0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Duffyd asksBut, how can science prove love exists? Which tools does science bring to the table proving that what you've described is love? GG: This is for future science. ....
Love, a definition: Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.
Why would anyone believe in love if science can't prove that it even exists,
Good point
Quote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 10:15:04Why would anyone believe in love if science can't prove that it even exists, So you have decided to ignore the Harvard site? Because it does not support your idea?The research shows that when people say they are in love, there are measurable physical changes in the brain and body which show they are not making it up. Those emotions are real.Are you denying that those physical changes take place?Quote from: jerrygg38 on 03/05/2020 12:30:51Good pointNo, rubbish point
, but science can't even prove it exists.
Why would anyone believe in love if science can't prove that it even exists
...Christians have exactly the same physical responses.
DuffyD asks: Can I give you my wife's work address?GG: For what purpose? Do you want an autographed copy of my book? Are you in the USA?
DuffyD said:You said you were getting pretty darn good at controlling lightning strikes. I thought if you weren't too busy, you might pop by her place of employment and work a little magic and zap her building and its contents into 24 trillions bits. Just kidding. GG: That was in 1981. I have no ability on my own. God has the ability to control my mind and I suspect that my lightning experiment was more mind control than reality.I tried to get the spirit to lift a chair in my basement. It would not. Thus God could not readily lift a chair however excessive spiritual energy would destroy an object. The body of Jesus was most likely destroyed by spiritual radiation which also move the rock. As a child I always demanded small miracles as verification of the words and dreams. In the country for vacation I saw an interesting rabbit one day. I asked to see the same rabbit the next day at the same location. This happened for sure but the rabbit was dead. God killed it. Why? It seems that God did not want to always confirm his message in small miracles.
Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
Quote from: jerrygg38 on 02/05/2020 10:25:35Duffyd asksBut, how can science prove love exists? Which tools does science bring to the table proving that what you've described is love? GG: This is for future science. ....Sorry jerry, you are way behind the times, as well as moving off topic.The science of love has been studied and includes not just hormone measurements but MRI, bodily reactions etcThere is a summary on the Harvard site http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/love-actually-science-behind-lust-attraction-companionship/
Then, Colin asks me if I'm ignoring the Harvard site. "So you have decided to ignore the Harvard site? Because it does not support your idea?"Colin didn't mention the Harvard site to me. He mentioned it to GG.
I was aware of the studies that show an increase in the flow of neurotransmitters in the brains of those who are in love.
Quote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 10:09:47, but science can't even prove it exists.Liar.You were just told (by Colin) that science can show that love exists.Quote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 10:15:04Why would anyone believe in love if science can't prove that it even existsDoubly wrong.Science can show that love exists.You were already told that.
Quote from: duffyd on 07/05/2020 00:51:41Then, Colin asks me if I'm ignoring the Harvard site. "So you have decided to ignore the Harvard site? Because it does not support your idea?"Colin didn't mention the Harvard site to me. He mentioned it to GG.The reply was published in a public thread you were following.However, the question is still valid as you also saidQuote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 14:50:23I was aware of the studies that show an increase in the flow of neurotransmitters in the brains of those who are in love. So your earlier statements were deliberately misleading as suggested by BCQuote from: Bored chemist on 03/05/2020 14:38:20Quote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 10:09:47, but science can't even prove it exists.Liar.You were just told (by Colin) that science can show that love exists.Quote from: duffyd on 03/05/2020 10:15:04Why would anyone believe in love if science can't prove that it even existsDoubly wrong.Science can show that love exists.You were already told that.Why do you deliberately mislead people. You are denying Christ when you do that; Peter did it 3 times, how many times will you do it?
Don't call me a liar again or I will report you to the powers that be. Don't expect replies in the future.