41
New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« on: 11/11/2022 21:59:12 »I'm sure there is a lot wrong with that scenario in the Mainstream point of view, but I am not offended when considered a fringe character. The simple scenario that I propose has been stated above in single paragraphs, and often in single sentences, with only passing admission that I don't shy away from what goes against the mainstream; sorry for using this "on the lighter side, new theories" sub-forum space to expose my alternative ideas, but the places where wild ideas can be stated in reputable forums like this one are few.
...
I think Big Bangs happen all the time, here and there, now and then, but are far removed from each other in space, and are preceded by a lengthy period of gravitational accumulation of matter (into a lump) from a swath of surrounding space. The growth of the crunch continues to a point of "critical mass", which when reached, the local gravitational force defeats the atomic forces at work within and among atoms, and the crunch fails/collapses with a Bang.
What's wrong with that scenario?
165248,165276,165306,165389,
The following users thanked this post: Zer0