0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Again, the link to 'over unity' and perpetual motion is a misconcpetion.
Bored Chemist. Good luck on that experiment. I'd love to know the results.
I agree that it wouldn't work. Why are overunity machines perpetual motion machines in disguise? Can you explain this? I personally, do not know of anyone who claims perpetual motion. But I do know an awful lot of people who have found 'untiy' as determined by thermodynamic laws and as applied to electric current - to be substantially different. Theory appears to conflict with the experimental evidence.
The relevance of these fields to electric current is explained in this thread. I'm so impressed that you actually have tried to get your mind around this. It entirely defeats most people including academic physicists - with precisely two exceptions. Thanks for that bit of encouragement - if that's what was intended. Truth is that the whole thing is speculative unless and until I can get that ruddy paper published so that academics can look at the model more closely. The electric circuit is the only proof I have of that model.
What I am suggesting that certain presumptions that require tht the amount of energy delivered to never exceed the amount of energy dissipated is only correct if you do not switch the current. If you switch the current - even from utility supply sources, then the amount of energy dissipated can exceed the amount of energy delivered.But I am not simply just 'claiming' this fact. I am asking anyone who contends it to set up the apparatus and find out for yourselves. It is repeatedly evident that there is some 'flaw' in classical presumption related to the measurement of electric energy.