0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SR considers only one type of relativity concept. In SR the relation of the light and its source is considered like the relation of a car and the road (genuine relativity).
If Einstein could be alive he would reconsider relativity theories by alternative LCS concept and he would revise his paradigm; because the arguments about methodological defects are clear/transparent and effective.
1- The LCS is just as elusive as the absolute rest frame! 2- SR has an established history of successful experimental agreements.
In reality, the train burnt the fuel and was placed on motion due too this. The amount of energy needed is lower since the station is a large stone building
LCS concept considers the same experimental results of the theory SR:1- The measuring experiments of the light's velocity; the result: we get the same value on everywhereThe conclusion of SR: this measured value is relative speed of light according to its source or local place (train/perron/the place of experiment)Interpretation of LCS: we can measure just the universal speed of light (relative value according to outmost space frame).The isotropic quality of measuring experiment is a powerfull evidence for universal speed.2- Michelson - Morley interferometer experiment: The amount of fringes is the same for different directions.The conclusion of SR: The velocity of light never gets any addition from its source's speed. Interpretation of LCS: The light arrives by always the velocity ' c ' to an observer/receptor. 3- Muon experiment: It claims Natural muons lives longer than the muons of laboratory.The conclusion according to SR: the diference of time can be explained by the formulas of SR.Interpretation of LCS: The paper of this experiment use the muon's speed value according to the Earth for calculation; whereas it must consider the difference of the speeds of natural and laboratory muons; but, unfortunately the speeds of natural muons and laboratory muons are on the same level.
https://www.academia.edu/34982209/An_Experiment_for_Lorentz_-Fitzgerald_Contraction Abstract: If length contraction is real, the electrical resistance value of a conductive cable must be changed in accordance with its different directions because of its universal motion. The management of precision is important for this experiment. Our electrical resistance based experiment did not indicate an evidence for the length contraction; all measured values are isotropic.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 02/11/2017 14:46:41https://www.academia.edu/34982209/An_Experiment_for_Lorentz_-Fitzgerald_Contraction Abstract: If length contraction is real, the electrical resistance value of a conductive cable must be changed in accordance with its different directions because of its universal motion. The management of precision is important for this experiment. Our electrical resistance based experiment did not indicate an evidence for the length contraction; all measured values are isotropic.Length contraction is ''real'' using the present semantics involved.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 05/10/2017 16:15:57Fitzgerald had submitted a saver claim (contraction) for aether concept against the negative result of Michelson - Morley experiment.1- It's not a claim and never was. Lorentz stated it as a postulate for the null result of the MMX and its something that is subject to observation. A "claim" is something that is stated with no evidence of it being valid. That's not the same thing as a postulate.2- The Lorentz validity of Lorentz contraction has been demonstrated many times. One observation concerns the observation of muons which are created in the upper atmosphere. For details see:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contractionLorentz contraction also manifests itself by observations of the EM field surrounding conductors. For details see:http://www.newenglandphysics.org/physics_world/em/rotating_magnet.htmWhether or not someone has actually constructed an experiment, run it and recorded the results is another story. However I'm fairly sure that there's ample evidence out there which imply it.One thing to understand regarding the validity of various things is that one makes a prediction and then constructs an experiment and/or makes an observation. If the observation contradicts the prediction then what led to the prediction is wrong. If the observation is consistent with the prediction then we have more confidence in the prediction and what led us to the prediction.3- Einstein's special theory of relativity (SR) one can derive the Lorentz contraction from the two postulates of SR, i.e. in SR Lorentz contraction is not a postulate but is derived.If you've never seen the derivation of Lorentz contraction and know algebra then you can follow the derivation at the web page I created for that purpose. See:http://www.newenglandphysics.org/physics_world/sr/lorentz_contraction.htm
Fitzgerald had submitted a saver claim (contraction) for aether concept against the negative result of Michelson - Morley experiment.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/11/2017 14:55:13Quote from: xersanozgen on 02/11/2017 14:46:41https://www.academia.edu/34982209/An_Experiment_for_Lorentz_-Fitzgerald_Contraction Abstract: If length contraction is real, the electrical resistance value of a conductive cable must be changed in accordance with its different directions because of its universal motion. The management of precision is important for this experiment. Our electrical resistance based experiment did not indicate an evidence for the length contraction; all measured values are isotropic.Length contraction is ''real'' using the present semantics involved. Please note this experiment; put to a rack in brain. If I or someone say that to believe is a scientific method, you must object.Of course we want to protect our holly; however to update in science is ordinary. Naked scientists must want to catch genuineness instead of dogmatism.Don’t worry for length contraction or SR; because, people always need idols (of course these idols/fantastic inferences are more respectable according to astrology etc.), the mystical admiration or dogmatic appropriation will remain for few centuries, even if inaccuracy of them is determined.
I can and have already proved this but the proof itself and facts do not really help the situation where the untruth actually works for our needs of GPS.
hmm, when it comes to gps and the way you define the values there I don't know. That would probably need to get into a real in depth analysis with more exactness. But there are other tests where you need to compensate for length contractions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity#Time_dilation_and_length_contraction" Basically, because of length contraction you can squeeze in more charged particles in a single bunch than you could without length contraction. The design of the particle accelerator takes this length contraction into account, and the accelerator functions as designed. " By DaleAnd here are some more effects involving length contractionshttp://www.iflscience.com/physics/4-examples-relativity-everyday-life/Whatever idea you have you will need a explanation for them, and a test proving your idea to give an explanation for some behavior where standard physics (SR) fails.