0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Problem is, those clocks were not synchronized in the (approximate) inertial frame of the USA, a different frame (by over 1000 km/hr) that the GPS one they used to do the timing, so M&K are wrong in making that conclusion.
How can synchonizing the clock eliminates the difference in time measurements of the experiment?
. A careful examination by Zhang [3] however revealed that while two-way light speed constancy has been confirmed, one-way light speed constancy has not.
Why did you post a paper that talks about measuring the one way speed of light, when you know it is impossible?
It can be measured
Please stop understanding as it comes to your own business.
Quote from: Halc on 28/06/2020 01:15:13Problem is, those clocks were not synchronized in the (approximate) inertial frame of the USA, a different frame (by over 1000 km/hr) that the GPS one they used to do the timing, so M&K are wrong in making that conclusion.How can synchonizing the clock eliminates the difference in time measurements of the experiment?
In fact, relativistic mass is often reasoned away, so it can be ignored in peace.
After physics perfected this illusion, politics and now fake news have learn how to do it. Now political references and even the truth, are assumed to relative to any arbitrary political reference.
My LCS method for light kinematics can explaine these different results
In my opinion, the experiments (that are offered by me) will solve syncronization problems.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 28/06/2020 16:26:54In my opinion, the experiments (that are offered by me) will solve syncronization problems.What problems?What experiments have you done?
In one way measurements the primary difficulty is to provide syncronisation of atomic clocks.
If you don't read/know the essence of the case, you may ask similar shallow questions and your position becomes off-side.
What problems?
Quote from: puppypower on 28/06/2020 15:22:01 In fact, relativistic mass is often reasoned away, so it can be ignored in peace.The man in the street knows one, and only one, equation related to relativityE= MC2where the M stands for mass.and yet you are trying to tell us that mass is abandoned.What planet are you on?
you will never hear the examples mention the masses of the train and/or stationary person and the energy or fuel used.
If the heavy hits a stationary light,
It is space and we have no fixed reference point to know who is moving at what speed,
LCS method predicts that the results of one way will be different than c
Quote from: xersanozgen on 29/06/2020 17:25:03LCS method predicts that the results of one way will be different than cGosh!