1
New Theories / Re: Could quantum mechanics be wrong?
« Last post by paul cotter on Today at 13:28:54 »Fully populated 1s shell.
There's no implication that they magically jump.You can say that they casually leap or tunnel. But what matters is what it means. It suggests that electrons can disappear from their previous positions and reappear in new position without traveling through the space in between.
It is precisely the absence of electromagnetic emission from atoms in equilibrium that put an end to the Bohr atom.No. It's why Bohr proposed his model, against Rutherford's planetary model.
There is no evidence of H2 spontaneously decomposing. There is a big difference between stability and reactivity.Why is Helium less reactive than H2?
Then why you said this?Is there a formula to calculate the other's clock, when their relative position and motion are known?Yes. Time dilatation formula. It's sufficiently accurate to allow GPS navigation.
if they accelerate equally in opposite directions and then stop, they would appear to an observer at the starting point to be synchronised to one another, but neither could tell the time on the other's clock (or the observer's) simply by looking at his own.
Is there a formula to calculate the other's clock, when their relative position and motion are known?Yes. Time dilatation formula. It's sufficiently accurate to allow GPS navigation.