0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If it was DC, sure, but AC? A microwave field in a coaxial cable designed to keep it in?The basics are that if you have a DC wire carrying current in a magnetic field, yes, you will get movement, but AC, going back and forth...where's the direction and why? So stupid the criticism has been.
Direction of AC?Do you know what AC is?
Yeah....Tesla championed this idea against Edison......because of the fact so much energy would not be lost in using AC over vast distances compared to DC.
Not sure about your comment re. saucer design though....where's the "cup"....and the "tea"?
Box, go DC.....you might find something. You might need deep pockets. I've done that research, yet with your previous posts I wouldn't suggest it.
Quote from: opportunity on 13/07/2018 12:25:42Box, go DC.....you might find something. You might need deep pockets. I've done that research, yet with your previous posts I wouldn't suggest it.Well, you know I couldn't afford to do the experiments, so there is hardly a worry , although I could do it on a shoe string budget.
Thanks Kryptid. I understand what you're saying.I've done EM thruster research, and I know in using cables the RF needs shielding, otherwise you're facing a microwave field, literally, in your face. To say cables have movement with the Earth's magnetic field with cables designed not to bleed microwave fields is..... "odd".....to say the least.A coaxial cable is a Faraday cage.....they're not designed to bleed an RF....heat, maybe, not a RF.
Tell me that again...help me not hear nonsense...
I've offer you to understand me ( http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0215 ) ....and you're easy in making pot shots?
Quote from: Thebox on 13/07/2018 12:35:45Quote from: opportunity on 13/07/2018 12:25:42Box, go DC.....you might find something. You might need deep pockets. I've done that research, yet with your previous posts I wouldn't suggest it.Well, you know I couldn't afford to do the experiments, so there is hardly a worry , although I could do it on a shoe string budget. What's your budget?
Quote from: opportunity on 13/07/2018 17:49:16I've offer you to understand me ( http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0215 ) ....and you're easy in making pot shots?I'm not talking about warp fields or negative energy. I'm talking about an induced magnetic field generated by unshielded EM drive cables interacting with the Earth's magnetic field as a plausible explanation for the measured thrust. So which one of the following statements do you disagree with?- Electromagnetic radiation impinging on a conductive surface generates electric currents.- Electric currents generate magnetic fields.- Microwaves and magnetic fields are not the same thing.- Structures and materials that shield against microwaves will not necessarily shield against magnetic fields.- The Earth has a magnetic field.- Two magnetic fields experience a force between them.Also, are we talking about microwaves moving through a cable or electric current moving through wires? If the former, then why are you bringing up the issue of AC vs. DC? If the latter, then why are you talking about microwaves leaking or not leaking?
I see where the problem is, on two fronts.First, anyone who uses microwave RF energy HAS TO use VERY WELL shielded cables that leak next to NO RF energy.
Secondly, if you're NOT using a shielded cable with RF microwaves you're going to get BURNT.....and furthermore as that energy is relatively AC it won't move in ANY definite direction in a fixed magnetic field.
I've spent a LOT of time and money researching EM thrusters, and believe me, proper cables do NOT induce an EM field that interacts with the Earth's magnetic energy. Apologies if that sounds tierce.
I've spent a LOT of time and money researching EM thrusters,
Quote from: opportunity on 14/07/2018 03:50:08I see where the problem is, on two fronts.First, anyone who uses microwave RF energy HAS TO use VERY WELL shielded cables that leak next to NO RF energy.This is why I said that shielding against microwaves is not the same as shielding against magnetic fields. By all means, shield all of the microwaves that you want to. That won't necessarily shield any magnetic fields produced by the device.QuoteSecondly, if you're NOT using a shielded cable with RF microwaves you're going to get BURNT.....and furthermore as that energy is relatively AC it won't move in ANY definite direction in a fixed magnetic field.Microwaves are neither AC nor DC, so what are you talking about? Is this cable designed to carry electric current, microwaves or both?QuoteI've spent a LOT of time and money researching EM thrusters, and believe me, proper cables do NOT induce an EM field that interacts with the Earth's magnetic energy. Apologies if that sounds tierce.How does the cable avoid creating a magnetic field? The laws of physics seem to demand that it does.
Does that make sense so far?