0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Traditional search engines like Google prioritize most referred sources.
At best, consensus represents the opinion of the average man.
Advances in understanding are made by exceptional people questioning the consensus.
In this video, I dive deep into the landscape of academic research. I share insights from my own journey, focusing on the discovery and exploration of research gaps. These gaps, often seen as voids in our understanding, are in fact golden opportunities for innovation and progress. I discuss four distinct types of research gaps that I've encountered, including the personal challenges and triumphs I've experienced in bridging them.
Embark on a journey to redefine your academic search with Consensus AI, the cutting-edge tool transforming the landscape of research.TIMESTAMPS00:00 How to use Consensus00:48 How to Use AI Summary02:43 How to use Consensus Meter03:23 How to use Consensus Co Pilot04:47 How to Filter with Consensus06:40 Digging Deeper into Consensus08:41 Consensus on the GPT Store09:38 Wrapping Up
Democratic societies whose constituents are mostly incompetent are less likely to survive.
Usually, least competent members of the societies would die out earlier.
It would tip the average value upward.
is clearly not the case in, for example, the USA or anywhere that religion or party/tribal loyalty influences the democratic process.
In atoms, only certain orbitals are permitted (quantization)- To calculate these orbitals, you need to solve the wave equation for the electron.- Some of these orbitals are spherical, but others look like a cluster of balloons assembled by a clown. How do you calculate the radius and centripetal motion for these?
We describe the possible fundamental vibrations on a sphere in three dimensions by counting, mirroring and rotating nodal lines.This video ist part of the online course www.quantumreflections.net dealing with quantum physics, produced by the institute for physics education research, M?nster university (Germany)
Spatially, the patterns extend to infinity, although with quickly dropped magnitude for further distances. While dark regions within finite distances might be interpreted as products of destructive interference.Unlike in a dipole antenna where the movement of electrons is confined in one dimension, the electrons around atomic nucleus can move in three dimensions.
Based on the radiation patterns that we can measure for various shapes of antenna where we can control the motion of the electrons, we can calculate backwards to infer how electrons should move around the nucleus to produce radiation patterns resembling known atomic orbitals. It will require adequately accurate and precise electrodynamic model.
It's as if electrons can magically jump from one region with high probability to another regions without having to travel the space between them.
It is precisely the absence of electromagnetic emission from atoms in equilibrium that put an end to the Bohr atom.
There's no implication that they magically jump.
You can say that they casually leap or tunnel.
It suggests that electrons can disappear from their previous positions and reappear in new position without traveling through the space in between.
No. It's why Bohr proposed his model, against Rutherford's planetary model.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 03/05/2024 13:05:54No. It's why Bohr proposed his model, against Rutherford's planetary model.Bohr's electrons orbit, That's the problem.
No. Probability does not imply that anything moves.
No. Tunneling is an entirely different phenomenon.
He postulated that some orbits are stable, hence electrons occupying them don't radiate energy.
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/05/2024 17:48:56No. Tunneling is an entirely different phenomenon.Are you fine with the word leap?