41
New Theories / Re: The two-blade hacksaw
« on: 02/04/2023 20:11:23 »
It looks simple enough that you could rig up your own and test it.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Can Primordial Gas Clouds collapse in such a manner that they surpass the Star Formation stage & Directly create a Black Hole?
That is how it works. As for Kryptid's comments, yes I made up a thing to explain a thing, it's called an original idea, or 'hypothesis' in physics, a science in which this is the standard way of going about doing science. We see phenomena and come up with ideas to explain them.
You're using free electrons here as opposed to electrons in their bound state around atomic nuclei, aren't you?
There would have to be some special rule/principle governing the behaviour of electrons in orbit around a nucleus allowing them to tunnel to far great distances
or it might be that aspects of quantum theory are incorrect.
The explanatory power of this model is too great for me to simply put aside, unfortunately.
I think, also, string theory more or less also made the admission that gravitational fields are formed of quanta (particles) of the electrical field (i.e. electrons).
However, now we do understand that the Universe was already infinite before the Big Bang.
Therefore, the time was ticking long before the Big Bang moment.
So, please are you sure that we can bypass the law of physics while the time was already there?
Don't you agree that our mission is to explain the entire space/universe and not just the part/section that we observe/see which is called observable universe?
I would like to remind you that there was a time when people on earth thought that our planet is flat and if you cross the horizon, you might fall into the open space.
Hence, what we see is not good enough - not for today and not for the past.
Hence, as the real space is infinite then why can't we assume that the real universe is also infinite.
Therefore, why do we insist on 13.8BY as some magic number?
Why do we refuse to accept the simple understanding that infinite space & Universe could exist if the time is also infinite or at least much bigger than this friction of moment (comparing to the infinity)
If the space is infinite then how the space could expand to the infinity in only 13.8BY?
My theory predicts PE2 particles (anti-protons) should be unstable in a positively charged universe.
Suck the air out of a plastic bottle , it collapses under the vac pressure . Thats what I mean by vac pressure
Your oceans and Islands are all within the set volume , you are looking from within the volume raather than an external view of the volume with all due respect .
If you removed the islands and oceans from the set...
I'm hung up on this because I think science should be precise in explanation with no room or doubt for critism .
A vacuum is a space devoid of matter according to google
Welcome to the Forum Bob!
However, I hope you will not be offended. If I said, we could use a second opinion of a physicist with regards to this particular point. because I believe it's important, I don't remember you addressing it anyway
Literally existing!? partly existing!? There are no such things, and they have no meaning in this universe, it's either you exist, or you don't.
I think the name quasi-particles has nothing to do with them being real or imaginary or partly existing. They have mass and they interact, they are a form of matter.
Although am not sure if they can split the positron in a different experiment into anti-quasi-particles.
what mattered is the question: would there be any matter left of the Electron? which you did not address as well.
Maybe, they don't need a medium like light, or maybe when they are bound, they are each other's medium, maybe if there is a force that governs their bound state (external factor) maybe, it would be their medium, can you say for sure it is impossible to be?
I don't see that; they can't cease to exist in any sense other than "cease to exist"
There has been a dramatic turn for the worse lately, where does all this nonsense come from? I suspect mental health problems.
On behalf of All of Us, Welcome to the Forum.
Science deny the existence of any sort of aether , isn't your reply contradictive ?