1
New Theories / Re: My Theory on The Structure of Human Life, and Regulated Intellect in Species.
« on: 01/02/2021 07:10:29 »
I may just keep updating with any thought I have on here actually, at least then it is a constant publishing of any connection I make in my head.
Another angle I have been thinking of is that in order for Humans to be a species that is still held within the constraints of nature, and not a truly free species, as we like to think we are with our intelligence, is that there would have to be a certain amount of ignorance built into our survival traits. This could be ignorance through ambition, for example. There is no doubt in my mind that the majority of Humans on the planet think that we are free to do as we please, and that we are in control. It almost seems that the ability to save ourselves from anything is within our grasp. In my opinion, it makes sense for us to have this opinion, if we are to be kept in naturally occurring cycles, for instance.
If you look at the damage we do to our planet, and the potential need for us to stop what we are doing, think, and act on it in a quick and efficient way. It seems very unlikely that will happen due to this belief we have that we can think around it. However, this ability to think around anything, as well as being dictated by our belief we are in some sort of control, is also being governed by the sheer numbers of Humans, and the structures in place. Even if a part of the planet is saying they believe we need to stop what we are doing, and there is a large amount of evidence to support this, as there is, we still do not have the ability to act on it as difference of opinion is there through the structure that is in place in our species.
A hierarchy system dictates that only a small amount of people with have the final decision. Meaning, regardless of the intelligence and evidence in an idea or need, the likelihood of that occurring is again seriously diminished. Evidence and rational thinking are not always enough, despite our ability to think.
It is the same if you factor in different cultures and belief systems. A consensus need to follow a pattern of life that is beneficial to us is almost impossible to obtain because of this diversity. You could also argue that any other form of idea would have the same difficulties in becoming prominent, it could also be applied to any discovery we make as a species, or physical progression in terms of technology. The structures deem that these will not be used or accepted in every part of Humanity, and maybe not even come to fruition at all, if you consider theories are ideas.
These are more reasons why I believe evolution is compensating for Human intelligence, as it is a potential detriment to the survival of many aspects of any form of life on this planet. Human intelligence is in fact annulled, on many levels by structure, and I will continue to try and share as many examples of this as possible.
I think intelligence development and regulation is also a two way system, as obviously you need the ability to coordinate and cognitively think to manage some of these systems as a species.
If you think of intelligence as being adapted to in the same way as any other aspect of life by evolution, for example, a bird does not adapt as a whole, but say an extra feather to help it turn quicker to evade a predator, a piece by piece adaptation, then any adaptation to compensate for us as a species in intelligence could also be a door for further progression. For example, if the ability to coordinate a hierarchal structure comes into play to allow us to create a structure that occupies us to limit our use of intellect, then this may lead to the ability to coordinate in other ways, which may then lead to progression in other departments as well. Compensations only happen after a negative impact on survival occurs, or something that promotes survival comes into fruition, so you could argue the frontline of our intelligence, or the most progressed part of it to name it, is still progressing and incurring regulation, to this day.
Just some early morning, in bed doing nothing, thoughts.
Another angle I have been thinking of is that in order for Humans to be a species that is still held within the constraints of nature, and not a truly free species, as we like to think we are with our intelligence, is that there would have to be a certain amount of ignorance built into our survival traits. This could be ignorance through ambition, for example. There is no doubt in my mind that the majority of Humans on the planet think that we are free to do as we please, and that we are in control. It almost seems that the ability to save ourselves from anything is within our grasp. In my opinion, it makes sense for us to have this opinion, if we are to be kept in naturally occurring cycles, for instance.
If you look at the damage we do to our planet, and the potential need for us to stop what we are doing, think, and act on it in a quick and efficient way. It seems very unlikely that will happen due to this belief we have that we can think around it. However, this ability to think around anything, as well as being dictated by our belief we are in some sort of control, is also being governed by the sheer numbers of Humans, and the structures in place. Even if a part of the planet is saying they believe we need to stop what we are doing, and there is a large amount of evidence to support this, as there is, we still do not have the ability to act on it as difference of opinion is there through the structure that is in place in our species.
A hierarchy system dictates that only a small amount of people with have the final decision. Meaning, regardless of the intelligence and evidence in an idea or need, the likelihood of that occurring is again seriously diminished. Evidence and rational thinking are not always enough, despite our ability to think.
It is the same if you factor in different cultures and belief systems. A consensus need to follow a pattern of life that is beneficial to us is almost impossible to obtain because of this diversity. You could also argue that any other form of idea would have the same difficulties in becoming prominent, it could also be applied to any discovery we make as a species, or physical progression in terms of technology. The structures deem that these will not be used or accepted in every part of Humanity, and maybe not even come to fruition at all, if you consider theories are ideas.
These are more reasons why I believe evolution is compensating for Human intelligence, as it is a potential detriment to the survival of many aspects of any form of life on this planet. Human intelligence is in fact annulled, on many levels by structure, and I will continue to try and share as many examples of this as possible.
I think intelligence development and regulation is also a two way system, as obviously you need the ability to coordinate and cognitively think to manage some of these systems as a species.
If you think of intelligence as being adapted to in the same way as any other aspect of life by evolution, for example, a bird does not adapt as a whole, but say an extra feather to help it turn quicker to evade a predator, a piece by piece adaptation, then any adaptation to compensate for us as a species in intelligence could also be a door for further progression. For example, if the ability to coordinate a hierarchal structure comes into play to allow us to create a structure that occupies us to limit our use of intellect, then this may lead to the ability to coordinate in other ways, which may then lead to progression in other departments as well. Compensations only happen after a negative impact on survival occurs, or something that promotes survival comes into fruition, so you could argue the frontline of our intelligence, or the most progressed part of it to name it, is still progressing and incurring regulation, to this day.
Just some early morning, in bed doing nothing, thoughts.