0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You refuse to define evidence.
Evidence is a reason to think that what you say is true.
The fact that there is a universe suggests a creator.
That it can be dated means that it is not eternal, a prerequisite of God.
Companies that conduct polling base their predictions on the results of a very small number of participants. It is amazing how accurate they are with so few responders.
I think they can be applied to some degree to determine whether or not God exists.
In my opinion we can discover with certainty that he does exist. I believe the evidence that proves HE IS is overwhelming. OVERWHELMING.
People, millions and millions of us, since roughly 33 A.D. proclaim that we have had the same experience as other believers in Jesus Christ: powerful, loving, healing...
He is eternal and infinite, by definition.
Quote from: duffyd on 12/04/2020 01:17:12In my opinion we can discover with certainty that he does exist. I believe the evidence that proves HE IS is overwhelming. OVERWHELMING.What is the evidence?Lots of people believe in Christianity and lots believe in Islam and lots believe in Hinduism and lots don't have a religious belief. That is evidence that people have different beliefs and nothing more.The universe exists, that is not evidence of a god, that is evidence that the universe exists.If you have evidence that God exists I would love to see it. If it is compelling evidence then you could even convert this old atheist. Just give some real evidence.
Scientifically, this significant statistical data is foundational in establishing the credibility of this individual's claims to be God's Son.
Quote from: duffyd on 12/04/2020 14:51:28He is eternal and infinite, by definition. So is a straight line. But nobody uses it as an excuse to throw stones at children. Try harder.
Quote from: alancalverd on 12/04/2020 16:03:54Quote from: duffyd on 12/04/2020 14:51:28He is eternal and infinite, by definition. So is a straight line. But nobody uses it as an excuse to throw stones at children. Try harder. Alan stated: "Not in any bible I have read. He wasn't that stupid. And even if he had, why would you believe him, let alone a third-hand edited translation of a book written 200 years after his death..."? Back that up.