0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Big Bang may have been a one-time event. For all we know, the probability of a second Big Bang really is 0%.
That would prevent any further interactions and therefore eliminate the possibility for the formation of complex structures
I presented an explanation that there should be multiple bangs and its probability is 100% at infinite time, but you didn't present an explanation how you determine it is a one-time event and its probability is 0%
But we have our big bang " which resulted in our universe" and it formed complex structure , what I am saying another big bang will do the same thing.
Your explanation is speculation. You don't know that a second Big Bang is even possible. It might be, but you don't know that.
I presented mathematics, physics and biology with logical arguments,
I am saying another big bang will do the same thing.
and there is no way to know if that will happen or not.You are just guessing.
this idea still worthwhile
What use can I make of it?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/07/2019 11:25:06What use can I make of it?Hope for another life.
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 14/07/2019 11:30:01Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/07/2019 11:25:06What use can I make of it?Hope for another life.But it won't be "my" life.It will be a life that I'm never even aware of.
new creation of yourself means you feel things again
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 14/07/2019 13:57:39new creation of yourself means you feel things againNo.It may mean that someone else does, but it won't be me.I will be dead.
Your contention is that big bangs are repeatable- there is an infinite sequence of them of them.If that's true then it's vanishingly unlikely that ours is the first.So, if that's true, you are already a repeat of someone just like you.Do you remember them?You will never know the previous ones nor the future ones.They will never interact with you.It will make literally no difference to your life.
And because it does not make your life different, it can not possibly make it better.
We know how physics works and according to how physics , mathematics and biology work my argument is logical.
If not could you explain?
You can falsify my argument if you point out a point which is wrong, if all points are right then my argument is right.