The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:30:08 »
It's a funny world.
2
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:28:35 »
With speeds as well as gravitational accelerations being equivalent to being 'still'. And with mass being a equivalence to a acceleration, expressed locally as a weight
3
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:26:00 »
It becomes observer dependent, that one too. So what you observe is dependent on you, scales you use, the local clock you use, mass, speeds and accelerations..
4
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:20:52 »
Scaling has some interesting properties.
5
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:20:13 »
It would of course make any definition of a past or a future meaningless. locally defined.
6
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:17:14 »
Actually, thinking some more of it, it can be seen as both right and wrong. If we define entanglements, super positions and 'energy' as 'singularities'. At the limit of Planck scale 'c' can be seen as 'unmoving', the 'clock' I equalize 'c' to stopping. So from that specific local perspective time as we know it could be expressed as non existent.

Your 'qubit' of time frozen
7
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:08:51 »
This is correct though

" Essentially, entanglement involves two particles, each occupying multiple states at once—a condition referred to as superposition. For example, both particles may simultaneously spin clockwise and counterclockwise. But neither has a definite state until one is measured, causing the other particle to instantly assume a corresponding state. The resulting correlations between the particles are preserved, even if they reside on opposite ends of the universe. "

https://phys.org/news/2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormhole.html

If the rest is correct is up to you.. Strings are supposed to be at the very limit of Planck scale, and our physics breaks down there.
8
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 20:02:26 »
This one is interesting but as far as I see it doesn't destroy Einstein's type of locality, it's just a logic of inheritance.

With this being speculation, created through the concept of 'time' not existing.

" Measuring photon 1 may have set the future state of photon 4, or measuring photon 4 may have set the state of photon 1 in the past.  "

That's just wrong, time has a perfect local clock, always pointing into the future. 'c'

https://www.scienceandnonduality.com/article/physicists-entangle-particles-across-time

9
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 19:49:15 »
You could also look at it as entanglements, superposition's, 'energy' is a abstraction  building other abstractions, ending in a question, What is reality?
10
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« Last post by yor_on on Today at 19:39:22 »
Never mind. Just had to comment on that paper, as it answered a question I've been wondering about.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.