1
New Theories / are stars circling a galaxy orbiting or falling
« on: 01/05/2023 02:13:41 »
May I suggest a possible reason why stars circling about a rotating galaxy tend to have the same speed over a range of distance from the rotating center.
Looking at the gravitational properties of a large non-rotating mass, we see all smaller bodies travelling in the vicinity of the mass, beneath escape and orbital speeds, being captured and having their motions deviated towards a perpendicular direction onto the mass’s surface.
If we observe a group of captured small bodies initially travelling in various lateral directions at various distances away from a much larger mass and plot the distances when perpendicular direction of the falling bodies is achieved, we can come up with an average distance. The denser the mass the further the outreach of this distance.
Does a rotating mass behave the same way and affect surrounding bodies in the same manner regardless of spin rate? Or does it too want to manipulate its surrounding bodies to hit its surface in a perpendicular direction?
For a falling body to perpendicularity hit the surface of a rotating mass it would have to hit the surface while travelling laterally at tangential speed. Perhaps a rotating body deviates a perpendicular gravitational fall.
A downward gravitational pathway on the surface of the earth’s equator, travels laterally at tangential speed and continues to be tipped as the earth rotates. Does this process continue well above the surface?
Bodies falling towards a spinning mass are falling towards a surface that has a tangential lateral speed. So let’s start a fall of a body by placing it above a rotating mass and give it a lateral speed equal to the surfaces tangential speed just before release.
If the falling body maintains its aim of fall towards the center of the rotating mass while at same time always moving laterally at the tangential speed, its pathway inward will be a spiral.
If we give the body a different lateral speed before we let it fall (either faster or slower than tangential), then lateral fall forces, just like a non-rotating mass where the tangential speed is 0, will deviate its motion while it falls until the body achieves its proper lateral speed, which remains stable since that is the spinning mass’s perpendicular pathway.
Are stars falling into a rotating galaxy maneuvered into a lateral speed that matches tangential speed to ensure a perpendicular encounter with the border of the internal spinning center? Is a spiral pathway into a spinning galaxy a perpendicular fall and not an orbit?
If so then the more mass in the center of the rotating galaxy the sooner falling stars reach their perpendicular direction as they move laterally towards tangential speed and further is the outreach of its flat rotation curve.
Is it conceivable that if we propel a rocket ship towards a spinning planet (with no interfering atmosphere) and shut the engines off, that the ship will fall into the planet and encounter a surface in front whizzing by at its tangential speed? Or will the rocket ship deviate by lateral fall and enter the planet’s encircling space such that its rotation is no longer detected?
Looking at the gravitational properties of a large non-rotating mass, we see all smaller bodies travelling in the vicinity of the mass, beneath escape and orbital speeds, being captured and having their motions deviated towards a perpendicular direction onto the mass’s surface.
If we observe a group of captured small bodies initially travelling in various lateral directions at various distances away from a much larger mass and plot the distances when perpendicular direction of the falling bodies is achieved, we can come up with an average distance. The denser the mass the further the outreach of this distance.
Does a rotating mass behave the same way and affect surrounding bodies in the same manner regardless of spin rate? Or does it too want to manipulate its surrounding bodies to hit its surface in a perpendicular direction?
For a falling body to perpendicularity hit the surface of a rotating mass it would have to hit the surface while travelling laterally at tangential speed. Perhaps a rotating body deviates a perpendicular gravitational fall.
A downward gravitational pathway on the surface of the earth’s equator, travels laterally at tangential speed and continues to be tipped as the earth rotates. Does this process continue well above the surface?
Bodies falling towards a spinning mass are falling towards a surface that has a tangential lateral speed. So let’s start a fall of a body by placing it above a rotating mass and give it a lateral speed equal to the surfaces tangential speed just before release.
If the falling body maintains its aim of fall towards the center of the rotating mass while at same time always moving laterally at the tangential speed, its pathway inward will be a spiral.
If we give the body a different lateral speed before we let it fall (either faster or slower than tangential), then lateral fall forces, just like a non-rotating mass where the tangential speed is 0, will deviate its motion while it falls until the body achieves its proper lateral speed, which remains stable since that is the spinning mass’s perpendicular pathway.
Are stars falling into a rotating galaxy maneuvered into a lateral speed that matches tangential speed to ensure a perpendicular encounter with the border of the internal spinning center? Is a spiral pathway into a spinning galaxy a perpendicular fall and not an orbit?
If so then the more mass in the center of the rotating galaxy the sooner falling stars reach their perpendicular direction as they move laterally towards tangential speed and further is the outreach of its flat rotation curve.
Is it conceivable that if we propel a rocket ship towards a spinning planet (with no interfering atmosphere) and shut the engines off, that the ship will fall into the planet and encounter a surface in front whizzing by at its tangential speed? Or will the rocket ship deviate by lateral fall and enter the planet’s encircling space such that its rotation is no longer detected?