0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Thebox on 03/11/2015 15:12:53I would at my own expense within reasonable distance travel and discuss anything I ever wrote in person with a chalk board, a light on a dimmer switch with a darkened room. I could show you all this gibberish in minutes. I dont even want the credit for it I just want you to get it right.Given your success rate over the last year, I don't think a few minutes would help anything...
I would at my own expense within reasonable distance travel and discuss anything I ever wrote in person with a chalk board, a light on a dimmer switch with a darkened room. I could show you all this gibberish in minutes. I dont even want the credit for it I just want you to get it right.
9,192,631,770 Hertz (Hz, or cycles per second)=1 second = 0.0288mile per second=46.3491072 meters per second
I have not equated anything,
Quote from: Thebox on 31/10/2015 10:03:019,192,631,770 Hertz (Hz, or cycles per second)=1 second = 0.288mile per second=46.3491072 meters per second.
9,192,631,770 Hertz (Hz, or cycles per second)=1 second = 0.288mile per second=46.3491072 meters per second
Lengthmetre, m: The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.......Time, Durationsecond, s: The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom..... When the physical metre held in Paris was abandoned as the standard length in 1983, the metre was defined as the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a specific fraction of a second. This effectively assigned the speed of light as a constant value.
And there you go again!
Then we can work out distances and speeds etc.
Quote from: Thebox on 03/11/2015 16:42:38Then we can work out distances and speeds etc. Not until you have defined a unit of length.
second, s: The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.....
They did using sun dials and circles , 86400/360=240 that is where 24 hrs comes from. One full circle divided up into increments. Even the hour clock finger travels a circle of distance equal to the earths spin.
Quote from: Thebox on 03/11/2015 16:55:03They did using sun dials and circles , 86400/360=240 that is where 24 hrs comes from. One full circle divided up into increments. Even the hour clock finger travels a circle of distance equal to the earths spin.You are confusing yourself. Solar time is measured by angle, not distance. A person on the equator travels about 25,000 miles per day. A person in Oslo travels about 8000 miles in the same time, and a person at the North Pole doesn't move at all, but their solar clocks are identical because their angular velocities are identical.
distance is used to measure time whether it be by angle or anything else,
Quote from: Thebox on 05/11/2015 08:27:55 distance is used to measure time whether it be by angle or anything else,Nonsense. Distance and angle are not the same. Prehistoric Man knew this when he built Stonehenge and similar trade calendars around the world: it take exactly the same time (one year) for the dawn sun to reappear at a given angle, regardless of latitude, but the distance travelled in that time can vary from zero to 8,760,000 miles depending on where you are.By your arithmetic, 8,760,000 = 0, but our neolithic ancestors had a better grip on reality.
You are wrong. Henges, pyramids, pendulums and cesium atoms only have one reference point. Timekeeping is about repetition, not amplitude. (Unless you are a drummer - a joke as old as music itself.)How you count or divide that repetition is entirely arbitrary. There are no degrees on a digital clock, and the markings on a sundial are not evenly spaced.