1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 11:50:31 »
Well, photons can come in different intensities, frequencies, that also becomes what proves that they have different energy states. and then we have the momentum created through their 'speed'. They don't have a rest mass as far as I know though. But using the mass-energy equivalence you can argue that it is conservation of momentum that defines a photon recoil, once emitted, As well as conservation of energy should have something to do with it.
So where do they come from, those conservation laws?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_law
So where do they come from, those conservation laws?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_law
3
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:41:48 »
So did we accelerate that piece of iron by heating it up?
4
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:34:05 »
And if now this solar system would speed up? To then return to a uniform motion through space? You shouldn't weight any more that you did before. With some caveats as it becomes quite tricky to think off, a whole solarsystem interacting, but the principle remains
5
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:29:41 »
Well, if in space you're weightless actually, and will stay so no matter what uniform 'speed' someone calls out for you. In a constant 'free fall', On Earth though there's a weight to it, because Earth is constantly and uniformly 'accelerating' at approximately one gravity.
6
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:24:27 »
where the momentum you have is immeasurable, in any uniform motion. Think of that as being inside a black box, where the only thing you have is that scale you can weight yourself on. What someone else will call your speed doesn't matter. Your weight won't change.
7
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:21:08 »
They add to something else, they add to the momentum
8
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:17:55 »
But speeds doesn't add energy.
9
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:17:16 »
It got energy added to it, where that energy became a weight gain
10
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:13:52 »
Let's go back to the difference between accelerations and uniform (relative) motions, in relativity. I stated that it doesn't matter what you set your speed to, relative something else, earth, asteroids, your shoe or the rabbits, whatever. There is no measurable change in your rest mass, that light bulb won't glow any stronger just because you're in a new, faster, relative motion. But heat up a piece of iron and its weight will change.
11
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:08:22 »
As knzhou so beautifully express it. You stirring the water with your finger are doing two things. You are transmitting energy, and information.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/426608/why-does-an-accelerated-charge-radiate-away-energy
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/426608/why-does-an-accelerated-charge-radiate-away-energy
13
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 09:44:37 »
photons are information carriers, as is waves.
14
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 09:43:05 »
And it contains information. Without that information this world wouldn't exist for you, and this text would not be seen
15
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 09:40:45 »
It have something more, it has an energy, not only momentum.
16
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 09:38:15 »
Light is strange, it can't be 'accelerated' and not 'slowed' either, even though we have experiments 'freezing light'. Instead of 'speeding up' it blue shifts, 'slowing down' becomes a red shift. And it always have the same speed, for all observers involved in measuring it, no matter their relative motion versus each other and everything else. And it doesn't have a mass
17
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 09:34:08 »
Never mind. Let's do some weird physics. What I think of as a very supportive argument for something else than light 'propagating' are our physical laws, the ones we found recently. Take f.ex the 'recoil' existing as a light quanta (photon) gets emitted. It doesn't have a mass. But we have something called conservation laws in physics which demands this recoil. A momentum is about propulsion and for a gun you will need chemical energy exploding (burning) in the cartridge propelling a bullet. That force goes both ways, pushing the bullet while pushing the gun in opposite directions.
but lights momentum isn't really about a force 'exploding', at least not as I understands it. It's about a force only directed forward and without accelerations involved. It's never 'at rest', so how does it create a recoil?
Conservation of momentum.
" Momentum is defined to be the mass of an object multiplied by the velocity of the object. The conservation of momentum states that, within some problem domain, the amount of momentum remains constant; momentum is neither created nor destroyed, but only changed through the action of forces as described by Newton's laws of motion. "
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/conmo.html
but lights momentum isn't really about a force 'exploding', at least not as I understands it. It's about a force only directed forward and without accelerations involved. It's never 'at rest', so how does it create a recoil?
Conservation of momentum.
" Momentum is defined to be the mass of an object multiplied by the velocity of the object. The conservation of momentum states that, within some problem domain, the amount of momentum remains constant; momentum is neither created nor destroyed, but only changed through the action of forces as described by Newton's laws of motion. "
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/conmo.html
18
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 07:22:49 »
You want to call it civilization?
I call it a travesty
I call it a travesty
19
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 07:13:54 »
You should read this one, and then think of our next odyssey into a third world war with Russia, and probably China too. Which either will start nuclear, or build up to it conventionally. All because some ruffled feathers for our glorious politicians. They can't be seen wrong you see, not if they want to get reelected. It's 2024, not 1937. Where Russia has been eminently clear about that one. And if you think it can't be USA, or us in Europe making that first strike you're terribly wrong, They tested it once you see, on Japan.
So you act by example, and all your examples are bad
https://www.newarab.com/analysis/ecocide-gaza-environmental-impact-israels-war
So you act by example, and all your examples are bad
https://www.newarab.com/analysis/ecocide-gaza-environmental-impact-israels-war
20
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 06:21:05 »
As for the ICC
" The scholar, whose research focuses on the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, explained that the top court would move more quickly where countries were willing to cooperate, which is not true in the context of the Gaza war.
"It's very unfortunate. Israel will not permit ICC investigators to enter Israel or Gaza, and G7 states won't cooperate with the ICC," he said."
Israel, and G7
" " The Group of Seven (G7) is an intergovernmental political and economic forum consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States; additionally, the European Union (EU) is a "non-enumerated member". "
So much for values, and 'democracy'. No, I don't want Sweden included in this travesty, but I have no longer a choice, do I? With us both in the EU, and in NATO.
https://www.newarab.com/analysis/will-icc-issue-arrest-warrants-israeli-officials
" The scholar, whose research focuses on the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, explained that the top court would move more quickly where countries were willing to cooperate, which is not true in the context of the Gaza war.
"It's very unfortunate. Israel will not permit ICC investigators to enter Israel or Gaza, and G7 states won't cooperate with the ICC," he said."
Israel, and G7
" " The Group of Seven (G7) is an intergovernmental political and economic forum consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States; additionally, the European Union (EU) is a "non-enumerated member". "
So much for values, and 'democracy'. No, I don't want Sweden included in this travesty, but I have no longer a choice, do I? With us both in the EU, and in NATO.
https://www.newarab.com/analysis/will-icc-issue-arrest-warrants-israeli-officials