0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
space outside the box now occupied by the box.
You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?
Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 18:53:59space outside the box now occupied by the box. Um, how can a box occupy space outside of itself?I don't mean this to be rude, but it might help give me an understanding as to why people have trouble understanding you: is English your first language? Alternatively, might you have dyslexia or something related?
the balls radius from the source will increase
Or maybe I am just not very good at explanation.
Says who?
If you do not believe me take a trip to the sun, at first time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensation. Now if the sun was to increase in output, the field density extends in radius, you would burn up much faster and earlier on in your journey.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 20:42:39If you do not believe me take a trip to the sun, at first time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensation. Now if the sun was to increase in output, the field density extends in radius, you would burn up much faster and earlier on in your journey. That is absolute nonsense.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?
Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:28:18Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 20:42:39If you do not believe me take a trip to the sun, at first time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensation. Now if the sun was to increase in output, the field density extends in radius, you would burn up much faster and earlier on in your journey. That is absolute nonsense. Electromagnetic radiation does not need a medium to heat, to be activated, this why astronauts where reflective space suits . The astronaut travelling to the sun becomes the ''medium'' that reacts to the density of the field.
Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention?
Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:33:06Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention? A typo because I am human, it should of said inverse.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:32:00Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:28:18Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 20:42:39If you do not believe me take a trip to the sun, at first time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensation. Now if the sun was to increase in output, the field density extends in radius, you would burn up much faster and earlier on in your journey. That is absolute nonsense. Electromagnetic radiation does not need a medium to heat, to be activated, this why astronauts where reflective space suits . The astronaut travelling to the sun becomes the ''medium'' that reacts to the density of the field. 'Where reflective spacesuits'? As Kryptid asked - is English not your first language? It is not just that you are bad at explanation, your use of English is inept.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:36:39Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:33:06Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention? A typo because I am human, it should of said inverse. Still a nonsense phrase.
Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:39:40Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:36:39Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:33:06Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention? A typo because I am human, it should of said inverse. Still a nonsense phrase. Maybe you need pictures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_lawtry here i.e inverse
time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensation
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:41:11Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:39:40Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:36:39Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:33:06Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention? A typo because I am human, it should of said inverse. Still a nonsense phrase. Maybe you need pictures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_lawtry here i.e inverse So why the hell didnt you say proportional to the inverse square law which people would have understood? If you tried to concentrate a little bit more on your grammar and language in general people may just be able to understand you but instead you play loose with the English language, come up with nonsense phrases then use the excuse that peopel are 'trolling' you when they dont understand.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:39:51time will slow down as the earths field weakens the more you travel away, then time will start to speed up as you get nearer the sun and the field density increase. There is of course the eventuality time will be so fast your skin will just flake away and you will feel a horrible burning sensationThis is of course nonsense and betrays a complete misunderstanding of physics if you really believe this.
Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:45:16Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:41:11Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:39:40Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 21:36:39Quote from: The Spoon on 19/02/2018 21:33:06Quote from: Thebox on 18/02/2018 23:12:44Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/02/2018 22:01:47You are right in saying I don't understand.Nor does anyone else, as far as I can tell.Whose fault is that?Imagine a metal ball suspended by a force , field. Now if we increased the strength of the field the field will become denser and the balls radius from the source will increase , so directly proportional to the invert, an increase in energy is an increase in density of the field directly proportional to the invertok?That is also nonsense. Why do you use such bizarre phrases as 'proportional to the invert'? Why not use terms that are commonly accepted if you want people to understand you? Or is it the case that you dont want people to understand and you are just stringing them along with meaningless phrases in an attempt to maintain attention? A typo because I am human, it should of said inverse. Still a nonsense phrase. Maybe you need pictures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_lawtry here i.e inverse So why the hell didnt you say proportional to the inverse square law which people would have understood? If you tried to concentrate a little bit more on your grammar and language in general people may just be able to understand you but instead you play loose with the English language, come up with nonsense phrases then use the excuse that peopel are 'trolling' you when they dont understand. I assume that any scientist would be smart enough to work out exactly what I was saying with my casual relaxed style of posts. I am hardly writing a lecture speech or a scientific article in most threads. You can see over in my N-field thread that I am improving, although I do admit I have some help and they are helping me improve .