0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/study-guide/
I do believe myself that anti-gravity exists. I feel the fundamental evidence lies within air. You and everyone else on the planet will consider this as buoyancy, however I believe when the E entropy of air changes, this has affect on the gravity mechanism within the atom, increasing or decreasing the gravity magnitude potential. I also believe the earth does not fall into the sun because likewise polarities stop this from happening, a sort of cushioned dampening field between bodies. If you can consider something falling from the sky that had a field surrounding it, when the object falls through a likewise field , the object will slow down and my basis for this is simply magnetic suspension, the object ''floats'' on the field, the object is not buoyant it is being repulsed by equal field polarities. That is a little bit of thought from me about the anti-gravitational properties of things like air that are ''buoyant''.
Ok, I have glanced at your link, but for clarity of your idea can you please summon up your idea in a single paragraph?
A hitherto unknown physical interaction between any angular momentum and perpendicular magnetic and electric fields.
QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/abraham-minkowski/
The Abraham–Minkowski controversy is a physics debate concerning electromagnetic momentum within dielectric media. Traditionally, it is argued that in the presence of matter the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor by itself is not conserved (divergenceless). Only the total stress-energy tensor carries unambiguous physical significance, and how one apportions it between an “electromagnetic” part and a “matter” part depends on context and convenience.[1] In other words, the electromagnetic part and the matter part in the total momentum can be arbitrarily distributed as long as the total momentum is kept the same. There are two incompatible equations to describe momentum transfer between matter and electromagnetic fields.[2] These two equations were first suggested by Hermann Minkowski (1908)[3] and Max Abraham (1909),[4][5] from which the controversy's name derives. Both were claimed to be supported by experimental data. Theoretically, it is usually argued that Abraham version of momentum “does indeed represent the true momentum density of electromagnetic fields” for electromagnetic waves,[6] while Minkowski version of momentum is “pseudomomentum”[6] or “wave momentum”.[7]This controversy inspired various theories admitting the existence of reactionless drives.[8][citation needed]
The two equations for the photon momentum are:
QUANTUM ANTIGRAVITYGravity is neither a fundamental force, nor a spacetime curvature. There are no physical, empirically detectable graviton particles, for the same reason that there are no magneton particles of the magnetic field. Magnetons and gravitons are at best virtual particles only.