0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The sky most likely is blue because of ozone
Quote from: JLindgaard on 14/10/2022 01:54:38The sky most likely is blue because of ozoneNope. Google is your friend on questions like this.
Unless scientists got it wrong.
It's not because of either water vapor or ozone, it's because of Rayleigh scattering: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scatteringIf it was because of ozone, you'd expect it to be blue at all times of the day (just getting darker shades of blue at sunset). Rayleigh scattering, meanwhile, explains why the sunset is reddish instead.
But you guys really have no clue about science, do you?
I liked science until posting in this forum.
Quote from: JLindgaard on 14/10/2022 06:04:57I liked science until posting in this forum.It seems to me that you actually like making stuff up and don't like that the people here are pointing out that making stuff up isn't science.
I thought this was the new theory section.
I know why they say the sky is blue.
You know, like CO2 is causing global warming while not all scientists agrees with that
I like the way you said "I'd expect" when I don't. You are placing conditions on how I think as a brainwashing technique.
Quote from: JLindgaard on 14/10/2022 06:04:57I like the way you said "I'd expect" when I don't. You are placing conditions on how I think as a brainwashing technique.I didn't mean it personally. When I said, "you'd expect", I was making a general prediction: if ozone was responsible for the blue color, it would be expected for the sky to be blue during all times of the day because ozone's color doesn't change from blue to red.
Not sure why you're bring red into it for.
Quote from: JLindgaard on 14/10/2022 18:40:14Not sure why you're bring red into it for.Because your model has to be able to explain why the sky is red at sunset.
In my book you get full marks for spotting anomalies and inconsistencies, but you need to be careful that your alternative explanatory hypothesis itself hangs together. So I agree that the idea of CO2 being principally responsible for controlling the temperature of the atmosphere is politically convenient and wrong, but we disagree on Rayleigh scattering because that theory entirely predicts and explains the observation, and yours doesn't.