0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well, there's one similarity. Phlogiston was overturned by a better understanding of chemistry and SR was overturned by GR.
This figure, especially (c) indicates that gravitational lens is possible without acceleration (a = 0).
You can't be serious?You could as easily say that this universe is purely local, and in that case there is no 'eye of a God'. whenever someone invoke that 'eye' he or she makes a lot of presumptions, unproven. This thread belongs definitely to 'New Theories' or possibly 'Meta Physics'.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 07/03/2019 09:18:37This figure, especially (c) indicates that gravitational lens is possible without acceleration (a = 0). Did anyone say it wasn't?
Please examine the attached figure.
Did anyone say it wasn't?
Quote from: xersanozgen on 08/03/2019 12:03:42Please examine the attached figure.Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/03/2019 19:14:48Did anyone say it wasn't?
does not need accelerating of cabinet.
Why do you keep saying that?Nobody said it did need the cabinet to accelerate.
We must analyze the universal events by the God's eye
Quote from: xersanozgen on 10/03/2019 13:32:21We must analyze the universal events by the God's eye 1- He doesn't exist.2- You really need to put some effort into making more sense.
And the only way to do that it to accept GR.