41
New Theories / Free energy motor using gravity and mass
« on: 02/05/2018 14:40:18 »
I use the same method than my theoretical device:
Blue color is a liquid, water for example. White color is a solid, like polystyrene. Gravity is vertical. The volume of the container is constant. At start, I have inside the container near 100% of polystyrene, at final I have inside the container 71% of polystyrene and 29% of water. At start, I have 29% of water outside, at final I have 29% of polystyrene outside the container. I drew 19 white rectangles but it is possible to have 100 or more for the same volume. The thickness of the white rectangles is constant, I change the length from the bottom or I pass the white rectangle through the lower wall (it is the same calculation). The white rectangles rotate around their axes of rotation A2 to A20. I move out (perpendicularly to the screen) from the bottom the parts of polystyrene (or I pass through the lower wall) and I move in WATER (perpendicularly to the screen) inside the container all along the white rectangles (between the white rectangles of polystyrene). I don't need calculations but I give it later. I compared 2 cases.
xy2.png (46.56 kB . 999x836 - viewed 4968 times)
Case 1/ I move the white parts from the bottom and I move in white parts all along between white rectangles and I attache the parts to the white rectangles all along them: The sum of energy is conserved.
Case 2/ I move out the whites parts from the bottom and I move in the water all along between white rectangle: The sum of energy is not conserved.
Case 2 at final:
du1.png (34.96 kB . 999x835 - viewed 4975 times)
It is the same device than the theoretical device, except I use gravity and mass (water or another liquid). The animation:
e1.gif (462.74 kB . 965x661 - viewed 5063 times)
If I pass through the lower wall, at final the device is like that:
fin2.png (9.74 kB . 431x474 - viewed 4311 times)
No ?
Blue color is a liquid, water for example. White color is a solid, like polystyrene. Gravity is vertical. The volume of the container is constant. At start, I have inside the container near 100% of polystyrene, at final I have inside the container 71% of polystyrene and 29% of water. At start, I have 29% of water outside, at final I have 29% of polystyrene outside the container. I drew 19 white rectangles but it is possible to have 100 or more for the same volume. The thickness of the white rectangles is constant, I change the length from the bottom or I pass the white rectangle through the lower wall (it is the same calculation). The white rectangles rotate around their axes of rotation A2 to A20. I move out (perpendicularly to the screen) from the bottom the parts of polystyrene (or I pass through the lower wall) and I move in WATER (perpendicularly to the screen) inside the container all along the white rectangles (between the white rectangles of polystyrene). I don't need calculations but I give it later. I compared 2 cases.
xy2.png (46.56 kB . 999x836 - viewed 4968 times)
Case 1/ I move the white parts from the bottom and I move in white parts all along between white rectangles and I attache the parts to the white rectangles all along them: The sum of energy is conserved.
Case 2/ I move out the whites parts from the bottom and I move in the water all along between white rectangle: The sum of energy is not conserved.
Case 2 at final:
du1.png (34.96 kB . 999x835 - viewed 4975 times)
It is the same device than the theoretical device, except I use gravity and mass (water or another liquid). The animation:
e1.gif (462.74 kB . 965x661 - viewed 5063 times)
If I pass through the lower wall, at final the device is like that:
fin2.png (9.74 kB . 431x474 - viewed 4311 times)
No ?