this , interwoven points of energy that make up a field .
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:49:44Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 18:46:12Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?I think you should learn about buoyancy and the displacement of mass using large areas such as a parachute . Consider the biggest boat you can think of , that is a needle considering space and the earths area . Given the amount that I sail I don't really need lessons from you. Plus you are spouting irrelevant gibberish.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 18:52:31Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/04/2019 18:49:34Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.Yes an interwoven fabric like Einstein thought , except he never explained what this fabric was . There is no reason any given point of space cannot be occupied by a negative and positive point charge simultaneously , the consequent of this , interwoven points of energy that make up a field . And you think it is nylon presumably?
No idea , I don't use that
Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 19:40:48Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:24:32Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 18:22:43Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:20:26because that would be the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u . What does the u mean?Internal energy , Do you mean this?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_energyOr do you mean something made up?Of course I mean that , my theory conforms to present physics .
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:24:32Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 18:22:43Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:20:26because that would be the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u . What does the u mean?Internal energy , Do you mean this?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_energyOr do you mean something made up?
Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 18:22:43Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:20:26because that would be the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u . What does the u mean?Internal energy ,
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 18:20:26because that would be the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u . What does the u mean?
because that would be the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u .
, what you have posted is plainly false.We can all stop now.Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody else accidentally takes it seriously?
Hydrogen doesn't combust as such
So, what you have posted is plainly false.We can all stop now.Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody else accidentally takes it seriously?
Also re.Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 08:35:42Hydrogen doesn't combust as such Yes, it does.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgWHbpMVQ1USo, as I saidQuote from: Bored chemist on 02/04/2019 19:29:57So, what you have posted is plainly false.We can all stop now.Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody else accidentally takes it seriously?