0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: championoftruth on 18/10/2023 20:52:46No evidence for axions.You mean "No evidence for axions yet."The experiments are still underway.But you are missing the point. Even if dark mass doesn't turn out to be axions, we still know that it's real.Are you missing it deliberately, or do you just not understand?
No evidence for axions.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/10/2023 22:22:26Quote from: championoftruth on 18/10/2023 20:52:46No evidence for axions.You mean "No evidence for axions yet."The experiments are still underway.But you are missing the point. Even if dark mass doesn't turn out to be axions, we still know that it's real.Are you missing it deliberately, or do you just not understand?A compare and contrast hubble photos and JWST photos of the same galaxy found the missing mass. Its just ordinary matter glowing less brightly. no mysterious dark matter. you can see it yourself.
A compare and contrast hubble photos and JWST photos of the same galaxy found the missing mass. Its just ordinary matter glowing less brightly. no mysterious dark matter. you can see it yourself.
Quote from: championoftruth on 20/10/2023 16:06:29A compare and contrast hubble photos and JWST photos of the same galaxy found the missing mass. Its just ordinary matter glowing less brightly. no mysterious dark matter. you can see it yourself.Source?
I'm asking for a link. Give me a link to some kind of scientific publication where it was stated that the missing mass was discovered by comparing photographs.
I was assuming you could look it up yourself instead of me quoting what you would consider a biased source.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy4rOY0Bjko
Nasa pictures. They showed a picture of a galaxy with dark patches between the arms by Hubble. Then superimposed one by JWST and low and behold the dark patches were no more dark patches but gas glowing less brightly due to being distant from other stars in the arms and getting less illumination/radiation. No more mysterious dark matter dark energy dark sextors dark axions.
Quote from: championoftruth on 23/10/2023 12:56:38I was assuming you could look it up yourself instead of me quoting what you would consider a biased source.//www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy4rOY0BjkoShe's not so biased as you might think I'd believe. She has very good points and I actually agree with her that MOND is something that is worth exploring. Moreover, dark matter and MOND aren't mutually exclusive. Some combination of the two may prove to be the solution.Also, that PDF you posted appears to be about MOND. I, on the other hand, was asking you specifically about this quote of yours:Quote from: championoftruth on 20/10/2023 21:52:12Nasa pictures. They showed a picture of a galaxy with dark patches between the arms by Hubble. Then superimposed one by JWST and low and behold the dark patches were no more dark patches but gas glowing less brightly due to being distant from other stars in the arms and getting less illumination/radiation. No more mysterious dark matter dark energy dark sextors dark axions.I see no mention of Hubble, JWST or photographs in that paper you linked. So again I must ask you: what study was it that revealed the source of the missing mass had been discovered by comparing NASA photographs? More specifically, how was the mass of those patches of gas measured so it could be compared to the expected missing mass value? If we had found that the missing mass really was just clouds of normal matter, there would be no need for either dark matter or MOND, so I don't know why you are linking me a MOND video and a MOND paper.
The paper is not about MOND.
In the presented paper we have considered the possible explanation of observed galacticrotation curves by the assumption that the observed effect of the flatness can be explained bysome alternative theory of gravity which introduces an extra term which we called �(�).
I lost the link and will post when i find it. Why dont you search for it?
Quote from: Kryptid on 20/10/2023 21:54:51I'm asking for a link. Give me a link to some kind of scientific publication where it was stated that the missing mass was discovered by comparing photographs.
you can find links yourself.your afraid that the dark matter is just nonsense to group think concensus
Quote from: championoftruth on 23/10/2023 13:57:31Quote from: Kryptid on 20/10/2023 21:54:51I'm asking for a link. Give me a link to some kind of scientific publication where it was stated that the missing mass was discovered by comparing photographs.you can find links yourself.your afraid that the dark matter is just nonsense to group think concensus
Is the cosmic microwave background radiation pseudoscience