0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:05:20Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky. There is a likely situation where I might have autism and be a higher functioning autistic person. I have brain dis-functions so If I want to take the mick out of myself I will. Mass is shown on a set of scales, and you do not speak for the world, if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. Mass is shown on a set of scales like you agree, so what gives the object its mass? I think objectively you will find the answer is force my friend.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky.
A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.
if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:08:58'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase. Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education. You can not have a discussion about an idea, you do not know how to discuss an idea. Saying a person is wrong just on the basis of posting present information , the information that I am showing is wrong, is not discussing my friend and not looking why it is wrong.
'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:10:36 if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. There are a few scientists looking at this.We are laughing at you.Even if you think you are right about science (spoiler alert- you are not), surely you recognise that, by misusing phrases like "frivolous litigation", you prove that you ought to learn what they actually mean?
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:14:14Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:08:58'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase. Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education. You can not have a discussion about an idea, you do not know how to discuss an idea. Saying a person is wrong just on the basis of posting present information , the information that I am showing is wrong, is not discussing my friend and not looking why it is wrong. It is not a discussion about an idea though is it though? It you crowing about universally accepted definitions of basic physics being wrong because you are too lazy to actually learn anything.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:10:36Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:05:20Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky. There is a likely situation where I might have autism and be a higher functioning autistic person. I have brain dis-functions so If I want to take the mick out of myself I will. Mass is shown on a set of scales, and you do not speak for the world, if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. Mass is shown on a set of scales like you agree, so what gives the object its mass? I think objectively you will find the answer is force my friend. You did not define mass, it was defined long before your sad existence and no matter how much you try to change the definition, you will always be wrong. Mass and equations using force are used in all sorts of applications in engineering etc and have been shown to work - unlike you.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:17:45Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:10:36Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:05:20Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky. There is a likely situation where I might have autism and be a higher functioning autistic person. I have brain dis-functions so If I want to take the mick out of myself I will. Mass is shown on a set of scales, and you do not speak for the world, if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. Mass is shown on a set of scales like you agree, so what gives the object its mass? I think objectively you will find the answer is force my friend. You did not define mass, it was defined long before your sad existence and no matter how much you try to change the definition, you will always be wrong. Mass and equations using force are used in all sorts of applications in engineering etc and have been shown to work - unlike you. You did not define mass either, it is not your mistake , it is histories mistake, you can't see it wrong because it is what you learnt and think is correct.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:35:58Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:17:45Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 20:10:36Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:05:20Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky. There is a likely situation where I might have autism and be a higher functioning autistic person. I have brain dis-functions so If I want to take the mick out of myself I will. Mass is shown on a set of scales, and you do not speak for the world, if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. Mass is shown on a set of scales like you agree, so what gives the object its mass? I think objectively you will find the answer is force my friend. You did not define mass, it was defined long before your sad existence and no matter how much you try to change the definition, you will always be wrong. Mass and equations using force are used in all sorts of applications in engineering etc and have been shown to work - unlike you. You did not define mass either, it is not your mistake , it is histories mistake, you can't see it wrong because it is what you learnt and think is correct.Dont be such a condescending idiot. Whilst I didnt define it, the definition is accepted universally. I dont see the point of your argument, other than acting like a rather foolish child trying to show how clever he is. Interesting you are claiming to autism now. You seem to claim to have various disorders at different times to garner sympathy.
Yeah, of course you do. Ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? Self diagnosed then. Guessed as much.
I'm out. I think the quote from George Carlin is most appropriate here:“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”
Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:26:08Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education. Nope.My education- subjective or otherwise- didn't train me to deal with idiots online.It couldn't aspire to do so, given that it finished in 1988, at which point there essentially wasn't an internet.So the facts show that you are wrong..I await with mild amusement your shift in reality which will let you pretend you were right all along.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/03/2018 02:18:56Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:26:08Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education. Nope.My education- subjective or otherwise- didn't train me to deal with idiots online.It couldn't aspire to do so, given that it finished in 1988, at which point there essentially wasn't an internet.So the facts show that you are wrong..I await with mild amusement your shift in reality which will let you pretend you were right all along. You know what? I am not going to reply to you ever again because you are just too stupid to think so I give up talking to you .Do not reply because I will no longer answer you Mr Troll. It is people like you who set out to hamper sciences progression.
Mass is a measure of the force being imposed on the object on the scales . Mass is a measure True of the force being imposed Trueon the object on the scales True
and think you may have misunderstood a few things